Morphometric analysis of the mandible in the Durban Metropolitan population of South Africa
Abstract
Background: The identification of an individual from skeletal remains plays a vital role in forensic investigation as it is essential for the identification of the individual’s age, sex, and/or race and further analysis. Skeletal characteristics differ from one population group to another since population-specific osteometric standards exist for sex determination. Since the mandible is the largest, strongest and most durable compact facial bone, it is the best preserved after death. While sexual dimorphism of the mandible is indicated by its shape and size, morphometric analysis is more accurate in the determination of sex from the skull. The aim of this study was to evaluate the morphometric parameters of the mandible in the Durban Metropolitan population.
Materials and methods: Various morphometric parameters of the mandible were measured and assessed in 265 digital panoramic radiographs aged between 16 and 30 years (n = 530). Each parameter recorded was statistically analysed using SPSS to determine if a relationship existed between the parameter, and sex and age.
Results: In this study the morphometric parameters of the male mandibles were greater than that of the females. This concurred with the findings of previous studies. The length of the mandibular ramus on the right and left sides was statistically significant with sex.
Conclusions: This correlated with previous studies, indicating that the length of the mandibular ramus generally has higher sexual dimorphism than any other morphometric mandibular parameter (p = 0.000). However, only the length of the right mandibular body was statistically significant when compared with sex (p = 0.040). The findings of this study may assist forensic investigators, anatomists, anthropologists and maxillo-facial surgeons.
Keywords: mandiblemorphometryradiologymandibular bodymandibular ramus
References
- Akhlaghi M, Moradi B, Hajibeygi M. Sex determination using anthropometric dimensions of the clavicle in Iranian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2012; 19(7): 381–385.
- Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, et al. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg. 1978; 36(4): 269–277.
- Duthie J, Bharwani D, Tallents RH, et al. A longitudinal study of normal asymmetric mandibular growth and its relationship to skeletal maturation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132(2): 179–184.
- Fabian FM, Mpembeni R. Sexual dimorphism in the mandible of a homogenous black population of Tanzania. Tanzania J Sci. 2002; 28: 47–54.
- Humphrey LT, Dean MC, Stringer CB. Morphological variation in great ape and modern human mandibles. J Anat. 1999; 195 ( Pt 4): 491–513.
- Indira AP, Markande A, David MP. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex determination - A digital radiographic study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012; 4(2): 58–62.
- Iscan MY, Steyn M. Craniometeric determination of population affinity in South Africa. Int J Legal Med. 1999; 112 (2): 91–97, indexed in Pubmed: 10048665.
- Jayakaran F, Rajangam S, Janakiram S, et al. Sexing of the mandible. Anatomica Karnataka. 2000; 1: 11–16.
- Keyayan AO, Chinclia ML, Hassan A, et al. Morphometric parameters of Keyan adult mandibles. East Africa Med J. 2011; 88: 349–355.
- Luca L, Roberto D, Francesca SM, et al. Consistency of diet and its effects on mandibular morphogenesis in the young rat. Prog Orthod. 2003; 4: 3–7.
- Mbajiorgu FE, Zivanovic S, Asala SA, et al. A pilot study of the mandibular angle in black Zimbabweans. Cent Afr J Med. 1996; 42(10): 285–287.
- Onngkana N, Paivan S. Gender differences in Thai mandibles using metric analysis. Chiang Mai Med J. 2009; 48: 43–48.
- Palli TJ, Devi TS, Devi CKL. Studies on human mandible. IOSR J Dental Med Sci. 2014; 13: 8–15.
- Rai R, Ranade A, Prabhu L, et al. A Pilot Study of the Mandibular Angle and Ramus in Indian Population. Int J Morphol. 2007; 25(2).
- Ranganath V, Ravindranath Y, Ravindranath R. Sexual dimorphism in mandibular morphology: a study on South Indian sample. South Asian Anthropologist. 2008; 8: 9–11.
- Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, et al. Mandibular ramus: an indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56 Suppl 1: S13–S16.
- Shamout AR, Ammoush M, Alrbato R, Habahbah AA. Age and gender differences in gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects. Pakistan Oral Dental J. 2012; 32: 81–87.
- Suzuki M, Takahashi Y. Anthropological studies on the mandible of the recent Chubu Japanese. J Anthrop Soc Nippon. 1975; 83(4): 320–329.
- Vinay G, MangalaGowri SR. Determination of gender by the anthropometric measurements of human mandible using ramus breadth and mandibular angle: a cross sectional study from South India. J Med Sci. 2013; 1: 28–32.
- Vinay G, MangalaGowri SR, Anbalagan J. Sex determination of human mandible using metrical parameters. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013; 7(12): 2671–2673, doi:10.7860/JCDR/2013/7621.3728, indexed in Pubmed: 24551607.
- Vondanovic M, Dumancic J, Demo Z, et al. Determination of sex by discriminate function analysis of mandibles from two Croatian archaeological sites. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2006; 40: 263–277.
- Weiner R. Chew on this: is there a dominant side for chewing? J Mass Dent Soc. 2001; 50(2): 36–38.
- Yassir A. Ramus height and its relationship with skeletal and dental measurements. J Oral Res. 2013; 1: 2–5.
