open access

Vol 29, No 5 (2022)
Original Article
Submitted: 2021-11-25
Accepted: 2022-02-14
Published online: 2022-03-22
Get Citation

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy in a long-term follow-up after heart transplantation: Role of remnant cholesterol in residual inflammation

Emyal Alyaydin1, Christian Pogoda1, Angelo Dell`Aquila2, Sven Martens2, Izabela Tuleta1, Holger Reinecke1, Juergen R. Sindermann12
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0013
·
Pubmed: 35373329
·
Cardiol J 2022;29(5):782-790.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Cardiology I, Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Disease, Heart Failure, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
  2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany

open access

Vol 29, No 5 (2022)
Original articles — Clinical cardiology
Submitted: 2021-11-25
Accepted: 2022-02-14
Published online: 2022-03-22

Abstract

Background: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major prognosis limiting factor in heart transplantation (HTx). Disease development and progression are influenced by multiple determinants, but the role of remnant cholesterol (RC) in CAV has not yet been investigated. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the prevalence of CAV in a very long-term follow-up after orthotopic HTx and to examine the role of RC in residual inflammation despite secondary prevention.

Methods: Herein, is a retrospective analysis of patient data collected at the last follow-up visit in an outpatient setting. Additionally, RC levels were calculated based upon cholesterol profile.

Results: The study population consisted of 184 patients with a mean follow-up of 15.0 ± 6.8 years. More than 40% of the overall cohort had CAV at last follow-up. The mean RC was 27.1 ± 14.7 mg/dL. Patients with CAV had significantly elevated RC despite intensified statin treatment (p = 0.018). A positive correlation was observed between RC and interleukin-6 as a marker of residual inflammation. Elevated RC and prolonged follow-up emerged as significant factors related to CAV in a multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5–5.5, p = 0.001 and OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4–7.7, p = 0.006, respectively), whereas mycophenolate mofetil was inversely associated with CAV (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.9, p = 0.034).

Conclusions: Remnant cholesterol has proinflammatory properties and is associated with CAV development in HTx. Thus, RC should be concerned as an additional tool for risk assessment.

Abstract

Background: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major prognosis limiting factor in heart transplantation (HTx). Disease development and progression are influenced by multiple determinants, but the role of remnant cholesterol (RC) in CAV has not yet been investigated. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the prevalence of CAV in a very long-term follow-up after orthotopic HTx and to examine the role of RC in residual inflammation despite secondary prevention.

Methods: Herein, is a retrospective analysis of patient data collected at the last follow-up visit in an outpatient setting. Additionally, RC levels were calculated based upon cholesterol profile.

Results: The study population consisted of 184 patients with a mean follow-up of 15.0 ± 6.8 years. More than 40% of the overall cohort had CAV at last follow-up. The mean RC was 27.1 ± 14.7 mg/dL. Patients with CAV had significantly elevated RC despite intensified statin treatment (p = 0.018). A positive correlation was observed between RC and interleukin-6 as a marker of residual inflammation. Elevated RC and prolonged follow-up emerged as significant factors related to CAV in a multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5–5.5, p = 0.001 and OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4–7.7, p = 0.006, respectively), whereas mycophenolate mofetil was inversely associated with CAV (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.9, p = 0.034).

Conclusions: Remnant cholesterol has proinflammatory properties and is associated with CAV development in HTx. Thus, RC should be concerned as an additional tool for risk assessment.

Get Citation

Keywords

cardiac allograft vasculopathy, remnant cholesterol, statin treatment, heart transplantation

About this article
Title

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy in a long-term follow-up after heart transplantation: Role of remnant cholesterol in residual inflammation

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 29, No 5 (2022)

Article type

Original Article

Pages

782-790

Published online

2022-03-22

Page views

4397

Article views/downloads

647

DOI

10.5603/CJ.a2022.0013

Pubmed

35373329

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2022;29(5):782-790.

