open access

Vol 29, No 5 (2022)
Original Article
Submitted: 2021-11-02
Accepted: 2022-05-25
Published online: 2022-06-09
Get Citation

Silent cerebral infarcts in patients with atrial fibrillation: Clinical implications of an imaging-adjusted CHA2DS2-VASc score

John P. Bretzman1, Andrew S. Tseng2, Jonathan Graff-Radford3, Hon-Chi Lee2, Samuel J. Asirvatham2, Michelle M. Mielke3, David S. Knopman3, Ronald C. Petersen3, Clifford R. Jack Jr.4, Prashanthi Vemuri4, Alejandro A. Rabinstein3, Christopher V. DeSimone2
·
Pubmed: 35703042
·
Cardiol J 2022;29(5):766-772.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
  2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
  3. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
  4. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States

open access

Vol 29, No 5 (2022)
Original articles — Clinical cardiology
Submitted: 2021-11-02
Accepted: 2022-05-25
Published online: 2022-06-09

Abstract

Background: The CHA2DS2-VASc score does not include silent infarcts on neuroimaging in stroke risk estimation for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The inclusion of silent infarcts into CHA2DS2-VASc scoring and its impact on stroke prophylaxis recommendations in patients with AF has not been previously studied. The present study sought to quantify the prevalence of silent infarcts in patients with AF and describe potential changes in management based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.

Methods: Participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging with AF and brain MRI were included. Silent infarcts were identified. “Standard” CHA2DS2-VASc scores were calculated for each subject based on clinical history alone and “imaging-adjusted” CHA2DS2-VASc scores based on evidence of cerebral infarction on MRI. Standard and imaging-adjusted scores were compared.

Results: One hundred and forty-seven participants (average age 77, 28% female) were identified with AF, MRI, and no clinical history of stroke. Overall, 41 (28%) patients had silent infarcts on MRI, corresponding with a 2-point increase in CHA2DS2-VASc score. Of these participants, only 39% (16/41) with silent infarct were on anticoagulation despite having standard CHA2DS2-VASc scores supportive of anticoagulation. After incorporating silent infarcts, 13% (19/147) would have an indication for periprocedural bridging compared to 0.6% (1/147) at baseline.

Conclusions: Incorporation of silent infarcts into the CHA2DS2-VASc score may change the risk- -benefit ratio of anticoagulation. It may also increase the number of patients who would benefit from periprocedural bridging. Future research should examine whether an anticoagulation strategy based on imaging-adjusted CHA2DS2-VASc scores could result in a greater reduction of stroke and cognitive decline.

Abstract

Background: The CHA2DS2-VASc score does not include silent infarcts on neuroimaging in stroke risk estimation for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The inclusion of silent infarcts into CHA2DS2-VASc scoring and its impact on stroke prophylaxis recommendations in patients with AF has not been previously studied. The present study sought to quantify the prevalence of silent infarcts in patients with AF and describe potential changes in management based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.

Methods: Participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging with AF and brain MRI were included. Silent infarcts were identified. “Standard” CHA2DS2-VASc scores were calculated for each subject based on clinical history alone and “imaging-adjusted” CHA2DS2-VASc scores based on evidence of cerebral infarction on MRI. Standard and imaging-adjusted scores were compared.

Results: One hundred and forty-seven participants (average age 77, 28% female) were identified with AF, MRI, and no clinical history of stroke. Overall, 41 (28%) patients had silent infarcts on MRI, corresponding with a 2-point increase in CHA2DS2-VASc score. Of these participants, only 39% (16/41) with silent infarct were on anticoagulation despite having standard CHA2DS2-VASc scores supportive of anticoagulation. After incorporating silent infarcts, 13% (19/147) would have an indication for periprocedural bridging compared to 0.6% (1/147) at baseline.

Conclusions: Incorporation of silent infarcts into the CHA2DS2-VASc score may change the risk- -benefit ratio of anticoagulation. It may also increase the number of patients who would benefit from periprocedural bridging. Future research should examine whether an anticoagulation strategy based on imaging-adjusted CHA2DS2-VASc scores could result in a greater reduction of stroke and cognitive decline.

Get Citation

Keywords

anticoagulation, atrial fibrillation, bridging, magnetic resonance imaging, silent infarct

About this article
Title

Silent cerebral infarcts in patients with atrial fibrillation: Clinical implications of an imaging-adjusted CHA2DS2-VASc score

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 29, No 5 (2022)

Article type

Original Article

Pages

766-772

Published online

2022-06-09

Page views

4663

Article views/downloads

619

DOI

10.5603/CJ.a2022.0055

Pubmed

35703042

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2022;29(5):766-772.

Keywords

anticoagulation
atrial fibrillation
bridging
magnetic resonance imaging
silent infarct

Authors

John P. Bretzman
Andrew S. Tseng
Jonathan Graff-Radford
Hon-Chi Lee
Samuel J. Asirvatham
Michelle M. Mielke
David S. Knopman
Ronald C. Petersen
Clifford R. Jack Jr.
Prashanthi Vemuri
Alejandro A. Rabinstein
Christopher V. DeSimone

References (20)
  1. Morin DP, Bernard ML, Madias C, et al. The state of the art: atrial fibrillation epidemiology, prevention, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016; 91(12): 1778–1810.
  2. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2019; 140(2): e125–e51.
  3. Lip GYH, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, et al. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010; 137(2): 263–272.
  4. Silent brain infarction in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. EAFT Study Group. European Atrial Fibrillation Trial. Neurology. 1996; 46(1): 159–165.
  5. Ezekowitz MD, James KE, Nazarian SM, et al. Silent cerebral infarction in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. The Veterans Affairs Stroke Prevention in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Circulation. 1995; 92(8): 2178–2182.
  6. Graff-Radford J, Madhavan M, Vemuri P, et al. Atrial fibrillation, cognitive impairment, and neuroimaging. Alzheimers Dement. 2016; 12(4): 391–398.
  7. Cha MJ, Park HE, Lee MH, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for silent ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation as determined by brain magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2014; 113(4): 655–661.
  8. Gaita F, Corsinovi L, Anselmino M, et al. Prevalence of silent cerebral ischemia in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation and correlation with cognitive function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62(21): 1990–1997.
  9. Kobayashi A, Iguchi M, Shimizu S, et al. Silent cerebral infarcts and cerebral white matter lesions in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012; 21(4): 310–317.
  10. Bernick C, Kuller L, Dulberg C, et al. Silent MRI infarcts and the risk of future stroke: the cardiovascular health study. Neurology. 2001; 57(7): 1222–1229.
  11. Vermeer SE, Hollander M, van Dijk EJ, et al. Silent brain infarcts and white matter lesions increase stroke risk in the general population: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Stroke. 2003; 34(5): 1126–1129.
  12. Vermeer SE, Prins ND, den Heijer T, et al. Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(13): 1215–1222.
  13. Roberts RO, Geda YE, Knopman DS, et al. The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: design and sampling, participation, baseline measures and sample characteristics. Neuroepidemiology. 2008; 30(1): 58–69.
  14. St Sauver JL, Grossardt BR, Yawn BP, et al. Use of a medical records linkage system to enumerate a dynamic population over time: the Rochester epidemiology project. Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 173(9): 1059–1068.
  15. Graff-Radford J, Aakre JA, Knopman DS, et al. Prevalence and Heterogeneity of Cerebrovascular Disease Imaging Lesions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020; 95(6): 1195–1205.
  16. Doherty JU, Gluckman TyJ, Hucker WJ, et al. 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Periprocedural Management of Anticoagulation in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69(7): 871–898.
  17. Moreau F, Asdaghi N, Modi J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: the more υou see the more you know. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2013; 3(1): 130–136.
  18. Smajlović D, Sinanović O. Sensitivity of the neuroimaging techniques in ischemic stroke. Med Arh. 2004; 58(5): 282–284.
  19. Bartholomay E, Polli I, Borges AP, et al. Prevalence of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014; 69(9): 615–620.
  20. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001; 285(18): 2370–2375.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl