Vol 29, No 4 (2022)
Research Letter
Published online: 2022-05-24

open access

Page views 4699
Article views/downloads 521
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

clinicAL CARDIOLOGY

research letter

Cardiology Journal

2022, Vol. 29, No. 4, 706–709

DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0027

Copyright © 2022 Via Medica

ISSN 1897–5593

eISSN 1898018X

Assessment of the physical performance in children with preexcitation syndrome, before and after catheter ablation of the accessory pathway: A pilot study

Tomasz M. Książczyk1Radosław Pietrzak1Piotr Lodziński2Paweł Balsam2Marcin Grabowski2Bożena Werner1
21st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
215748.png

Address for correspondence: Prof. Bożena Werner, Department of Pediatric Cardiology and General Pediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Żwirki i Wigury 63A, 02091 Warszawa, Poland, tel/fax: +48 22 317-95-88, e-mail: bozena.werner@wum.edu.pl

Received: 27.02.2022 Accepted: 24.04.2022 Early publication date: 24.05.2022

This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.

Recently more interest has been given to the phenomenon of dyssynchrony of ventricular activation caused by the fusion of the intrinsic and antegrade conduction via the accessory pathway in patients with preexcitation syndrome. It has been noted that septal and right sided pathways were proven to have the main impact on the left ventricle dyssynchrony and causing dilated cardiomyopathy that can be reversible with either pharmacological or catheter ablation [1–9]. The aim of this study was to assess whether in children diagnosed with preexcitation syndrome, the key physical performance parameters assessed with the cardio-pulmonary exercise test (CPET) improves following successful catheter ablation of the accessory pathway.

The study group consisted of 14 children, 11 boys and 3 girls aged 816 years (12.7 mean), diagnosed with preexcitation syndrome, both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, who were referred to our department for electrophysiologic (EP) study and ablation. All patients underwent routine assessment with 12-lead-electrocardiogram (ECG), 24-hour Holter ECG and echocardiography. Only patients with no associated cardiac anomalies were included into the study. A CPET according to the RAMP15 protocol was performed before and 34 months after the ablation.

Patients in the study group were examined using EPIQ ultrasound system (Philips). Standard protocol was used with routine measurements according to clinical practice and international guidelines.

The CPET was performed using the upright sitting cycle-ergometer according to the RAMP15 protocol. 12-lead-ECG was recorded and analyzed throughout the entire test and behavior of the delta wave was observed. Breath-by-breath measurement of the oxygen uptake (VO2) and carbon dioxide (VCO2) elimination was performed continuously together with respiratory exchange ratio (RER). To calculate the VO2max, measurement at the VO2 plateau during maximal exercise was used, alternatively the maximal VO2 value at the peak exercise if the plateau was not observed. The oxygen pulse (O2-pulse) was calculated by dividing VO2 by heart rate measured at any point and then at the maximal exercise. Anaerobic threshold was calculated by the V-slope method. Workload expressed in Watts was recorded at the peak of exercise. Patients were verbally encouraged to continue the effort with voluntary termination at the patient’s exhaustion.

Patients were qualified for the invasive treatment based on the clinical assessment and parent’s/ /patient’s decision only. All patients underwent invasive EP study and radiofrequency-ablation under general anaesthesia, using three-dimensional--mapping system (CARTO). Only patients with successful removal of the accessory pathway (AP) were included into the study.

To examine the differences in the values of dependent variables between groups containing patients before and after ablation multiple t-Student tests for dependent samples were performed. Only complete cases for each continuous variable were chosen and then the normality assumption was checked using skewness values. For each group mean (M), standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) with lower (LL) and upper (UL) limits were shown. As the effect size coefficient Cohen’s d was used. The global significance level was a = 0.05.

The echocardiography for all patients in the study group showed a normal heart structure, normal left ventricular size, and function within normal values. There were no statistically significant differences in echocardiographic measurements before and after the ablation procedure.

All patients both before and after the ablation achieved maximal effort, with RER ≥ 1.0 during the CPET with no differences regarding maximal heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic, blood pressure, exercise time, anaerobic threshold, VO2/work and VE/CO2 ratios. After the ablation patients showed significantly higher values of O2-pulse (p = 0.002), total VO2max (L/min) with p = 0.013 and achieved higher workload during exercise (p = 0.001). The measurement of the VO2max expressed in mL/kg/ /min did not differ significantly.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Comparison of the cardio-pulmonary exercise test (CPET) and echocardiography results before and after the accessory pathway ablation.

Group

M

SD

95% CI

t

p

Cohen’s d

LL

UL

CPET parameters

VO2max [mL/kg/min]

Before

36.25

8.08

32.02

40.48

1.60

0.134

0.44

After

38.45

7.61

34.46

42.44

VO2max [L/min]

Before

2.05

0.51

1.77

2.32

2.89

0.013*

0.84

After

2.28

0.62

1.95

2.62

RQ (RER)

Before

1.09

0.08

1.05

1.13

0.57

0.579

0.16

After

1.10

0.09

1.05

1.15

VE/VCO2

Before

26.17

4.31

23.92

28.43

1.46

0.169

0.4

After

27.14

3.73

25.18

29.09

O2 pulse [mL/beat]

Before

10.92

3.21

9.24

12.60

3.74

0.002*

1.04

After

12.46

3.74

10.51

14.42

Workload [watt]

Before

143.57

45.84

119.56

167.59

4.18

0.001*

1.16

After

163.93

42.21

141.82

186.04

VO2/Work [mL/min/watt]

Before

11.17

1.46

10.40

11.94

0.60

0.558

0.17

After

11.47

1.21

10.84

12.10

Time [s]

Before

572.00

177.80

478.86

665.14

1.95

0.073

0.54

After

621.07

166.37

533.93

708.22

AT [mL/kg/min]

Before

18.12

4.39

15.63

20.60

0.70

0.501

0.21

After

18.89

3.25

17.05

20.73

AT [L/min]

Before

1.01

0.33

0.83

1.19

0.80

0.437

0.23

After

1.06

0.24

0.94

1.19

HR at peak effort [bpm]

Before

180.07

21.54

168.79

191.36

0.40

0.696

0.11

After

182.14

9.69

177.06

187.22

BP systolic at peak effort [mmHg]

Before

After

159.00

165.43

16.80

16.69

150.20

156.69

167.80

174.17

1.28

0.224

0.35

BP diastolic at peak effort [mmHg]

Before

After

70.23

58.23

19.22

13.58

59.78

50.85

80.68

65.61

1.63

0.129

0.47

Echocardiography parameters

RVIDd [mm]

Before

18.50

3.32

16.76

20.24

0.04

0.969

0.01

After

18.53

3.49

16.70

20.36

IVSd [mm]

Before

7.15

1.59

6.28

8.01

1.05

0.312

0.30

After

7.42

1.68

6.50

8.33

LVIDd [mm]

Before

47.80

4.87

45.25

50.35

0.85

0.412

0.24

After

47.25

4.43

44.93

49.57

EF [%]

Before

70.84

4.78

68.33

73.34

0.99

0.340

0.27

After

69.21

3.51

67.37

71.05

SF [%]

Before

39.15

2.85

37.60

40.70

0.52

0.611

0.15

The present study shows that children with preexcitation syndrome improved the key parameters describing the physical performance following the successful catheter ablation of the accessory pathway. Following the ablation patients achieved higher VO2max, O2-pulse and workload during the exercise. The total VO2 measurement improved however while expressed with relation to the body weight, failed to differ significantly. That could be an effect of a small study group, or body weight may play a role in VO2 measurement. Exercise time was longer after the ablation, which correlates with higher workload, however it failed to differ statistically (p = 0.07; Cohen’s d = 0.54), likely an effect of a small study group.

VO2max is described by a Fick equation as a result of the cardiac output (CO) and maximal arterio-venous oxygen difference: VO2 = COx(a-v)O2. As the oxygen extraction is not affected in patients with cardiovascular problems, VO2max mostly depends on the CO. O2-pulse is the ratio between the VO2 and HR, and it is a measure of the stroke volume (SV) during the exercise:

VO2 = COx(a-v)O2 = (SVxHR)x(a-v)O2;

VO2/HR = [SVxHRx(a-v)O2]/HR = SVx(a-v)O2.

In a recent study it was shown that in children with asymptomatic preexcitation, major physical performance parameters measured by the CPET (VO2max, O2-pulse) are diminished when compared to the healthy controls, and that effect was stronger in patients with persistent delta-wave throughout the exercise [10].

Multiple studies proved that mechanical dyssynchrony is present in patients with preexcitation and could even lead to dilated cardiomyopathy which resolves following successful ablation [1–9]. Therefore, a hypothesis postulated herein is that in the state of the physical activity the dyssynchronous activation of the cardiac muscle could be affecting the stroke volume and CO and contributing to the diminution of VO2max and O2-pulse. Successful removal of the AP should then restore cardiac synchrony and improve oxygen consumption during exercise. The current results seem to confirm this hypothesis.

Results of the study show that in children with preexcitation the key parameters improve after the successful ablation of the accessory pathway. Results are encouraging and further investigations are needed to fully explain the present findings.

Interpretation of the results must be careful as the study group is small and does not allow for more detailed analysis of the subgroups

Conflict of interest: None declared

References

  1. Fazio G, Mongiovi’ M, Sutera L, et al. Segmental dys- kinesia in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: a possible cause of dilatative cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. 2008; 123(2): e31– –e34, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.11.109, indexed in Pubmed: 17292982.
  2. Tomaske M, Janousek J, Rázek V, et al. Adverse effects of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with right septal or posteroseptal accessory pathways on cardiac function. Europace. 2008; 10(2): 181–189, doi: 10.1093/europace/eun005, indexed in Pubmed: 18256123.
  3. De Boeck BWL, Teske AJ, Leenders GE, et al. Detection and quantification by deformation imaging of the functional impact of septal compared to free wall preexcitation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2010; 106(4): 539–546.e2, doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.066, indexed in Pubmed: 20691313.
  4. Kwon BoS, Bae EJ, Kim GiB, et al. Septal dyskinesia and global left ventricular dysfunction in pediatric Wolff-Parkinson--White syndrome with septal accessory pathway. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21(3): 290–295, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01612.x, indexed in Pubmed: 19804548.
  5. Udink ten Cate FEA, Kruessell MA, Wagner K, et al. Dilated cardiomyopathy in children with ventricular preexcitation: the location of the accessory pathway is predictive of this association. J Electrocardiol. 2010; 43(2): 146–154, doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.09.007, indexed in Pubmed: 19879594.
  6. Dai CC, Guo BJ, Li WX, et al. Dyssynchronous ventricular contraction in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: a risk factor for the development of dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Pediatr. 2013; 172(11): 1491–1500, doi: 10.1007/s00431-013-2070-z, indexed in Pubmed: 23812508.
  7. Dai C, Guo B, Li W, et al. The effect of ventricular pre-excitation on ventricular wall motion and left ventricular systolic function. Europace. 2018; 20(7): 1175–1181, doi: 10.1093/europace/eux242, indexed in Pubmed: 29016834.
  8. Lee HJ, Uhm JS, Hong YJ, et al. Altered myocardial characteristics of the preexcited segment in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: A pilot study with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS One. 2018; 13(6): e0198218, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198218, indexed in Pubmed: 29856866.
  9. Guo B, Dai C, Li Q, et al. Hazards of ventricular pre-excitation to left ventricular systolic function and ventricular wall motion in children: analysis of 25 cases. Cardiol Young. 2019; 29(3): 380–388, doi: 10.1017/S1047951118002500, indexed in Pubmed: 30767835.
  10. Książczyk TM, Jaroń A, Pietrzak R, et al. Assessment of the physical performance in children with asymptomatic pre-excitation. Europace. 2022; 24(5): 855–859, doi: 10.1093/europace/euab171, indexed in Pubmed: 34648619.