Keywords

cardiac allograft vasculopathy
remnant cholesterol
statin treatment
heart transplantation

Authors

Emyal Alyaydin
Christian Pogoda
Angelo Dell`Aquila
Sven Martens
Izabela Tuleta
Holger Reinecke
Juergen R. Sindermann

References (23)
  1. Mehra MR, Crespo-Leiro MG, Dipchand A, et al. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation of a standardized nomenclature for cardiac allograft vasculopathy-2010. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010; 29(7): 717–727.
  2. Fluschnik N, Geelhoed B, Becher PM, et al. Non-immune risk predictors of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: Results from the U.S. organ procurement and transplantation network. Int J Cardiol. 2021; 331: 57–62.
  3. Pober JS, Jane-wit D, Qin L, et al. Interacting mechanisms in the pathogenesis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014; 34(8): 1609–1614.
  4. Lund LH, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirtieth Official Adult Heart Transplant Report--2013; focus theme: age. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013; 32(10): 951–964.
  5. Costanzo MR, Dipchand A, Starling R, et al. The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010; 29(8): 914–956.
  6. Varbo A, Benn M, Tybjærg-Hansen A, et al. Elevated remnant cholesterol causes both low-grade inflammation and ischemic heart disease, whereas elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol causes ischemic heart disease without inflammation. Circulation. 2013; 128(12): 1298–1309.
  7. Stein DT, Devaraj S, Balis D, et al. Effect of statin therapy on remnant lipoprotein cholesterol levels in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21(12): 2026–2031.
  8. The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association . Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels. 9th ed Little, Brown & Co; Boston, Mass: 1994. pp. 253–256.
  9. Zakliczynski M, Nozynski J, Konecka-Mrowka D, et al. Different role of advanced glycation end products in pathology of transplanted heart in patients with or without diabetes mellitus type 2. Transplant Proc. 2009; 41(8): 3185–3189.
  10. Hoang K, Chen YD, Reaven G, et al. Diabetes and dyslipidemia. A new model for transplant coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1998; 97(21): 2160–2168.
  11. Bull D, Hunter G, Copeland J, et al. Peripheral vascular disease in heart transplant recipients. J Vasc Surg. 1992; 16(4): 546–554.
  12. Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, et al. 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(39): 2999–3058.
  13. Harris J, Teuteberg J, Shullo M. Optimal low-density lipoprotein concentration for cardiac allograft vasculopathy prevention. Clin Transplant. 2018; 32(5): e13248.
  14. Hognestad A, Endresen K, Wergeland R, et al. Plasma C-reactive protein as a marker of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42(3): 477–482.
  15. Varbo A, Nordestgaard BG. Remnant cholesterol and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in atherosclerosis progression and cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016; 36(11): 2133–2135.
  16. Ridker PM, MacFadyen JG, Glynn RJ, et al. Comparison of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol as biomarkers of residual risk in contemporary practice: secondary analyses from the Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(31): 2952–2961.
  17. Eisen HJ, Tuzcu EM, Dorent R, et al. Everolimus for the prevention of allograft rejection and vasculopathy in cardiac-transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(9): 847–858.
  18. Mociornita AG, Adamson MB, Tumiati LC, et al. Effects of everolimus and HLA-G on cellular proliferation and neutrophil adhesion in an in vitro model of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Am J Transplant. 2018; 18(12): 3038–3044.
  19. Azarbal B, Arbit B, Ramaraj R, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcomes with everolimus eluting stents for the treatment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. J Interv Cardiol. 2014; 27(1): 73–79.
  20. Kaczmarek I, Ertl B, Schmauss D, et al. Preventing cardiac allograft vasculopathy: long-term beneficial effects of mycophenolate mofetil. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006; 25(5): 550–556.
  21. Morise AP, Tennant J, Holmes SD, et al. The effect of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors on nonfasting remnant cholesterol in a real world population. J Lipids. 2018; 2018: 9194736.
  22. Kühl M, Binner C, Jozwiak J, et al. Treatment of hypercholesterolaemia with PCSK9 inhibitors in patients after cardiac transplantation. PLoS One. 2019; 14(1): e0210373.
  23. Broch K, Gude E, Karason K, et al. Cholesterol lowering with EVOLocumab to prevent cardiac allograft Vasculopathy in De-novo heart transplant recipients: Design of the randomized controlled EVOLVD trial. Clin Transplant. 2020; 34(9): e13984.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl