Multimedialna platforma wiedzy medycznej Internetowa Księgarnia Medyczna Kalendarium Konferencji
Cardiology Journal
MENU
Shortcuts Submit an article CJ Guide for Authors (new) Recent articles Special collections Ahead Of Print APIS-S Online Calculator OCT Contrast Calculator Reviewers 2022

open access

Vol 29, No 1 (2022)
Study Protocol
Submitted: 2021-09-18
Accepted: 2021-10-19
Published online: 2021-11-15
View PDF Download PDF file View HTML
Get Citation

IMPACT of PCSK9 inhibition on clinical outcome in patients during the inflammatory stage of the SARS-COV-2 infection: Rationale and protocol of the IMPACT-SIRIO 5 study

Jacek Kubica1, Przemysław Podhajski1, Przemysław Magielski1, Aldona Kubica2, Piotr Adamski1, Roman Junik3, Jarosław Pinkas4, Eliano P. Navarese1
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0148
·
Pubmed: 34787891
·
Cardiol J 2022;29(1):140-147.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland
  2. Department of Health Promotion, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Poland
  3. Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland
  4. Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, School of Public Health, Warsaw, Poland

open access

Vol 29, No 1 (2022)
Study protocol — COVID-19
Submitted: 2021-09-18
Accepted: 2021-10-19
Published online: 2021-11-15

Abstract

Not available

Abstract

Not available

Full Text:

View PDF Download PDF file View HTML
Get Citation
About this article
Title

IMPACT of PCSK9 inhibition on clinical outcome in patients during the inflammatory stage of the SARS-COV-2 infection: Rationale and protocol of the IMPACT-SIRIO 5 study

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 29, No 1 (2022)

Article type

Study Protocol

Pages

140-147

Published online

2021-11-15

Page views

5931

Article views/downloads

904

DOI

10.5603/CJ.a2021.0148

Pubmed

34787891

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2022;29(1):140-147.

Authors

Jacek Kubica
Przemysław Podhajski
Przemysław Magielski
Aldona Kubica
Piotr Adamski
Roman Junik
Jarosław Pinkas
Eliano P. Navarese

References (65)
  1. Xie Y, Wang Z, Liao H, et al. Epidemiologic, clinical, and laboratory findings of the COVID-19 in the current pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2020; 20(1): 640.
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. Behrens EM, Koretzky GA. Review: cytokine storm syndrome: looking toward the precision medicine era. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69(6): 1135–1143.
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. Corradini E, Ventura P, Ageno W, et al. SIMI-COVID-19 Collaborators. Clinical factors associated with death in 3044 COVID-19 patients managed in internal medicine wards in Italy: results from the SIMI-COVID-19 study of the Italian Society of Internal Medicine (SIMI). Intern Emerg Med. 2021; 16(4): 1005–1015.
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. Grasselli G, Greco M, Zanella A, et al. COVID-19 Lombardy ICU Network. Risk factors associated with mortality among patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units in lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern Med. 2020; 180(10): 1345–1355.
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. Zangrillo A, Beretta L, Scandroglio AM, et al. COVID-BioB Study Group. Characteristics, treatment, outcomes and cause of death of invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS in Milan, Italy. Crit Care Resusc. 2020; 22(3): 200–211.
    PubMed
  6. Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8(5): 475–481.
    CrossRef
  7. Mulchandani R, Lyngdoh T, Kakkar AK. Deciphering the COVID-19 cytokine storm: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021; 51(1): e13429.
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. Del Valle DM, Kim-Schulze S, Huang HH, et al. An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival. Nat Med. 2020; 26(10): 1636–1643.
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. Mehta P, McAuley D, Brown M, et al. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020; 395(10229): 1033–1034.
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. Navarese EP, Kołodziejczak M, Dimitroulis D, et al. From proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 to its inhibition: state-of-the-art and clinical implications. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2016; 2(1): 44–53.
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(1): 111–188.
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. Ricci C, Ruscica M, Camera M, et al. PCSK9 induces a pro-inflammatory response in macrophages. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 2267.
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. Yang CL, Zeng YD, Hu ZX, et al. PCSK9 promotes the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines by macrophages to aggravate H/R-induced cardiomyocyte injury via activating NF-κB signalling. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2020; 39(2): 123–134.
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. Dwivedi DJ, Grin PM, Khan M, et al. Differential expression of PCSK9 modulates infection, inflammation, and coagulation in a murine model of sepsis. Shock. 2016; 46(6): 672–680.
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. Schuster S, Rubil S, Endres M, et al. Anti-PCSK9 antibodies inhibit pro-atherogenic mechanisms in APOE*3Leiden.CETP mice. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1): 11079.
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. Seidah NG, Benjannet S, Wickham L, et al. The secretory proprotein convertase neural apoptosis-regulated convertase 1 (NARC-1): liver regeneration and neuronal differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(3): 928–933.
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. Zaid A, Roubtsova A, Essalmani R, et al. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9): hepatocyte-specific low-density lipoprotein receptor degradation and critical role in mouse liver regeneration. Hepatology. 2008; 48(2): 646–654.
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. Ferri N, Ruscica M. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and metabolic syndrome: insights on insulin resistance, inflammation, and atherogenic dyslipidemia. Endocrine. 2016; 54(3): 588–601.
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. dos Santos C, Marshall JC. Bridging lipid metabolism and innate host defense. Sci Transl Med. 2014; 6(258): 258fs41.
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. Walley KR, Thain KR, Russell JA, et al. PCSK9 is a critical regulator of the innate immune response and septic shock outcome. Sci Transl Med. 2014; 6(258): 258ra143.
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. Giunzioni I, Tavori H, Covarrubias R, et al. Local effects of human PCSK9 on the atherosclerotic lesion. J Pathol. 2016; 238(1): 52–62.
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. Momtazi-Borojeni AA, Sabouri-Rad S, Gotto AM, et al. PCSK9 and inflammation: a review of experimental and clinical evidence. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019; 5(4): 237–245.
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. Gurbel PA, Navarese EP, Tantry US. Exploration of PCSK9 as a cardiovascular risk factor: is there a link to the platelet? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70(12): 1463–1466.
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. Luquero A, Badimon L, Borrell-Pages M. PCSK9 Functions in Atherosclerosis Are Not Limited to Plasmatic LDL-Cholesterol Regulation. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8: 639727.
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. Qi Z, Hu L, Zhang J, et al. PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9) enhances platelet activation, thrombosis, and myocardial infarct expansion by binding to platelet CD36. Circulation. 2021; 143(1): 45–61.
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. Tang Z, Jiang Lu, Peng J, et al. PCSK9 siRNA suppresses the inflammatory response induced by oxLDL through inhibition of NF-κB activation in THP-1-derived macrophages. Int J Mol Med. 2012; 30(4): 931–938.
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. Walley KR, Thain KR, Russell JA, et al. PCSK9 is a critical regulator of the innate immune response and septic shock outcome. Sci Transl Med. 2014; 6(258): 258ra143.
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. Ruscica M, Ferri N, Fogacci F, et al. Brisighella Heart Study Group. Circulating levels of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 and arterial stiffness in a large population sample: data from the brisighella heart study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6(5).
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. Bohula EA, Giugliano RP, Leiter LA, et al. Inflammatory and cholesterol risk in the FOURIER trial. Circulation. 2018; 138(2): 131–140.
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M, et al. ODYSSEY LONG TERM Investigators. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(16): 1489–1499.
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, et al. FOURIER Steering Committee and Investigators. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(18): 1713–1722.
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, et al. ODYSSEY OUTCOMES Committees and Investigators. Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(22): 2097–2107.
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. Navarese EP, Andreotti F, Raggi P, et al. Baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to predict the extent of cardiovascular benefit from lipid-lowering therapies: a review. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019; 5(1): 47–54.
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. Navarese EP, Kołodziejczak M, Petrescu A, et al. Role of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018; 16(6): 419–429.
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. Navarese EP, Robinson JG, Kowalewski M, et al. Association between baseline LDL-C level and total and cardiovascular mortality after LDL-C lowering: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2018; 319(15): 1566–1579.
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. Navarese EP, Kolodziejczak M, Schulze V, et al. Effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibodies in adults with hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 163(1): 40–51.
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. Siddiqi HK, Mehra MR. COVID-19 illness in native and immunosuppressed states: A clinical-therapeutic staging proposal. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020; 39(5): 405–407.
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. Romagnoli S, Peris A, De Gaudio AR, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: From the Bench to the Bedside. Physiol Rev. 2020; 100(4): 1455–1466.
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020; 395(10223): 497–506.
    CrossRef
  40. Fajgenbaum DC, June CH. Cytokine storm. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(23): 2255–2273.
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. Gautret P, Million M, Jarrot PA, et al. Natural history of COVID-19 and therapeutic options. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2020; 16(12): 1159–1184.
    CrossRefPubMed
  42. Santa Cruz A, Mendes-Frias A, Oliveira AI, et al. Interleukin-6 is a biomarker for the development of fatal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pneumonia. Front Immunol. 2021; 12: 613422.
    CrossRefPubMed
  43. Laguna-Goya R, Utrero-Rico A, Talayero P, et al. IL-6-based mortality risk model for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020; 146(4): 799–807.e9.
    CrossRefPubMed
  44. Aziz M, Fatima R, Assaly R. Elevated interleukin-6 and severe COVID-19: A meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020; 92(11): 2283–2285.
    CrossRefPubMed
  45. Grifoni E, Vannucchi V, Valoriani A, et al. Interleukin-6 added to CALL score better predicts the prognosis of COVID-19 patients. Intern Med J. 2021; 51(1): 146–147.
    CrossRefPubMed
  46. Herold T, Jurinovic V, Arnreich C, et al. Elevated levels of IL-6 and CRP predict the need for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020; 146(1): 128–136.e4.
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. Liu T, Zhang J, Yang Y, et al. The role of interleukin-6 in monitoring severe case of coronavirus disease 2019. EMBO Mol Med. 2020; 12(7): e12421.
    CrossRefPubMed
  48. Hadjadj J, Yatim N, Barnabei L, et al. Impaired type I interferon activity and inflammatory responses in severe COVID-19 patients. Science. 2020; 369(6504): 718–724.
    CrossRefPubMed
  49. Garbers C, Heink S, Korn T, et al. Interleukin-6: designing specific therapeutics for a complex cytokine. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018; 17(6): 395–412.
    CrossRefPubMed
  50. Scheller J, Chalaris A, Schmidt-Arras D, et al. The pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of the cytokine interleukin-6. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011; 1813(5): 878–888.
    CrossRefPubMed
  51. Angriman F, Ferreyro B, Burry L, et al. Interleukin-6 receptor blockade in patients with COVID-19: placing clinical trials into context. Lancet Respir Med. 2021; 9(6): 655–664.
    CrossRef
  52. Kalil AC, Patterson TF, Mehta AK, et al. ACTT-2 Study Group Members. Baricitinib plus remdesivir for hospitalized adults with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(9): 795–807.
    CrossRefPubMed
  53. Wijaya I, Andhika R, Huang I, et al. The use of Janus Kinase inhibitors in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021; 11: 100755.
    CrossRefPubMed
  54. Chen CX, Wang JJ, Li H, et al. JAK-inhibitors for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis. Leukemia. 2021; 35(9): 2616–2620.
    CrossRefPubMed
  55. Lescure FX, Honda H, Fowler R, et al. Sarilumab in patients admitted to hospital with severe or critical COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Resp Med. 2021; 9(5): 522–532.
    CrossRef
  56. Gordon AC, Mouncey PR, Al-Beidh F, et al. REMAP-CAP Investigators. Interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill patients with COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(16): 1491–1502.
    CrossRefPubMed
  57. Khan FA, Stewart I, Fabbri L, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of anakinra, sarilumab, siltuximab and tocilizumab for COVID-19. Thorax. 2021; 76(9): 907–919.
    CrossRefPubMed
  58. Chen CX, Hu F, Wei J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of tocilizumab in persons with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Leukemia. 2021; 35(6): 1661–1670.
    CrossRefPubMed
  59. Luquero A, Badimon L, Borrell-Pages M. PCSK9 functions in atherosclerosis are not limited to plasmatic ldl-cholesterol regulation. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8: 639727.
    CrossRefPubMed
  60. Qi Z, Hu L, Zhang J, et al. PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9) enhances platelet activation, thrombosis, and myocardial infarct expansion by binding to platelet CD36. Circulation. 2021; 143(1): 45–61.
    CrossRefPubMed
  61. www worldometers info. (accessed 2021).
  62. Kubica A. Self-reported questionnaires for a comprehensive assessment of patients after acute coronary syndrome. Med Res J. 2019; 4(2): 106–109.
    CrossRef
  63. Michalski P, Kasprzak M, Kosobucka A, et al. Sociodemographic and clinical determinants of the functioning of patients with coronary artery disease. Med Res J. 2021; 6(1): 21–27.
    CrossRef
  64. Buszko K, Pietrzykowski Ł, Michalski P, et al. Validation of the Functioning in Chronic Illness Scale (FCIS). Med Res J. 2018; 3(2): 63–69.
    CrossRef
  65. Kubica A, Kosobucka A, Michalski P, et al. Self-reported questionnaires for assessment adherence to treatment in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Med Res J. 2018; 2(4): 115–122.
    CrossRef

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl