open access

Vol 30, No 4 (2023)
Original Article
Submitted: 2020-11-16
Accepted: 2021-06-06
Published online: 2021-06-16
Get Citation

Ticagrelor effectively inhibits platelet aggregation in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia

Marek T. Tomala12, Aleksander Trąbka-Zawicki12, Andrzej Machnik12, Bartłomiej A. Nawrotek12, Wojciech Zajdel12, Ewa Ł. Stępień3, Jacek Legutko12, Krzysztof Żmudka12
·
Pubmed: 34165181
·
Cardiol J 2023;30(4):636-645.
Affiliations
  1. Jagiellonian University Medical College Institute of Cardiology, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Krakow, Poland
  2. Krakow Specialist Hospital named after John Paul II, Clinical Department of Interventional Cardiology, Krakow, Poland
  3. Department of Medical Physics, Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

open access

Vol 30, No 4 (2023)
Original articles — Clinical cardiology
Submitted: 2020-11-16
Accepted: 2021-06-06
Published online: 2021-06-16

Abstract

Background: Mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) is believed to reduce the effectiveness of antiplatelet
drugs. Effective dual-antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is mandatory
to avoid acute stent thrombosis. The effectiveness of ticagrelor in MTH-treated out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest (OHCA) survivors is still a matter of debate. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact
of MTH on the platelet-inhibitory effect of ticagrelor in comatose survivors of OHCA treated with primary
PCI.

Methods: Eighteen comatose survivors of OHCA with acute coronary syndrome undergoing immediate
PCI treated with MTH were compared with 14 patients with uncomplicated primary myocardial infarction
after PCI, matched for gender and age, in a prospective, single-center, observational study. Platelet
aggregation was evaluated using VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care testing at 3 time points: admission (T0),
during MTH (T1), and 48–72 h after rewarming (T2).

Results: Ticagrelor effectively inhibits platelet aggregation in OHCA patients subjected to MTH and
in all patients in the control group. The effectiveness of ticagrelor did not differ between the MTH group
and the control group (p = 0.581). In 2 cases in the MTH population, the platelet response to ticagrelor
was inadequate, and in one of them it remained insufficient during the re-warming phase. There was
no stent thrombosis in these patients.

Conclusions: The present study confirmed the effectiveness of ticagrelor to inhibit platelets in myocardial
infarction patients after OHCA treated with primary PCI undergoing hypothermia. The use of
cooling was not associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis.

Abstract

Background: Mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) is believed to reduce the effectiveness of antiplatelet
drugs. Effective dual-antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is mandatory
to avoid acute stent thrombosis. The effectiveness of ticagrelor in MTH-treated out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest (OHCA) survivors is still a matter of debate. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact
of MTH on the platelet-inhibitory effect of ticagrelor in comatose survivors of OHCA treated with primary
PCI.

Methods: Eighteen comatose survivors of OHCA with acute coronary syndrome undergoing immediate
PCI treated with MTH were compared with 14 patients with uncomplicated primary myocardial infarction
after PCI, matched for gender and age, in a prospective, single-center, observational study. Platelet
aggregation was evaluated using VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care testing at 3 time points: admission (T0),
during MTH (T1), and 48–72 h after rewarming (T2).

Results: Ticagrelor effectively inhibits platelet aggregation in OHCA patients subjected to MTH and
in all patients in the control group. The effectiveness of ticagrelor did not differ between the MTH group
and the control group (p = 0.581). In 2 cases in the MTH population, the platelet response to ticagrelor
was inadequate, and in one of them it remained insufficient during the re-warming phase. There was
no stent thrombosis in these patients.

Conclusions: The present study confirmed the effectiveness of ticagrelor to inhibit platelets in myocardial
infarction patients after OHCA treated with primary PCI undergoing hypothermia. The use of
cooling was not associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis.

Get Citation

Keywords

out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, platelet function, primary percutaneous coronary intervention, ticagrelor, VerifyNow

About this article
Title

Ticagrelor effectively inhibits platelet aggregation in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 30, No 4 (2023)

Article type

Original Article

Pages

636-645

Published online

2021-06-16

Page views

2279

Article views/downloads

773

DOI

10.5603/CJ.a2021.0064

Pubmed

34165181

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2023;30(4):636-645.

Keywords

out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
platelet function
primary percutaneous coronary intervention
ticagrelor
VerifyNow

Authors

Marek T. Tomala
Aleksander Trąbka-Zawicki
Andrzej Machnik
Bartłomiej A. Nawrotek
Wojciech Zajdel
Ewa Ł. Stępień
Jacek Legutko
Krzysztof Żmudka

References (44)
  1. Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JGP, et al. Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation. 2010; 81(11): 1479–1487.
  2. Dumas F, Cariou A, Manzo-Silberman S, et al. Immediate percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with better survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: insights from the PROCAT (Parisian Region Out of hospital Cardiac ArresT) registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3(3): 200–207.
  3. Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group. Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(8): 549–556.
  4. Erecinska M, Thoresen M, Silver IA. Effects of hypothermia on energy metabolism in Mammalian central nervous system. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003; 23(5): 513–530.
  5. Kern KB, Lotun K, Patel N, et al. Outcomes of comatose cardiac arrest survivors with and without st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: importance of coronary angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8(8): 1031–1040.
  6. Kander T, Schött U. Effect of hypothermia on haemostasis and bleeding risk: a narrative review. J Int Med Res. 2019; 47(8): 3559–3568.
  7. Trąbka-Zawicki A, Tomala M, Zeliaś A, et al. Adaptation of global hemostasis to therapeutic hypothermia in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Thromboelastography study. Cardiol J. 2019; 26(1): 77–86.
  8. Högberg C, Erlinge D, Braun OO. Mild hypothermia does not attenuate platelet aggregation and may even increase ADP-stimulated platelet aggregation after clopidogrel treatment. Thromb J. 2009; 7: 2.
  9. Ibrahim K, Christoph M, Schmeinck S, et al. High rates of prasugrel and ticagrelor non-responder in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2014; 85(5): 649–656.
  10. Gouffran G, Rosencher J, Bougouin W, et al. Stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Are the new P2Y12 inhibitors really more effective than clopidogrel? Resuscitation. 2016; 98: 73–78.
  11. Joffre J, Varenne O, Bougouin W, et al. Stent thrombosis: an increased adverse event after angioplasty following resuscitated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2014; 85(6): 769–773.
  12. Jiménez-Brítez G, Freixa X, Flores-Umanzor E, et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and stent thrombosis: Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention under mild therapeutic hypothermia. Resuscitation. 2017; 114: 141–145.
  13. Chisholm GE, Grejs A, Thim T, et al. Safety of therapeutic hypothermia combined with primary percutaneous coronary intervention after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015; 4(1): 60–63.
  14. Moudgil R, Al-Turbak H, Osborne C, et al. Superiority of ticagrelor over clopidogrel in patients after cardiac arrest undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. Can J Cardiol. 2014; 30(11): 1396–1399.
  15. Tilemann LM, Stiepak J, Zelniker T, et al. Efficacy of enteral ticagrelor in hypothermic patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016; 105(4): 332–340.
  16. Shah N, Chaudhary R, Mehta K, et al. Therapeutic Hypothermia and Stent Thrombosis: A Nationwide Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9(17): 1801–1811.
  17. Eyileten C, Soplinska A, Pordzik J, et al. Effectiveness of antiplatelet drugs under therapeutic hypothermia: a comprehensive review. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 106(5): 993–1005.
  18. Ratcovich H, Sadjadieh G, Andersson HB, et al. The effect of TIcagrelor administered through a nasogastric tube to COMAtose patients undergoing acute percutaneous coronary intervention: the TICOMA study. EuroIntervention. 2017; 12(14): 1782–1788.
  19. Steblovnik K, Blinc A, Mijovski MB, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and hypothermia: a randomized study. Circulation. 2016; 134(25): 2128–2130.
  20. Chyrchel B, Drożdż A, Długosz D, et al. Platelet reactivity and circulating platelet-derived microvesicles are differently affected by P2Y receptor antagonists. Int J Med Sci. 2019; 16(2): 264–275.
  21. Marcucci CE, Schoettker P. editors. Perioperative Hemostasis: Coagulation for Anesthesiologists. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin 2015.
  22. Accumetrics. VerifyNow. User Manual Company Technical Booklet. 2009;138.
  23. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007; 115(17): 2344–2351.
  24. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011; 123(23): 2736–2747.
  25. Aradi D, Storey RF, Komócsi A, et al. Expert position paper on the role of platelet function testing in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35(4): 209–215.
  26. Zeymer U, Bueno H, Granger CB, et al. Acute Cardiovascular Care Association position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A document of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020; 9(2): 183–197.
  27. Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Plakomyti TE, et al. Ticagrelor in clopidogrel-resistant patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012; 60(2): 332–333.
  28. Gremmel T, Müller M, Steiner S, et al. Chronic kidney disease is associated with increased platelet activation and poor response to antiplatelet therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013; 28(8): 2116–2122.
  29. Jeong KH, Cho JuH, Woo JS, et al. Platelet reactivity after receiving clopidogrel compared with ticagrelor in patients with kidney failure treated with hemodialysis: a randomized crossover study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015; 65(6): 916–924.
  30. Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Gkizas V, et al. Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5(6): 797–804.
  31. Bednar F, Kroupa J, Ondrakova M, et al. Antiplatelet efficacy of P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel, ticagrelor, clopidogrel) in patients treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest due to acute myocardial infarction. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016; 41(4): 549–555.
  32. Kander T, Dankiewicz J, Friberg H, et al. Platelet aggregation and clot formation in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest treated with induced hypothermia and dual platelet inhibition with aspirin and ticagrelor; a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2014; 18(5): 495.
  33. Penela D, Magaldi M, Fontanals J, et al. Hypothermia in Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61(6): 686–687.
  34. Montalescot G, van 't Hof AW, Montalescot G, et al. Prehospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(11): 1016–1027.
  35. Kozinski M, Pstragowski K, Kubica JM, et al. ACS network-based implementation of therapeutic hypothermia for the treatment of comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors improves clinical outcomes: the first European experience. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013; 21: 22.
  36. Casella G, Carinci V, Cavallo P, et al. Combining therapeutic hypothermia and emergent coronary angiography in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors: Optimal post-arrest care for the best patient. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015; 4(6): 579–588.
  37. Knafelj R, Radsel P, Ploj T, et al. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention and mild induced hypothermia in comatose survivors of ventricular fibrillation with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. Resuscitation. 2007; 74(2): 227–234.
  38. Akin I, Rehders TC, Kische S, et al. Diffuse coronary spasm during therapeutic hypothermia. Int J Cardiol. 2011; 148(3): 373–375.
  39. Alushi B, Ndrepepa G, Lauten A, et al. Hypothermia in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021; 110(1): 84–92.
  40. Wolfrum S, Pierau C, Radke PW, et al. Mild therapeutic hypothermia in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing immediate percutaneous coronary intervention. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36(6): 1780–1786.
  41. Zimmermann S, Flachskampf FA, Schneider R, et al. Mild therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction: long-term results in clinical practice. Clin Cardiol. 2013; 36(7): 414–421.
  42. Wang CH, Chen NC, Tsai MS, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia and the risk of hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94(47): e2152.
  43. Nielsen N, Wetterslev J, Cronberg T, et al. Targeted Temperature Management at 33°C versus 36°C after Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(23): 2197–2206.
  44. Polderman KH, Herold I. Therapeutic hypothermia and controlled normothermia in the intensive care unit: practical considerations, side effects, and cooling methods. Crit Care Med. 2009; 37(3): 1101–1120.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl