open access

Vol 59, No 2 (2021)
Original paper
Submitted: 2021-05-14
Accepted: 2021-06-11
Published online: 2021-06-21
Get Citation

Golgi a-mannosidase II mediates the formation of vascular smooth muscle foam cells under inflammatory stress

Kelan Zha1, Qiang Ye1
·
Pubmed: 34151999
·
Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2021;59(2):134-143.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25, Taiping street, Jiangyang District, 646000 Luzhou, China

open access

Vol 59, No 2 (2021)
ORIGINAL PAPERS
Submitted: 2021-05-14
Accepted: 2021-06-11
Published online: 2021-06-21

Abstract

Introduction. Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs)-based foam cell formation is a crucial factor in the atherosclerosis process. We aimed to explore the mechanism of Golgi a-mannosidase II (GMII) effects on the VSMCs-based foam cell formation.

Material and methods. VSMCs were exposed to different concentrations of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and/or GMII inhibitor (swainsonine). The qRT-PCR and western blot were used for expression analysis. Oil Red O staining was used to verify changes of lipid droplets in VSMCs. The translocation of the SCAP from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to Golgi was detected by immunofluorescence (IF).

Results. LPS disrupted the LDLs-mediated regulation of LDL receptor (LDLr) and increased intracellular cholesterol ester, which was inversely inhibited by swainsonine. The activity of a-mannosidase II and GMII expression were decreased by LDLs but increased by the addition of LPS. Conversely, LPS-induced enhancement was reversed by swainsonine. Additionally, swainsonine reversed the LPS-induced increase of intracellular lipid droplets in the presence of LDLs. Expression analysis demonstrated that LDLr, SCAP, and SREBP2 were up-regulated by LPS, but reversed by swainsonine in LDLs-treated cells. IF staining revealed that swainsonine inhibited the translocation of SCAP to Golgi under inflammatory stress.

Conclusions. Collectively, swainsonine restrained LDLr expression to suppress the formation of VSMCs-based foam cells by reducing SREBP2 and SCAP under inflammatory stress conditions, suggesting that GMII contributes to the formation of VSMCs-based foam cells under inflammatory stress.

Abstract

Introduction. Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs)-based foam cell formation is a crucial factor in the atherosclerosis process. We aimed to explore the mechanism of Golgi a-mannosidase II (GMII) effects on the VSMCs-based foam cell formation.

Material and methods. VSMCs were exposed to different concentrations of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and/or GMII inhibitor (swainsonine). The qRT-PCR and western blot were used for expression analysis. Oil Red O staining was used to verify changes of lipid droplets in VSMCs. The translocation of the SCAP from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to Golgi was detected by immunofluorescence (IF).

Results. LPS disrupted the LDLs-mediated regulation of LDL receptor (LDLr) and increased intracellular cholesterol ester, which was inversely inhibited by swainsonine. The activity of a-mannosidase II and GMII expression were decreased by LDLs but increased by the addition of LPS. Conversely, LPS-induced enhancement was reversed by swainsonine. Additionally, swainsonine reversed the LPS-induced increase of intracellular lipid droplets in the presence of LDLs. Expression analysis demonstrated that LDLr, SCAP, and SREBP2 were up-regulated by LPS, but reversed by swainsonine in LDLs-treated cells. IF staining revealed that swainsonine inhibited the translocation of SCAP to Golgi under inflammatory stress.

Conclusions. Collectively, swainsonine restrained LDLr expression to suppress the formation of VSMCs-based foam cells by reducing SREBP2 and SCAP under inflammatory stress conditions, suggesting that GMII contributes to the formation of VSMCs-based foam cells under inflammatory stress.

Get Citation

Keywords

vascular smooth muscle cells; foam cells; LDLr; Golgi a-mannosidase

About this article
Title

Golgi a-mannosidase II mediates the formation of vascular smooth muscle foam cells under inflammatory stress

Journal

Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica

Issue

Vol 59, No 2 (2021)

Article type

Original paper

Pages

134-143

Published online

2021-06-21

Page views

1527

Article views/downloads

868

DOI

10.5603/FHC.a2021.0015

Pubmed

34151999

Bibliographic record

Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2021;59(2):134-143.

Keywords

vascular smooth muscle cells
foam cells
LDLr
Golgi a-mannosidase

Authors

Kelan Zha
Qiang Ye

References (52)
  1. Ye Q, Chen Y, Lei H, et al. Inflammatory stress increases unmodified LDL uptake via LDL receptor: an alternative pathway for macrophage foam-cell formation. Inflamm Res. 2009; 58(11): 809–818.
  2. Tall AR, Yvan-Charvet L. Cholesterol, inflammation and innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015; 15(2): 104–116.
  3. Durham AL, Speer MY, Scatena M, et al. Role of smooth muscle cells in vascular calcification: implications in atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness. Cardiovasc Res. 2018; 114(4): 590–600.
  4. Yu XH, Fu YC, Zhang DW, et al. Foam cells in atherosclerosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2013; 424: 245–252.
  5. Guerrini V, Gennaro ML. Foam Cells: One Size Doesn't Fit All. Trends Immunol. 2019; 40(12): 1163–1179.
  6. Chistiakov DA, Melnichenko AA, Myasoedova VA, et al. Mechanisms of foam cell formation in atherosclerosis. J Mol Med (Berl). 2017; 95(11): 1153–1165.
  7. Maguire EM, Pearce SWA, Xiao Q. Foam cell formation: A new target for fighting atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Vascul Pharmacol. 2019; 112: 54–71.
  8. Bobryshev YV, Lord RS, Golovanova NK, et al. Phenotype determination of anti-GM3 positive cells in atherosclerotic lesions of the human aorta. Hypothetical role of ganglioside GM3 in foam cell formation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001; 1535(2): 87–99.
  9. Dubland JA, Francis GA. So Much Cholesterol: the unrecognized importance of smooth muscle cells in atherosclerotic foam cell formation. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2016; 27(2): 155–161.
  10. Shah N, Kuntz DA, Rose DR. Golgi alpha-mannosidase II cleaves two sugars sequentially in the same catalytic site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(28): 9570–9575.
  11. Dunphy WG, Brands R, Rothman JE. Attachment of terminal N-acetylglucosamine to asparagine-linked oligosaccharides occurs in central cisternae of the Golgi stack. Cell. 1985; 40(2): 463–472.
  12. Horton JD, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. J Clin Invest. 2002; 109(9): 1125–1131.
  13. Nohturfft A, Yabe D, Goldstein JL, et al. Regulated step in cholesterol feedback localized to budding of SCAP from ER membranes. Cell. 2000; 102(3): 315–323.
  14. Yuan Y, Zhao L, Chen Y, et al. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) increase human mesangial foam cell formation by increasing Golgi SCAP glycosylation in vitro. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011; 301(1): F236–F243.
  15. Karasawa T, Takahashi M. Role of NLRP3 Inflammasomes in Atherosclerosis. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017; 24(5): 443–451.
  16. Geovanini GR, Libby P. Atherosclerosis and inflammation: overview and updates. Clin Sci (Lond). 2018; 132(12): 1243–1252.
  17. Li J, Huang M, Teoh H, et al. Panax quinquefolium saponins protects low density lipoproteins from oxidation. Life Sci. 1999; 64(1): 53–62.
  18. Barber RD, Harmer DW, Coleman RA, et al. GAPDH as a housekeeping gene: analysis of GAPDH mRNA expression in a panel of 72 human tissues. Physiol Genomics. 2005; 21(3): 389–395.
  19. Gamble W, Vaughan M, Kruth HS, et al. Procedure for determination of free and total cholesterol in micro- or nanogram amounts suitable for studies with cultured cells. J Lipid Res. 1978; 19(8): 1068–1070.
  20. Wang R, Wu W, Li W, et al. Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome Promotes Foam Cell Formation in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Atherogenesis Via HMGB1. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7(19): e008596.
  21. Chistiakov DA, Bobryshev YV, Orekhov AN. Macrophage-mediated cholesterol handling in atherosclerosis. J Cell Mol Med. 2016; 20(1): 17–28.
  22. Ye Q, Lei H, Fan Z, et al. Difference in LDL receptor feedback regulation in macrophages and vascular smooth muscle cells: foam cell transformation under inflammatory stress. Inflammation. 2014; 37(2): 555–565.
  23. Kartawijaya M, Han HW, Kim Y, et al. Genistein upregulates LDLR levels via JNK-mediated activation of SREBP-2. Food Nutr Res. 2016; 60: 31120.
  24. Jiang X, Yu J, Wang X, et al. Quercetin improves lipid metabolism via SCAP-SREBP2-LDLr signaling pathway in early stage diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019; 12: 827–839.
  25. Huang M, Zhao Z, Cao Q, et al. PAQR3 modulates blood cholesterol level by facilitating interaction between LDLR and PCSK9. Metabolism. 2019; 94: 88–95.
  26. Ronsein GE, Vaisar T. Inflammation, remodeling, and other factors affecting HDL cholesterol efflux. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2017; 28(1): 52–59.
  27. Catapano AL, Pirillo A, Norata GD. Vascular inflammation and low-density lipoproteins: is cholesterol the link? A lesson from the clinical trials. Br J Pharmacol. 2017; 174(22): 3973–3985.
  28. Ruan XZ, Varghese Z, Powis SH, et al. Dysregulation of LDL receptor under the influence of inflammatory cytokines: a new pathway for foam cell formation. Kidney Int. 2001; 60(5): 1716–1725.
  29. Zhong S, Zhao L, Li Q, et al. Inflammatory Stress Exacerbated Mesangial Foam Cell Formation and Renal Injury via Disrupting Cellular Cholesterol Homeostasis. Inflammation. 2015; 38(3): 959–971.
  30. Asalla S, Girada SB, Kuna RS, et al. Restoring Mitochondrial Function: A Small Molecule-mediated Approach to Enhance Glucose Stimulated Insulin Secretion in Cholesterol Accumulated Pancreatic beta cells. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 27513.
  31. Beloumi D, Blasco A, Muelas R, et al. Inflammatory Correlated Response in Two Lines of Rabbit Selected Divergently for Litter Size Environmental Variability. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(9).
  32. Assini JM, Mulvihill EE, Sutherland BG, et al. Naringenin prevents cholesterol-induced systemic inflammation, metabolic dysregulation, and atherosclerosis in Ldlr⁻/⁻ mice. J Lipid Res. 2013; 54(3): 711–724.
  33. Zhang Y, Ma KL, Liu J, et al. Inflammatory stress exacerbates lipid accumulation and podocyte injuries in diabetic nephropathy. Acta Diabetol. 2015; 52(6): 1045–1056.
  34. Ma KL, Liu J, Wang CX, et al. Increased mTORC1 activity contributes to atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout mice and in vascular smooth muscle cells. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168(6): 5450–5453.
  35. Hort MA, Straliotto MR, Netto PM, et al. Diphenyl diselenide effectively reduces atherosclerotic lesions in LDLr -/- mice by attenuation of oxidative stress and inflammation. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2011; 58(1): 91–101.
  36. Rose D. Structure, mechanism and inhibition of Golgi α-mannosidase II. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2012; 22(5): 558–562.
  37. Zhou C, Lei H, Chen Y, et al. Enhanced SCAP glycosylation by inflammation induces macrophage foam cell formation. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10): e75650.
  38. Scott DW, Black LL, Vallejo MO, et al. Increased sensitivity of Apolipoprotein E knockout mice to swainsonine dependent immunomodulation. Immunobiology. 2014; 219(7): 497–502.
  39. Orekhov AN. LDL and foam cell formation as the basis of atherogenesis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2018; 29(4): 279–284.
  40. Hu YW, Zhao JY, Li SF, et al. RP5-833A20.1/miR-382-5p/NFIA-dependent signal transduction pathway contributes to the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis and inflammatory reaction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015; 35(1): 87–101.
  41. Wang Bo, Rong X, Palladino END, et al. Phospholipid Remodeling and Cholesterol Availability Regulate Intestinal Stemness and Tumorigenesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2018; 22(2): 206–220.e4.
  42. Ye J, DeBose-Boyd RA. Regulation of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011; 3(7).
  43. Guo C, Chi Z, Jiang D, et al. Cholesterol Homeostatic Regulator SCAP-SREBP2 Integrates NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Cholesterol Biosynthetic Signaling in Macrophages. Immunity. 2018; 49(5): 842–856.e7.
  44. Lee SH, Lee JH, Im SS. The cellular function of SCAP in metabolic signaling. Exp Mol Med. 2020; 52(5): 724–729.
  45. Zhou C, He Q, Gan H, et al. Hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease exacerbates atherosclerosis via a mannosidases-mediated complex-type conversion of SCAP N-glycans. Kidney Int. 2021; 99(6): 1342–1353.
  46. Xu Xu, So JS, Park JG, et al. Transcriptional control of hepatic lipid metabolism by SREBP and ChREBP. Semin Liver Dis. 2013; 33(4): 301–311.
  47. Ru P, Guo D. microRNA-29 mediates a novel negative feedback loop to regulate SCAP/SREBP-1 and lipid metabolism. RNA Dis. 2017; 4(1).
  48. Han J, Li E, Chen L, et al. The CREB coactivator CRTC2 controls hepatic lipid metabolism by regulating SREBP1. Nature. 2015; 524(7564): 243–246.
  49. Lounis MA, Bergeron KF, Burhans MS, et al. Oleate activates SREBP-1 signaling activity in -deficient hepatocytes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2017; 313(6): E710–E720.
  50. Zheng ZG, Zhu ST, Cheng HM, et al. Discovery of a potent SCAP degrader that ameliorates HFD-induced obesity, hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance via an autophagy-independent lysosomal pathway. Autophagy. 2020 [Epub ahead of print]: 1–22.
  51. Liu J, Zhang F, Li C, et al. Synergistic activation of human LDL receptor expression by SCAP ligand and cytokine oncostatin M. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23(1): 90–96.
  52. Abidi P, Zhang F, Li C, et al. Blockage of the ERK signaling pathway abrogates the SCAP ligand-induced transcriptional activation of the LDL receptor gene in HepG2 cells. Int J Mol Med. 2005; 16(5): 779–785.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl