open access
Crossectomy as a method of pulmonary embolism prevention. Could it be a hazardous treatment?
open access
Abstract
Material and methods: 59 patients (22 men, 37 women), mean age 62 years (29–77) suffering from ASPh were analyzed. All Doppler duplex examinations were carried out by one investigator. In 4 cases, concomitant DVT of the same limb on crural level was found. A crossectomy was performed under local anaesthesia. If a thrombus was present in the deep veins (femoral, iliac), the patients were excluded from crossectomy.
Results: In 50 patients (85%) crossectomy was easy to perform because no thrombus was found in the most proximal part of LSV. An intraoperative evaluation revealed the presence of a thrombus at the sapheno-femoral junction in 9 cases (15%) but this had been recognized by previous doppler duplex in 5 cases (8%) only. In those patients, a thrombectomy at the saphenofemoral junction level and a crossectomy was defined as having a high risk of fragmentation during the procedure. A Fogarty catheter was routinely used. We did not notice any case of pulmonary embolisation perioperatvely.
Conclusion: A crossectomy in ascending saphenous phlebitis is hazardous in 15% of cases. A crossectomy is recommended as a safe and advisable method, in experienced hands of preventing pulmonary embolism.
Abstract
Material and methods: 59 patients (22 men, 37 women), mean age 62 years (29–77) suffering from ASPh were analyzed. All Doppler duplex examinations were carried out by one investigator. In 4 cases, concomitant DVT of the same limb on crural level was found. A crossectomy was performed under local anaesthesia. If a thrombus was present in the deep veins (femoral, iliac), the patients were excluded from crossectomy.
Results: In 50 patients (85%) crossectomy was easy to perform because no thrombus was found in the most proximal part of LSV. An intraoperative evaluation revealed the presence of a thrombus at the sapheno-femoral junction in 9 cases (15%) but this had been recognized by previous doppler duplex in 5 cases (8%) only. In those patients, a thrombectomy at the saphenofemoral junction level and a crossectomy was defined as having a high risk of fragmentation during the procedure. A Fogarty catheter was routinely used. We did not notice any case of pulmonary embolisation perioperatvely.
Conclusion: A crossectomy in ascending saphenous phlebitis is hazardous in 15% of cases. A crossectomy is recommended as a safe and advisable method, in experienced hands of preventing pulmonary embolism.
Keywords
ascending saphenophlebitis; saphenofemoral junction; crossectomy; pulmonary embolisation


Title
Crossectomy as a method of pulmonary embolism prevention. Could it be a hazardous treatment?
Journal
Chirurgia Polska (Polish Surgery)
Issue
Pages
27-30
Published online
2005-05-06
Page views
2086
Article views/downloads
1414
Bibliographic record
Chirurgia Polska 2005;7(1):27-30.
Keywords
ascending saphenophlebitis
saphenofemoral junction
crossectomy
pulmonary embolisation
Authors
Andrzej Cencora
Maciej Chwała
Andrzej Kostka
Marek Piwowarczyk