open access

Vol 75, No 4 (2016)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Published online: 2016-05-10
Submitted: 2016-03-04
Accepted: 2016-04-18
Get Citation

The validity of eight neoclassical facial canons in the Turkish adults

O. Karaca Saygili, S. Cinar, B. Gulcen, E. Ozcan, I. Kus
DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2016.0028
·
Pubmed: 27830884
·
Folia Morphol 2016;75(4):512-517.

open access

Vol 75, No 4 (2016)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Published online: 2016-05-10
Submitted: 2016-03-04
Accepted: 2016-04-18

Abstract

The neoclassical canons were used to define the proportions between various areas of the head and face. Therefore, this study was done to establish the neoclassical canons of facial proportions in Turkish adults. A total of 200 healthy adults 20 to 35 years of age were examined. Using anthropometric landmarks, 5 horizontal and 9 vertical direct measurements were made on the faces with a sliding calliper. Results have been compared with 8 neoclassical facial canons. When comparing between sexes, a significant difference has been found in all measurements except the upper facial width, left eye-fissure width, forehead height I and II (p < 0.005). The nasofacial proportion has been found to include the most proportional subjects (33%) followed by the orbito-nasal (30%), the orbital proportion (25%) and the naso-oral proportion (17%) in the female. Considering the male, the orbital proportion has been found to include the most proportional subjects (23%) followed by the orbito-nasal proportion (21%), naso-facial proportion (19%) and the naso-oral proportion (17%). The neoclassical canons have been shown to rarely be applicable to Turkish adults and our results may contribute to determine the concepts of transcultural facial structures.

Abstract

The neoclassical canons were used to define the proportions between various areas of the head and face. Therefore, this study was done to establish the neoclassical canons of facial proportions in Turkish adults. A total of 200 healthy adults 20 to 35 years of age were examined. Using anthropometric landmarks, 5 horizontal and 9 vertical direct measurements were made on the faces with a sliding calliper. Results have been compared with 8 neoclassical facial canons. When comparing between sexes, a significant difference has been found in all measurements except the upper facial width, left eye-fissure width, forehead height I and II (p < 0.005). The nasofacial proportion has been found to include the most proportional subjects (33%) followed by the orbito-nasal (30%), the orbital proportion (25%) and the naso-oral proportion (17%) in the female. Considering the male, the orbital proportion has been found to include the most proportional subjects (23%) followed by the orbito-nasal proportion (21%), naso-facial proportion (19%) and the naso-oral proportion (17%). The neoclassical canons have been shown to rarely be applicable to Turkish adults and our results may contribute to determine the concepts of transcultural facial structures.

Get Citation

Keywords

facial anthropometric norms, anthropometry, facial analysis

About this article
Title

The validity of eight neoclassical facial canons in the Turkish adults

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 75, No 4 (2016)

Pages

512-517

Published online

2016-05-10

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2016.0028

Pubmed

27830884

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2016;75(4):512-517.

Keywords

facial anthropometric norms
anthropometry
facial analysis

Authors

O. Karaca Saygili
S. Cinar
B. Gulcen
E. Ozcan
I. Kus

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By  "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl