open access

Vol 29, No 1 (2022)
Original Article
Submitted: 2019-12-26
Accepted: 2020-03-09
Published online: 2020-03-18
Get Citation

Does left ventricular reverse remodeling influence long-term outcomes in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy?

Marcelo Arruda Nakazone12, Ana Paula Otaviano3, Maurício Nassau Machado2, Reinaldo Bulgarelli Bestetti14
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0038
·
Pubmed: 32207838
·
Cardiol J 2022;29(1):44-52.
Affiliations
  1. Postgraduate Division, São José do Rio Preto Medical School, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil
  2. Hospital de Base, Fundação Faculdade Regional de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil
  3. Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
  4. University of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil

open access

Vol 29, No 1 (2022)
Original articles — Clinical cardiology
Submitted: 2019-12-26
Accepted: 2020-03-09
Published online: 2020-03-18

Abstract

Background: The impact of left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) on the prognosis of Chagas cardiomyopathy is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of LVRR can predict mortality in these patients.
Methods: From January 2000 to December 2010, the medical charts of 159 patients were reviewed. LVRR was defined as an increase of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a decrease of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDD) by two-dimensional echocardiography. No patient underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy or required mechanical ventricular assistance.
Results: At baseline, median (25th–75th) LVDD was 64 mm (59–70), and median LVEF was 33.2% (26.4–40.1). LVRR was detected in 24.5% of patients in a 40-month (26–64) median follow-up. In the LVRR group, LVDD decreased from 64 mm (59–68) to 60 mm (56–65; p < 0.001), and LVEF increased from 31.3% (24.1–39.0) to 42.5% (32.2–47.7; p < 0.001). However, LVRR was not associated with heart failure hospitalization, cardiogenic shock, heart transplantation, or mortality (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). The Cox proportional hazard model analysis identified only cardiogenic shock (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.51–3.85; p < 0.001) and serum sodium level (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.86–0.96; p < 0.001) as independent predictors of all-cause mortality.
Conclusions: Left ventricular reverse remodeling occurs in one quarter of patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy and have no impact on the outcomes of patients with this condition.

Abstract

Background: The impact of left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) on the prognosis of Chagas cardiomyopathy is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of LVRR can predict mortality in these patients.
Methods: From January 2000 to December 2010, the medical charts of 159 patients were reviewed. LVRR was defined as an increase of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a decrease of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDD) by two-dimensional echocardiography. No patient underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy or required mechanical ventricular assistance.
Results: At baseline, median (25th–75th) LVDD was 64 mm (59–70), and median LVEF was 33.2% (26.4–40.1). LVRR was detected in 24.5% of patients in a 40-month (26–64) median follow-up. In the LVRR group, LVDD decreased from 64 mm (59–68) to 60 mm (56–65; p < 0.001), and LVEF increased from 31.3% (24.1–39.0) to 42.5% (32.2–47.7; p < 0.001). However, LVRR was not associated with heart failure hospitalization, cardiogenic shock, heart transplantation, or mortality (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). The Cox proportional hazard model analysis identified only cardiogenic shock (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.51–3.85; p < 0.001) and serum sodium level (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.86–0.96; p < 0.001) as independent predictors of all-cause mortality.
Conclusions: Left ventricular reverse remodeling occurs in one quarter of patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy and have no impact on the outcomes of patients with this condition.

Get Citation

Keywords

left ventricular remodeling, heart failure, Chagas cardiomyopathy, prognosis, mortality

About this article
Title

Does left ventricular reverse remodeling influence long-term outcomes in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy?

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 29, No 1 (2022)

Article type

Original Article

Pages

44-52

Published online

2020-03-18

Page views

5853

Article views/downloads

1012

DOI

10.5603/CJ.a2020.0038

Pubmed

32207838

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2022;29(1):44-52.

Keywords

left ventricular remodeling
heart failure
Chagas cardiomyopathy
prognosis
mortality

Authors

Marcelo Arruda Nakazone
Ana Paula Otaviano
Maurício Nassau Machado
Reinaldo Bulgarelli Bestetti

References (46)
  1. Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) – fact sheet (revised in August 2012). Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2012; 87(51/52): 519–522.
  2. Lee BY, Bacon KM, Bottazzi ME, et al. Global economic burden of Chagas disease: a computational simulation model. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013; 13(4): 342–348.
  3. Bestetti RB, Cardinalli-Neto A. Sudden cardiac death in Chagas' heart disease in the contemporary era. Int J Cardiol. 2008; 131(1): 9–17.
  4. Vilas Boas LGC, Bestetti RB, Otaviano AP, et al. Outcome of Chagas cardiomyopathy in comparison to ischemic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 167(2): 486–490.
  5. Bestetti RB, Otaviano AP, Fantini JP, et al. Prognosis of patients with chronic systolic heart failure: Chagas disease versus systemic arterial hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168(3): 2990–2991.
  6. Pereira Nunes MC, Barbosa MM, Ribeiro AL, et al. Predictors of mortality in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: relevance of chagas disease as an etiological factor. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010; 63(7): 788–797.
  7. Barbosa AP, Cardinalli Neto A, Otaviano AP, et al. Comparison of outcome between Chagas cardiomyopathy and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011; 97(6): 517–525.
  8. Bestetti RB, Rossi MA. A rationale approach for mortality risk stratification in Chagas' heart disease. Int J Cardiol. 1997; 58(3): 199–209.
  9. Amorim S, Rodrigues J, Campelo M, et al. Left ventricular reverse remodeling in dilated cardiomyopathy- maintained subclinical myocardial systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 33(5): 605–613.
  10. Arnold RH, Kotlyar E, Hayward C, et al. Relation between heart rate, heart rhythm, and reverse left ventricular remodelling in response to carvedilol in patients with chronic heart failure: a single centre, observational study. Heart. 2003; 89(3): 293–298.
  11. Greenberg B, Quinones MA, Koilpillai C, et al. Effects of long-term enalapril therapy on cardiac structure and function in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Results of the SOLVD echocardiography substudy. Circulation. 1995; 91(10): 2573–2581.
  12. Boccanelli A, Mureddu GF, Cacciatore G, et al. AREA IN-CHF Investigators. Anti-remodelling effect of canrenone in patients with mild chronic heart failure (AREA IN-CHF study): final results. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009; 11(1): 68–76.
  13. Benchimol-Barbosa PR. Cardiac remodeling and predictors for cardiac death in long-term follow-up of subjects with chronic Chagas' heart disease: a mathematical model for progression of myocardial damage. Int J Cardiol. 2009; 131(3): 435–438.
  14. Dávila DF, Rossell O, de Bellabarba GA. Pathogenesis of chronic chagas heart disease: parasite persistence and autoimmune responses versus cardiac remodelling and neurohormonal activation. Int J Parasitol. 2002; 32(1): 107–109.
  15. Bestetti RB. Predictors of unfavourable prognosis in chronic Chagas' disease. Trop Med Int Health. 2001; 6(6): 476–483.
  16. WHO Expert Committee. Control of Chagas disease. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2002; 905(i-vi): 1–109.
  17. Ho KK, Anderson KM, Kannel WB, et al. Survival after the onset of congestive heart failure in Framingham Heart Study subjects. Circulation. 1993; 88(1): 107–115.
  18. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989; 2(5): 358–367.
  19. Aimo A, Gaggin HK, Barison A, et al. Imaging, biomarker, and clinical predictors of cardiac remodeling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2019; 7(9): 782–794.
  20. Cintron G, Johnson G, Francis G, et al. Prognostic significance of serial changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with congestive heart failure. The V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group. Circulation. 1993; 87(6 Suppl): VI17–VI23.
  21. Yusuf S, Pitt B, Davis CE, et al. SOLVD Investigators, SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325(5): 293–302.
  22. Wong M, Staszewsky L, Latini R, et al. Val-HeFT Heart Failure Trial Investigators. Valsartan benefits left ventricular structure and function in heart failure: Val-HeFT echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40(5): 970–975.
  23. Firth B, Dehmer G, Markham R, et al. Assessment of vasodilator therapy in patients with severe congestive heart failure: Limitations of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes. Am J Cardiol. 1982; 50(5): 954–959.
  24. Massie B, Kramer BL, Topic N, et al. Hemodynamic and radionuclide effects of acute captopril therapy for heart failure: changes in left and right ventricular volumes and function at rest and during exercise. Circulation. 1982; 65(7): 1374–1381.
  25. Shah PK, Abdulla A, Pichler M, et al. Effects of nitroprusside-induced reduction of elevated preload and afterload on global and regional ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1983; 105(4): 531–542.
  26. Udelson JE. Ventricular remodeling in heart failure and the effect of beta-blockade. Am J Cardiol. 2004; 93(9A): 43B–8B.
  27. Ramasubbu K, Deswal A, Chan W, et al. Echocardiographic changes during treatment of acute decompensated heart failure: insights from the ESCAPE trial. J Card Fail. 2012; 18(10): 792–798.
  28. Binanay C, Califf RM, Hasselblad V, et al. ESCAPE Investigators and ESCAPE Study Coordinators. Evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness: the ESCAPE trial. JAMA. 2005; 294(13): 1625–1633.
  29. Bocchi EA, Bestetti RB, Scanavacca MI, et al. Chronic Chagas heart disease management: from etiology to cardiomyopathy treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70(12): 1510–1524.
  30. Cohn J, Fowler M, Bristow M, et al. Safety and efficacy of carvedilol in severe heart failure. J Card Fail. 1997; 3(3): 173–179.
  31. Packer M, Colucci WS, Sackner-Bernstein JD, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of carvedilol in patients with moderate to severe heart failure. The PRECISE Trial. Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Carvedilol on Symptoms and Exercise. Circulation. 1996; 94(11): 2793–2799.
  32. Cohn JN, Ferrari R, Sharpe N. Cardiac remodeling--concepts and clinical implications: a consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodeling. Behalf of an International Forum on Cardiac Remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35(3): 569–582.
  33. Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, et al. The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. U.S. Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334(21): 1349–1355.
  34. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999; 353(9146): 9–13.
  35. Batty JA, Hall AS, White HL, et al. MERIT-HF Study Group. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet. 1999; 353(9169): 2001–2007.
  36. Botoni FA, Poole-Wilson PA, Ribeiro ALP, et al. A randomized trial of carvedilol after renin-angiotensin system inhibition in chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 2007; 153(4): 544.e1–544.e8.
  37. Dávila DF, Angel F, Arata de Bellabarba G, et al. Effects of metoprolol in chagasic patients with severe congestive heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2002; 85(2-3): 255–260.
  38. Bestetti RB, Otaviano AP, Cardinalli-Neto A, et al. Effects of B-Blockers on outcome of patients with Chagas' cardiomyopathy with chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2011; 151(2): 205–208.
  39. Issa VS, Amaral AF, Cruz FD, et al. Beta-blocker therapy and mortality of patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy: a subanalysis of the REMADHE prospective trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2010; 3(1): 82–88.
  40. Theodoropoulos TAD, Bestetti RB, Otaviano AP, et al. Predictors of all-cause mortality in chronic Chagas' heart disease in the current era of heart failure therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2008; 128(1): 22–29.
  41. Pimentel Wd, Ramires FJ, Lanni BM, et al. The effect of beta-blockade on myocardial remodelling in Chagas' cardiomyopathy. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012; 67(9): 1063–1069.
  42. Bestetti RB, Sales-Neto VN, Pinto LZ, et al. Effects of long term metoprolol administration on the electrocardiogram of rats infected with T cruzi. Cardiovasc Res. 1990; 24(7): 521–527.
  43. Bestetti RB, Ramos CP, Figuerêdo-Silva J, et al. Ability of the electrocardiogram to detect myocardial lesions in isoproterenol induced rat cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res. 1987; 21(12): 916–921.
  44. Bestetti RB. Role of parasites in the pathogenesis of Chagas' cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 1996; 347(9005): 913–914.
  45. Bestetti R, Cardinalli-Neto A, Otaviano A, et al. Hyponatremia in Chagas disease heart failure: Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognostic importance. Clinical Trials and Regulatory Science in Cardiology. 2015; 11: 6–9.
  46. Bristow M. The adrenergic nervous system in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1984; 311(13): 850–851.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl