Vol 64, No 1 (2005)
Original article
Submitted: 2012-02-06
Published online: 2004-12-10
Differences in oestrogen and progesterone receptors, HER-2, p53 expression and proliferation in ductal breast cancers in relation to histopathological grade
R. Zasławski, P. Surowiak, P. Paluchowski, P. Dzięgiel, A. Maciejczyk, M. Pudełko, A. Wojnar, M. Zabel
Folia Morphol 2005;64(1):9-15.
Vol 64, No 1 (2005)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Submitted: 2012-02-06
Published online: 2004-12-10
Abstract
In case of breast cancer the grade of differentiation and expression of oestrogen
and progesterone receptors falls within the first category of prognostic factors
according to the College of American Pathologists. HER-2, p53 and Ki67 belong
to the second category and their significance still awaits confirmation. The aim of
the present study was to examine the relationship between the intensity of expression
of oestrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PgR), HER-2, p53
and Ki67 in cells of ductal breast cancer of G1, G2 or G3 differentiation grade. In
paraffin sections of 60 ductal breast cancers (20 cases in G1, 20 in G2 and 20 in
G3), immunocytochemical reactions were performed to detect the expression of
ER, PgR, HER-2, p53 and Ki67. Following a semi-quantitative appraisal of the
preparations under examination, appropriate statistical tests were used to document
significant relationships. We noted significant positive correlations between
ER and PgR (the entire group studied, G1–3, and the G1 group), HER-2 and p53
(G2) and between p53 and Ki67 expression (G2). Significant negative correlations
were found between ER and p53 (G1–3), PgR and p53 (G1–3, G1, G3) and between
PgR and Ki67 (G1–3, G2). The studies performed demonstrated distinct
relationships between the expression intensity of various proteins in tumour cells
in relation to the grade of differentiation of the tumour. We also showed that
a parallel determination of ER, PgR and p53 expression may carry high predictive
value as to response to tamoxifen treatment.
Abstract
In case of breast cancer the grade of differentiation and expression of oestrogen
and progesterone receptors falls within the first category of prognostic factors
according to the College of American Pathologists. HER-2, p53 and Ki67 belong
to the second category and their significance still awaits confirmation. The aim of
the present study was to examine the relationship between the intensity of expression
of oestrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PgR), HER-2, p53
and Ki67 in cells of ductal breast cancer of G1, G2 or G3 differentiation grade. In
paraffin sections of 60 ductal breast cancers (20 cases in G1, 20 in G2 and 20 in
G3), immunocytochemical reactions were performed to detect the expression of
ER, PgR, HER-2, p53 and Ki67. Following a semi-quantitative appraisal of the
preparations under examination, appropriate statistical tests were used to document
significant relationships. We noted significant positive correlations between
ER and PgR (the entire group studied, G1–3, and the G1 group), HER-2 and p53
(G2) and between p53 and Ki67 expression (G2). Significant negative correlations
were found between ER and p53 (G1–3), PgR and p53 (G1–3, G1, G3) and between
PgR and Ki67 (G1–3, G2). The studies performed demonstrated distinct
relationships between the expression intensity of various proteins in tumour cells
in relation to the grade of differentiation of the tumour. We also showed that
a parallel determination of ER, PgR and p53 expression may carry high predictive
value as to response to tamoxifen treatment.
Keywords
breast cancer; prognostic factors; grade; immunocytochemistry
Title
Differences in oestrogen and progesterone receptors, HER-2, p53 expression and proliferation in ductal breast cancers in relation to histopathological grade
Journal
Folia Morphologica
Issue
Vol 64, No 1 (2005)
Article type
Original article
Pages
9-15
Published online
2004-12-10
Page views
424
Article views/downloads
1124
Bibliographic record
Folia Morphol 2005;64(1):9-15.
Keywords
breast cancer
prognostic factors
grade
immunocytochemistry
Authors
R. Zasławski
P. Surowiak
P. Paluchowski
P. Dzięgiel
A. Maciejczyk
M. Pudełko
A. Wojnar
M. Zabel