open access
The concentration of ethanol affects its penetration rate in bovine cardiac and hepatic tissues
Affiliations- School of Applied and Biomedical Sciences, Federation University Australia, 3350 Ballarat, Australia
- The Vascular Biology Unit, Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The Townsville Hospital, Townsville, Australia
open access
Abstract
Introduction. Ethanol is a commonly used fixative. Fixation of the inner layers of the tissue depends on the ability of the fixative to diffuse into the tissue. It is unknown whether the concentration of ethanol affects its penetration into tissues. This study aimed to compare the penetration rates of 50% and 100% ethanol into bovine heart and liver tissues. Materials and methods. The penetration distance and tissue shrinkage or expansion were measured by analysing the digital images of the heart and liver tissues before and after immersion in ethanol at 20°C for 2, 6, 24 or 30 hours. The penetration coefficients were calculated as the slope of the regression line using the linear regression function between the penetration distance and square root of fixation time. Differences in tissue shrinkage or expansion and penetration distance at various time points between the two concentrations of ethanol were analysed using a mixed design ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. Results. The penetration distance of 100% ethanol was significantly greater in both heart and liver tissues compared with that of 50% ethanol (n = 4, p < 0.05 for both). 100% ethanol shrank immersed liver tissue significantly more than 50% ethanol (p = 0.002), but the shrinkage of the heart tissue caused by two concentrations of ethanol did not significantly differ (p = 0.054). The greater penetration distance of 100% over 50% ethanol remained unchanged after normalising the penetration distance to the individual tissue’s shrinkage (n = 4, p < 0.001). The mean penetration coefficient of 100% ethanol was significantly greater than 50% ethanol in the heart tissue (0.906 vs. 0.442, p = 0.003) and in the liver tissue (0.988 vs. 0.622, p = 0.028). Conclusions. It was proven that in two types of tissue that substantially differ in histological structures, 100% ethanol penetrated tissue significantly faster than 50% ethanol.
Abstract
Introduction. Ethanol is a commonly used fixative. Fixation of the inner layers of the tissue depends on the ability of the fixative to diffuse into the tissue. It is unknown whether the concentration of ethanol affects its penetration into tissues. This study aimed to compare the penetration rates of 50% and 100% ethanol into bovine heart and liver tissues. Materials and methods. The penetration distance and tissue shrinkage or expansion were measured by analysing the digital images of the heart and liver tissues before and after immersion in ethanol at 20°C for 2, 6, 24 or 30 hours. The penetration coefficients were calculated as the slope of the regression line using the linear regression function between the penetration distance and square root of fixation time. Differences in tissue shrinkage or expansion and penetration distance at various time points between the two concentrations of ethanol were analysed using a mixed design ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. Results. The penetration distance of 100% ethanol was significantly greater in both heart and liver tissues compared with that of 50% ethanol (n = 4, p < 0.05 for both). 100% ethanol shrank immersed liver tissue significantly more than 50% ethanol (p = 0.002), but the shrinkage of the heart tissue caused by two concentrations of ethanol did not significantly differ (p = 0.054). The greater penetration distance of 100% over 50% ethanol remained unchanged after normalising the penetration distance to the individual tissue’s shrinkage (n = 4, p < 0.001). The mean penetration coefficient of 100% ethanol was significantly greater than 50% ethanol in the heart tissue (0.906 vs. 0.442, p = 0.003) and in the liver tissue (0.988 vs. 0.622, p = 0.028). Conclusions. It was proven that in two types of tissue that substantially differ in histological structures, 100% ethanol penetrated tissue significantly faster than 50% ethanol.
Keywords
fixative; ethanol; concentration; penetration coefficient; penetration rate
Supp./Additional Files (1)
About this articleTitle
The concentration of ethanol affects its penetration rate in bovine cardiac and hepatic tissues
Journal
Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica
Issue
Article type
Original paper
Pages
92-97
Published online
2018-06-04
Page views
2711
Article views/downloads
1535
DOI
Pubmed
Bibliographic record
Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2018;56(2):92-97.
Keywords
fixative
ethanol
concentration
penetration coefficient
penetration rate
Authors
Matthew Dunster-Jones
Michelle Steicke
James Mackie
Rachel Guthrie
Tam Nguyen Dinh
Fahima Ahmady
Jonathan Golledge
Yutang Wang
References (15)- Evans D, Robinson M. What is histopatholgy. In: Orchard G, Nation B, editors. Histopathology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. PP 1-33.
- Cabrera NC, Espinoza JR, Vargas-Jentzsch P, et al. Alcohol-based solutions for bovine testicular tissue fixation. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2017; 29(1): 91–99.
- DEMPSTER WT. Rates of penetration of fixing fluids. Am J Anat. 1960; 107: 59–72.
- Harrison PT. An ethanol-acetic acid-formol saline fixative for routine use with special application to the fixation of non-perfused rat lung. Lab Anim. 1984; 18(4): 325–331.
- Mathieson W, Marcon N, Antunes L, et al. A Critical Evaluation of the PAXgene Tissue Fixation System: Morphology, Immunohistochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Proteomics. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016; 146(1): 25–40.
- Staff S, Kujala P, Karhu R, et al. Preservation of nucleic acids and tissue morphology in paraffin-embedded clinical samples: comparison of five molecular fixatives. J Clin Pathol. 2013; 66(9): 807–810.
- Carson FL, Hladik C. Histotechnology. 4th ed. Chicago: American Society for Clinical Pathology. ; 2014.
- Medawar PB. —The rate of penetration of fixatives. J R Microsc Soc. 1941;61(1-2. : 46–57.
- Start RD, Layton CM, Cross SS, et al. Reassessment of the rate of fixative diffusion. J Clin Pathol. 1992; 45(12): 1120–1121.
- Srinivasan M, Sedmak D, Jewell S. Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids. Am J Pathol. 2002; 161(6): 1961–1971.
- Buesa RJ. Histology without formalin? Ann Diagn Pathol. 2008; 12(6): 387–396.
- Alshammari MA, Alshammari TK, Laezza F. Improved Methods for Fluorescence Microscopy Detection of Macromolecules at the Axon Initial Segment. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016; 10: 5.
- Williams JH, Mepham BL, Wright DH. Tissue preparation for immunocytochemistry. J Clin Pathol. 1997; 50(5): 422–428.
- Buesa RJ, Peshkov MV. How much formalin is enough to fix tissues? Ann Diagn Pathol. 2012; 16(3): 202–209.
- Docquier PL, Paul L, Cartiaux O, et al. Formalin fixation could interfere with the clinical assessment of the tumor-free margin in tumor surgery: magnetic resonance imaging-based study. Oncology. 2010; 78(2): 115–124.
