open access

Vol 29, No 2 (2022)
Original Article
Submitted: 2021-09-21
Accepted: 2021-12-02
Published online: 2022-02-18
Get Citation

Elevated resting heart rate as independent in-hospital prognostic marker in COVID-19

Jennifer Vanoli1, Giacomo Marro2, Raffaella Dell'Oro1, Rita Facchetti1, Fosca Quarti-Trevano1, Domenico Spaziani3, Guido Grassi1
·
Pubmed: 35244197
·
Cardiol J 2022;29(2):181-187.
Affiliations
  1. Clinica Medica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
  2. Divisione di Medicina, Ospedale Bassini, Cinisello Balsamo, Milan, Italy
  3. Unità Operativa Complessa di Cardiologia, Magenta Hospital, Magenta, Milan, Italy

open access

Vol 29, No 2 (2022)
Original articles — COVID-19
Submitted: 2021-09-21
Accepted: 2021-12-02
Published online: 2022-02-18

Abstract

Background: Scarce and non-homogeneous data are available on the prognostic value of clinic heart rate (HR) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Methods: The present study evaluated in 389 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 the in-hospital prognostic value of resting HR, assessed over different time periods, i.e., at hospital admission, during initial 3 days and 7 days of hospitalization.
Results: Results show that assessment of this hemodynamic variable during hospitalization provides information on the clinical outcome of the patients, greater HR values being associated with a worse inhospital prognosis. The prognostic value of elevated HR during COVID-19: 1) was independent on other confounders such as age, gender, comorbidities and fever, 2) appeared to be strengthened by repeated measurements of HR during the initial 3/7 days of hospitalization, and 3) was detectable in patients in which the therapeutic intervention did not include drugs, such as beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, digoxin, ivabradine and antiarrhythmic compounds known to interfere with HR.
Conclusions: Heart rate may represent an important marker of a patient’s outcome in COVID-19.

Abstract

Background: Scarce and non-homogeneous data are available on the prognostic value of clinic heart rate (HR) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Methods: The present study evaluated in 389 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 the in-hospital prognostic value of resting HR, assessed over different time periods, i.e., at hospital admission, during initial 3 days and 7 days of hospitalization.
Results: Results show that assessment of this hemodynamic variable during hospitalization provides information on the clinical outcome of the patients, greater HR values being associated with a worse inhospital prognosis. The prognostic value of elevated HR during COVID-19: 1) was independent on other confounders such as age, gender, comorbidities and fever, 2) appeared to be strengthened by repeated measurements of HR during the initial 3/7 days of hospitalization, and 3) was detectable in patients in which the therapeutic intervention did not include drugs, such as beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, digoxin, ivabradine and antiarrhythmic compounds known to interfere with HR.
Conclusions: Heart rate may represent an important marker of a patient’s outcome in COVID-19.

Get Citation

Keywords

coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), heart rate, sympathetic nervous system, prognosis

About this article
Title

Elevated resting heart rate as independent in-hospital prognostic marker in COVID-19

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 29, No 2 (2022)

Article type

Original Article

Pages

181-187

Published online

2022-02-18

Page views

5178

Article views/downloads

801

DOI

10.5603/CJ.a2022.0009

Pubmed

35244197

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2022;29(2):181-187.

Keywords

coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
heart rate
sympathetic nervous system
prognosis

Authors

Jennifer Vanoli
Giacomo Marro
Raffaella Dell'Oro
Rita Facchetti
Fosca Quarti-Trevano
Domenico Spaziani
Guido Grassi

References (17)
  1. Iaccarino G, Grassi G, Borghi C, et al. Age and multimorbidity predict death among COVID-19 patients. Hypertension. 2020; 76(2): 366–372.
  2. Rosenthal N, Cao Z, Gundrum J, et al. Risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality in a US national sample of patients with COVID-19. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(12): e2029058.
  3. Ruscica M, Macchi C, Iodice S, et al. Prognostic parameters of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients-An Italian experience. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021; 51(9): e13629.
  4. Zheng Z, Peng F, Xu B, et al. Risk factors of critical and mortal COVID-19 cases: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2020; 81(2): e16–e25.
  5. Webb BJ, Peltan ID, Jensen P, et al. Clinical criteria for COVID-19 associated hyperinflammatory syndrome: a cohor study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020; 2: e754–e763.
  6. Shouman K, Vanichkachorn G, Cheshire WP, et al. Autonomic dysfunction following COVID-19 infection: an early experience. Clin Auton Res. 2021; 31(3): 385–394.
  7. Goldstein DS. The extended autonomic system, dyshomeostasis, and COVID-19. Clin Auton Res. 2020; 30(4): 299–315.
  8. Manolis AS, Manolis AA, Manolis TA, et al. COVID-19 infection and cardiac arrhythmias. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020; 30(8): 451–460.
  9. Kreutz R, Dobrowolski P, Prejbisz A, et al. Lifestyle, psychological, socioeconomic and environmental factors and their impact on hypertension during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. J Hypertens. 2021; 39(6): 1077–1089.
  10. Grassi G, Vailati S, Bertinieri G, et al. Heart rate as marker of sympathetic activity. J Hypertens. 1998; 16(11): 1635–1639.
  11. Seravalle G, Grassi G. Heart rate as cardiovascular risk factor. Postgrad Med. 2020; 132(4): 358–367.
  12. Liu W, Tao ZW, Wang L, et al. Analysis of factors associated with disease outcomes in hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020; 133(9): 1032–1038.
  13. Paranjpe I, Russak A, Freitas JDe, et al. Clinical characteristics of hospitalized covid-19 patients in New York city. MdRxiv. 2020.
  14. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020; 395(10229): 1054–1062.
  15. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(33): 3021–3104.
  16. Grassi G, Mark A, Esler M. The sympathetic nervous system alterations in human hypertension. Circ Res. 2015; 116(6): 976–990.
  17. Grassi G, Mancia G, Esler M. Central and peripheral sympathetic activation in heart failure. Cardiovascular Research. 2021.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl