open access

Vol 30, No 2 (2023)
Review Article
Submitted: 2021-10-22
Accepted: 2022-05-25
Published online: 2022-06-23
Get Citation

Atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: An update on renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system pathway blockade as a therapeutic and prevention target

Ioanna Koniari1, Eleni Artopoulou2, Virginia Mplani3, Francesk Mulita4, Evangelia Alexopoulou2, Emmanouil Chourdakis5, Mohammed Abo-Elseoud1, Grigorios Tsigkas3, Ioannis Panagiotopoulos6, Nicholas Kounis3, Dimitrios Velissaris2
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0061
·
Pubmed: 35762070
·
Cardiol J 2023;30(2):312-326.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Greece
  3. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Patras, Greece
  4. Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Patras, Greece
  5. Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Germany
  6. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Patras, Greece

open access

Vol 30, No 2 (2023)
Review articles — Clinical cardiology
Submitted: 2021-10-22
Accepted: 2022-05-25
Published online: 2022-06-23

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are two cardiovascular (CV) entities that affect millions
of individuals worldwide and their prevalence is translated into a significant impact on health care systems.
The common pathophysiological pathways that these two share have created an important clinical
interrelation, as the coexistence of HF and AF is associated with worse prognosis and treatment challenges.
Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), a critical mechanism in blood pressure (BP)
control, was proved to be involved in the pathogenesis of both conditions contributing to their further
coexistence. Successful control of BP is of great importance to the management of HF, crucial for the
prevention of arrhythmiogenic substrates, while RAAS antagonists may possibly affect the development
of new-onset AF as well. There are numerous studies that evaluated the effectiveness of RAAS blockade
in AF/HF population and despite comparable or modest results, there is a well-established suggestion
that RAAS blockers may contribute to a reduction of HF, CV events and recurrence of AF, along with
their potential effective role in the new-onset AF prophylaxis. Angiotensin receptor blockers, according to
the evidence, are more effective in that direction, followed by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors,
whereas the data on aldosterone antagonists are not encouraging, yet do have the potential of significant
CV disease modificators regardless of their effects on BP.

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are two cardiovascular (CV) entities that affect millions
of individuals worldwide and their prevalence is translated into a significant impact on health care systems.
The common pathophysiological pathways that these two share have created an important clinical
interrelation, as the coexistence of HF and AF is associated with worse prognosis and treatment challenges.
Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), a critical mechanism in blood pressure (BP)
control, was proved to be involved in the pathogenesis of both conditions contributing to their further
coexistence. Successful control of BP is of great importance to the management of HF, crucial for the
prevention of arrhythmiogenic substrates, while RAAS antagonists may possibly affect the development
of new-onset AF as well. There are numerous studies that evaluated the effectiveness of RAAS blockade
in AF/HF population and despite comparable or modest results, there is a well-established suggestion
that RAAS blockers may contribute to a reduction of HF, CV events and recurrence of AF, along with
their potential effective role in the new-onset AF prophylaxis. Angiotensin receptor blockers, according to
the evidence, are more effective in that direction, followed by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors,
whereas the data on aldosterone antagonists are not encouraging, yet do have the potential of significant
CV disease modificators regardless of their effects on BP.

Get Citation

Keywords

renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), aldosterone antagonists (AAs)

About this article
Title

Atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: An update on renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system pathway blockade as a therapeutic and prevention target

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 30, No 2 (2023)

Article type

Review Article

Pages

312-326

Published online

2022-06-23

Page views

3462

Article views/downloads

587

DOI

10.5603/CJ.a2022.0061

Pubmed

35762070

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2023;30(2):312-326.

Keywords

renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers
atrial fibrillation
heart failure
angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)
aldosterone antagonists (AAs)

Authors

Ioanna Koniari
Eleni Artopoulou
Virginia Mplani
Francesk Mulita
Evangelia Alexopoulou
Emmanouil Chourdakis
Mohammed Abo-Elseoud
Grigorios Tsigkas
Ioannis Panagiotopoulos
Nicholas Kounis
Dimitrios Velissaris

References (98)
  1. Braunwald E. Cardiovascular medicine at the turn of the millennium: triumphs, concerns, and opportunities. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337(19): 1360–1369.
  2. Wodchis WP, Bhatia RS, Leblanc K, et al. A review of the cost of atrial fibrillation. Value Health. 2012; 15(2): 240–248.
  3. Guha K, McDonagh T. Heart failure epidemiology: European perspective. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2013; 9(2): 123–127.
  4. Braunschweig F, Cowie MR, Auricchio A. What are the costs of heart failure? Europace. 2011; 13 (Suppl 2): ii13–ii17.
  5. Trulock KM, Narayan SM, Piccini JP. Rhythm control in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation: contemporary challenges including the role of ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64(7): 710–721.
  6. Stewart S, Hart C, Hole D, et al. A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Med. 2002; 113(5): 359–364.
  7. Mamas MA, Caldwell JC, Chacko S, et al. A meta-analysis of the prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation in chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009; 11(7): 676–683.
  8. Maisel WH, Stevenson LW. Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and rationale for therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91(6A): 2D–8D.
  9. Kotecha D, Piccini JP. Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: what should we do? Eur Heart J. 2015; 36(46): 3250–3257.
  10. Paul M, Poyan Mehr A, Kreutz R. Physiology of local renin-angiotensin systems. Physiol Rev. 2006; 86(3): 747–803.
  11. Pugliese NR, Masi S, Taddei S. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: a crossroad from arterial hypertension to heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2020; 25(1): 31–42.
  12. Ichihara A, Kobori H, Nishiyama A, et al. Renal renin-angiotensin system. Contrib Nephrol. 2004; 143: 117–130.
  13. Jaisser F, Farman N. Emerging roles of the mineralocorticoid receptor in pathology: toward new paradigms in clinical pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 2016; 68(1): 49–75.
  14. Luther J. Aldosterone in vascular and metabolic dysfunction. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2016; 25(1): 16–21.
  15. Díez J. Chronic heart failure as a state of reduced effectiveness of the natriuretic peptide system: implications for therapy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017; 19(2): 167–176.
  16. Petrie MC, Padmanabhan N, McDonald JE, et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and non-ACE dependent angiotensin II generation in resistance arteries from patients with heart failure and coronary heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37(4): 1056–1061.
  17. McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(11): 993–1004.
  18. Jhund PS, McMurray JJV. The neprilysin pathway in heart failure: a review and guide on the use of sacubitril/valsartan. Heart. 2016; 102(17): 1342–1347.
  19. Daniels L, Maisel A. Natriuretic peptides. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50(25): 2357–2368.
  20. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(33): 3021–3104.
  21. Kannel WB, Castelli WP, McNamara PM, et al. Role of blood pressure in the development of congestive heart failure. The Framingham study. N Engl J Med. 1972; 287(16): 781–787.
  22. Lloyd-Jones DM, Larson MG, Leip EP, et al. Lifetime risk for developing congestive heart failure: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2002; 106(24): 3068–3072.
  23. Lee D, Gona P, Vasan R, et al. Relation of disease pathogenesis and risk factors to heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction. Circulation. 2009; 119(24): 3070–3077.
  24. Lam CSP, Donal E, Kraigher-Krainer E, et al. Epidemiology and clinical course of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011; 13(1): 18–28.
  25. Ho JE, Enserro D, Brouwers FP, et al. Predicting heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2016; 9(6).
  26. Teo LY, Chan LL, Lam CS. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in hypertension. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2016; 31(4): 410–416.
  27. Yancy C, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62(16): 1495–1539.
  28. Fabiani I, Pugliese NR, La Carrubba S, et al. Interactive role of diastolic dysfunction and ventricular remodeling in asymptomatic subjects at increased risk of heart failure. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 35(7): 1231–1240.
  29. Gaasch WH, Zile MR. Left ventricular structural remodeling in health and disease: with special emphasis on volume, mass, and geometry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58(17): 1733–1740.
  30. Messerli FH, Rimoldi SF, Bangalore S. The transition from hypertension to Heart Failure: contemporary update. JACC Heart Fail. 2017; 5(8): 543–551.
  31. Tsioufis C, Georgiopoulos G, Oikonomou D, et al. Hypertension and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: connecting the dots. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2017; 16(1): 15–22.
  32. Gradman AH, Alfayoumi F. From left ventricular hypertrophy to congestive heart failure: management of hypertensive heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2006; 48(5): 326–341.
  33. Oakley C. Diagnosis and natural history of congested (dilated) cardiomyopathies. Postgrad Med J. 1978; 54(633): 440–450.
  34. Ather S, Bangalore S, Vemuri S, et al. Trials on the effect of cardiac resynchronization on arterial blood pressure in patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2011; 107(4): 561–568.
  35. Nair GM, Nery PB, Redpath CJ, et al. The role of renin angiotensin system in atrial fibrillation. J Atr Fibrillation. 2014; 6(6): 972.
  36. Goette A, Staack T, Röcken C, et al. Increased expression of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and angiotensin-converting enzyme in human atria during atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35(6): 1669–1677.
  37. de Graeff PA, Kingma JH, Viersma JW, et al. Acute hemodynamic and hormonal effects of ramipril in chronic congestive heart failure and comparison with captopril. Am J Cardiol. 1987; 59(10): 164D–170D.
  38. Chatterjee K, Parmley WW, Cohn JN, et al. A cooperative multicenter study of captopril in congestive heart failure: hemodynamic effects and long-term response. Am Heart J. 1985; 110(2): 439–447.
  39. Matsuda Y, Toma Y, Matsuzaki M, et al. Change of left atrial systolic pressure waveform in relation to left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Circulation. 1990; 82(5): 1659–1667.
  40. Nattel S, Maguy A, Le Bouter S, et al. Arrhythmogenic ion-channel remodeling in the heart: heart failure, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation. Physiol Rev. 2007; 87(2): 425–456.
  41. Reynolds MR, Essebag V, Zimetbaum P, et al. Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with recurrent episodes of atrial fibrillation: the FRACTAL registry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18(6): 628–633.
  42. Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, Oostra BA, Isaacs A, et al. ACE polymorphisms. Circ Res. 2006; 98(9): 1123–1133.
  43. Tsai CT, Lai LP, Lin JL, et al. Renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2004; 109(13): 1640–1646.
  44. Gensini F, Padeletti L, Fatini C, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme and endothelial nitric oxide synthase polymorphisms in patients with atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003; 26(1P2): 295–298.
  45. Liu T, Korantzopoulos P, Xu G, et al. Association between angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion gene polymorphism and atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Europace. 2010; 13(3): 346–354.
  46. Rigat B, Hubert C, Alhenc-Gelas F, et al. An insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene accounting for half the variance of serum enzyme levels. J Clin Invest. 1990; 86(4): 1343–1346.
  47. Darbar D, Motsinger AA, Ritchie MD, et al. Polymorphism modulates symptomatic response to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2007; 4(6): 743–749.
  48. Ueberham L, Bollmann A, Shoemaker MB, et al. Genetic ACE I/D polymorphism and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6(4): 732–737.
  49. Sun X, Yang J, Hou X, et al. Relationship between -344T/C polymorphism in the aldosterone synthase gene and atrial fibrillation in patients with essential hypertension. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2011; 12(4): 557–563.
  50. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Effects of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 145–53.
  51. Savarese G, Costanzo P, Cleland JG, et al. A meta-analysis reporting effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients without heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61(2): 131–142.
  52. Nieuwlaat R, Eurlings LW, Cleland JG, et al. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure in cardiology practice: reciprocal impact and combined management from the perspective of atrial fibrillation: results of the Euro Heart Survey on atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53(18): 1690–1698.
  53. Boldt LH, Rolf S, Huemer M, et al. Optimal heart failure therapy and successful cardioversion in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2008; 155(5): 890–895.
  54. Tadros R, Khairy P, Rouleau JL, et al. Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: drug therapies for rate and rhythm control. Heart Fail Rev. 2014; 19(3): 315–324.
  55. Chaugai S, Sherpa LY, Sepehry AA, et al. Effect of RAAS blockers on adverse clinical outcomes in high CVD risk subjects with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(26): e4059.
  56. Wachtell K, Lehto M, Gerdts E, et al. Angiotensin II receptor blockade reduces new-onset atrial fibrillation and subsequent stroke compared to atenolol: the Losartan Intervention For End Point Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45(5): 712–719.
  57. Schmieder RE, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, et al. Reduced incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation with angiotensin II receptor blockade: the VALUE trial. J Hypertens. 2008; 26(3): 403–411.
  58. Du X, Ninomiya T, de Galan B, et al. Risks of cardiovascular events and effects of routine blood pressure lowering among patients with type 2 diabetes and atrial fibrillation: results of the ADVANCE study. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30(9): 1128–1135.
  59. Yusuf S, Healey JS, Pogue J, et al. ACTIVE I Investigators. Irbesartan in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(10): 928–938.
  60. Disertori M, Latini R, Barlera S, et al. GISSI-AF Investigators. Valsartan for prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(16): 1606–1617.
  61. Arima H, Hart RG, Colman S, et al. Perindopril-based blood pressure-lowering reduces major vascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2005; 36(10): 2164–2169.
  62. McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(11): 993–1004.
  63. Cruden NLM, Fox KAA, Ludlam CA, et al. Neutral endopeptidase inhibition augments vascular actions of bradykinin in patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Hypertension. 2004; 44(6): 913–918.
  64. Rademaker MT, Charles CJ, Espiner EA, et al. Neutral endopeptidase inhibition: augmented atrial and brain natriuretic peptide, haemodynamic and natriuretic responses in ovine heart failure. Clin Sci (Lond). 1996; 91(3): 283–291.
  65. Wilkinson IB, McEniery CM, Bongaerts KH, et al. Adrenomedullin (ADM) in the human forearm vascular bed: effect of neutral endopeptidase inhibition and comparison with proadrenomedullin NH2-terminal 20 peptide (PAMP). Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001; 52(2): 159–164.
  66. Maric C, Zheng W, Walther T. Interactions between angiotensin ll and atrial natriuretic peptide in renomedullary interstitial cells: the role of neutral endopeptidase. Nephron Physiol. 2006; 103(3): p149–p156.
  67. Kuhn M. Molecular physiology of natriuretic peptide signalling. Basic Res Cardiol. 2004; 99(2): 76–82.
  68. Rademaker MT, Charles CJ, Espiner EA, et al. Combined neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in heart failure: role of natriuretic peptides and angiotensin II. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998; 31(1): 116–125.
  69. Trippodo NC, Fox M, Monticello TM, et al. Vasopeptidase inhibition with omapatrilat improves cardiac geometry and survival in cardiomyopathic hamsters more than does ACE inhibition with captopril. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999; 34(6): 782–790.
  70. Ruilope LM, Dukat A, Böhm M, et al. Blood-pressure reduction with LCZ696, a novel dual-acting inhibitor of the angiotensin II receptor and neprilysin: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active comparator study. Lancet. 2010; 375(9722): 1255–1266.
  71. Solomon SD, Zile M, Pieske B, et al. The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a phase 2 double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; 380(9851): 1387–1395.
  72. Sarrias A, Bayes-Genis A. Is sacubitril/valsartan (Also) an antiarrhythmic drug? Circulation. 2018; 138(6): 551–553.
  73. Chaugai S, Meng WY, Ali Sepehry A. Effects of RAAS blockers on atrial fibrillation prophylaxis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2016; 21(4): 388–404.
  74. Conen D, Tedrow UB, Koplan BA, et al. Influence of systolic and diastolic blood pressure on the risk of incident atrial fibrillation in women. Circulation. 2009; 119(16): 2146–2152.
  75. Goette A, Schön N, Kirchhof P, et al. Angiotensin II-antagonist in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (ANTIPAF) trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5(1): 43–51.
  76. Yamashita T, Inoue H, Okumura K, et al. Randomized trial of angiotensin II-receptor blocker vs. dihydropiridine calcium channel blocker in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with hypertension (J-RHYTHM II study). Europace. 2011; 13(4): 473–479.
  77. Du H, Fan J, Ling Z, et al. Effect of nifedipine versus telmisartan on prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2013; 61(4): 786–792.
  78. Galzerano D, Capogrosso C, Di Michele S, et al. New standards in hypertension and cardiovascular risk management: focus on telmisartan. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010; 6: 113–133.
  79. Khatib R, Joseph P, Briel M, et al. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) for primary prevention of non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 165(1): 17–24.
  80. Swedberg K, Zannad F, McMurray JJV, et al. Eplerenone and atrial fibrillation in mild systolic heart failure: results from the EMPHASIS-HF (Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization And SurvIval Study in Heart Failure) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59(18): 1598–1603.
  81. Pitt B, Williams G, Remme W, et al. The EPHESUS trial: eplerenone in patients with heart failure due to systolic dysfunction complicating acute myocardial infarction. Eplerenone Post-AMI Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2001; 15(1): 79–87.
  82. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(5): 373–498.
  83. Delcayre C, Swynghedauw B. Molecular mechanisms of myocardial remodeling. The role of aldosterone. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2002; 34(12): 1577–1584.
  84. Mayyas F, Alzoubi KH, Van Wagoner DR. Impact of aldosterone antagonists on the substrate for atrial fibrillation: aldosterone promotes oxidative stress and atrial structural/electrical remodeling. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168(6): 5135–5142.
  85. Bafford R, Sui XX, Park M, et al. Mineralocorticoid receptor expression in human venous smooth muscle cells: a potential role for aldosterone signaling in vein graft arterialization. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011; 301(1): H41–H47.
  86. Ito Y, Yamasaki H, Naruse Y, et al. Effect of eplerenone on maintenance of sinus rhythm after catheter ablation in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2013; 111(7): 1012–1018.
  87. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(10): 709–717.
  88. Gao X, Peng L, Adhikari CM, et al. Spironolactone reduced arrhythmia and maintained magnesium homeostasis in patients with congestive heart failure. J Card Fail. 2007; 13(3): 170–177.
  89. Kimura M, Ogawa H, Wakeyama T, et al. Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone on atrial conduction and remodeling in patients with heart failure. J Cardiol. 2011; 57(2): 208–214.
  90. Mulder P, Mellin V, Favre J, et al. Aldosterone synthase inhibition improves cardiovascular function and structure in rats with heart failure: a comparison with spironolactone. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29(17): 2171–2179.
  91. Hayashi M, Tsutamoto T, Wada A, et al. Immediate administration of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone prevents post-infarct left ventricular remodeling associated with suppression of a marker of myocardial collagen synthesis in patients with first anterior acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003; 107(20): 2559–2565.
  92. Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(14): 1309–1321.
  93. Dabrowski R, Sosnowski C, Michalak E, et al. A beneficial effect of 3-year spironolactone therapy supplementing atenolol therapy on the remodeling of atria and ventricles in a patient with permanent atrial fibrillation. Intern Emerg Med. 2009; 4(2): 171–173.
  94. Pitt B, Pfeffer MA, Assmann SF, et al. TOPCAT Investigators. Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(15): 1383–1392.
  95. Seccia TM, Letizia C, Muiesan ML, et al. Atrial fibrillation as presenting sign of primary aldosteronism: results of the Prospective Appraisal on the Prevalence of Primary Aldosteronism in Hypertensive (PAPPHY) Study. J Hypertens. 2020; 38(2): 332–339.
  96. Fagard RH, Celis H, Thijs L, et al. Regression of left ventricular mass by antihypertensive treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized comparative studies. Hypertension. 2009; 54(5): 1084–1091.
  97. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(36): 3599–3726.
  98. Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(35): 3427–3520.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl