Vol 27, No 4 (2020)
Published online: 2020-09-10

open access

Page views 913
Article views/downloads 709
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

ISCHEMIA trial: Back to the future or forward to the past?

Ana Pardo Sanz, Pedro Marcos Alberca, José Luis Zamorano
Pubmed: 32929702
Cardiol J 2020;27(4):342-344.


Not available

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file


  1. Maron D, Hochman J, Reynolds H, et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(15): 1395–1407.
  2. Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, Bangalore S, et al. Baseline characteristics and risk profiles of participants in the ISCHEMIA randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2019; 4(3): 273–286.
  3. Newby DE, Adamson PD, Berry C, et al. SCOT-HEART Investigators. Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(10): 924–933.
  4. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(3): 407–477.
  5. Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Louvard Y. DECISION-CTO: A "negative" clinical trial? Really? Cardiol J. 2017; 24(3): 231–233.
  6. Lee HS, Lee JM, Nam CW, et al. Consensus document for invasive coronary physiologic assessment in Asia-Pacific countries. Cardiol J. 2019; 26(3): 215–225.
  7. Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Chen Y, Yu W, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of optical flow ratio for functional evaluation of coronary stenosis in a prospective series. Cardiol J. 2020 [Epub ahead of print].