open access

Vol 28, No 2 (2021)
Original Article
Submitted: 2019-11-17
Accepted: 2020-02-17
Published online: 2020-03-11
Get Citation

Carotid intima–media thickness (IMT) in patients with severe familial and non-familial hypercholesterolemia: The effect of measurement site on the IMT correlation with traditional cardiovascular risk factors and calcium scores

Rafal Gałąska1, Dorota Kulawiak-Gałąska2, Magdalena Chmara3, Krzysztof Chlebus1, Agnieszka Mickiewicz1, Andrzej Rynkiewicz4, Bartosz Wasąg3, Michał Studniarek2, Marcin Fijałkowski1, Marcin Gruchała1
·
Pubmed: 32207844
·
Cardiol J 2021;28(2):271-278.
Affiliations
  1. 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk
  2. Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk
  3. Department of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Gdansk
  4. Department of Cardiology and Cardiosurgery, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn

open access

Vol 28, No 2 (2021)
Original articles — Clinical cardiology
Submitted: 2019-11-17
Accepted: 2020-02-17
Published online: 2020-03-11

Abstract

Background: The carotid intima–media thickness (IMT) measurement may be carried out proximally (pIMT) or distally (dIMT) in relation to the bulb of the common carotid artery which has significant implications on the results and correlation with risk factors. The aim of the study was to compare the pIMT and dIMT in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia confirmed by genetic testing (FH group) and patients with severe non-familial hypercholesterolemia, with negative results of genetic testing (NFH group) and to determine the correlation of results with traditional atherosclerotic risk factors and calcium scores.

Methods: A total of 86 FH and 50 NFH patients underwent pIMT and dIMT measurements of both carotid arteries as well as computed tomography (CT) with coronary and thoracic aorta calcium scoring.

Results: The meanpIMT of both right and left common carotid artery were significantly higher in patients with FH compared to the NFH group (meanpRIMT 0.721 ± 0.152 vs. 0.644 ± 0.156, p < 0.01, meanpLIMT 0.758 ± 0.173 vs. 0.670 ± 0.110, p < 0.01). Patient age, pre-treatment lowdensity lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels (LDLmax) at baseline and systolic blood pressure were independent predictors of pIMT increases in both carotid arteries. Smoking history, age and LDLmax were independent predictors of dIMT increase. There was a significant correlation between the calcium scores of the ascending aorta, coronary artery and aortic valve and all IMT parameters.

Conclusions: The IMT measured proximally better between patients with familial and non-familial hypercholesterolemia. The association between IMT and traditional cardiovascular risk factors varies between measurement sites. IMT values correlate CT calcium scores in all patients with hypercholesterolaemia regardless of genetic etiology.

Abstract

Background: The carotid intima–media thickness (IMT) measurement may be carried out proximally (pIMT) or distally (dIMT) in relation to the bulb of the common carotid artery which has significant implications on the results and correlation with risk factors. The aim of the study was to compare the pIMT and dIMT in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia confirmed by genetic testing (FH group) and patients with severe non-familial hypercholesterolemia, with negative results of genetic testing (NFH group) and to determine the correlation of results with traditional atherosclerotic risk factors and calcium scores.

Methods: A total of 86 FH and 50 NFH patients underwent pIMT and dIMT measurements of both carotid arteries as well as computed tomography (CT) with coronary and thoracic aorta calcium scoring.

Results: The meanpIMT of both right and left common carotid artery were significantly higher in patients with FH compared to the NFH group (meanpRIMT 0.721 ± 0.152 vs. 0.644 ± 0.156, p < 0.01, meanpLIMT 0.758 ± 0.173 vs. 0.670 ± 0.110, p < 0.01). Patient age, pre-treatment lowdensity lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels (LDLmax) at baseline and systolic blood pressure were independent predictors of pIMT increases in both carotid arteries. Smoking history, age and LDLmax were independent predictors of dIMT increase. There was a significant correlation between the calcium scores of the ascending aorta, coronary artery and aortic valve and all IMT parameters.

Conclusions: The IMT measured proximally better between patients with familial and non-familial hypercholesterolemia. The association between IMT and traditional cardiovascular risk factors varies between measurement sites. IMT values correlate CT calcium scores in all patients with hypercholesterolaemia regardless of genetic etiology.

Get Citation

Keywords

atherosclerosis, familial hypercholesterolemia, intima–media thickness, calcium scores, multidetector computed tomography

About this article
Title

Carotid intima–media thickness (IMT) in patients with severe familial and non-familial hypercholesterolemia: The effect of measurement site on the IMT correlation with traditional cardiovascular risk factors and calcium scores

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 28, No 2 (2021)

Article type

Original Article

Pages

271-278

Published online

2020-03-11

Page views

1307

Article views/downloads

1183

DOI

10.5603/CJ.a2020.0032

Pubmed

32207844

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2021;28(2):271-278.

Keywords

atherosclerosis
familial hypercholesterolemia
intima–media thickness
calcium scores
multidetector computed tomography

Authors

Rafal Gałąska
Dorota Kulawiak-Gałąska
Magdalena Chmara
Krzysztof Chlebus
Agnieszka Mickiewicz
Andrzej Rynkiewicz
Bartosz Wasąg
Michał Studniarek
Marcin Fijałkowski
Marcin Gruchała

References (24)
  1. O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, et al. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340(1): 14–22.
  2. Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, et al. Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987-1993. Am J Epidemiol. 1997; 146(6): 483–494.
  3. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Brotons C, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(29): 2315–2381.
  4. Lorenz MW, Markus HS, Bots ML, et al. Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2007; 115(4): 459–467.
  5. Lavrencic A, Kosmina B, Keber I, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness in young patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Heart. 1996; 76(4): 321–325.
  6. Kusters D, Wiegman A, Kastelein J, et al. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Children With Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Circ Res. 2014; 114(2): 307–310.
  7. Wiegman A, de Groot E, Hutten BA, et al. Arterial intima-media thickness in children heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolaemia. Lancet. 2004; 363(9406): 369–370.
  8. Kornet L, Lambregts J, Hoeks AP, et al. Differences in near-wall shear rate in the carotid artery within subjects are associated with different intima-media thicknesses. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18(12): 1877–1884.
  9. Iglesias del Sol A, Bots ML, Grobbee DE, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness at different sites: relation to incident myocardial infarction; The Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J. 2002; 23(12): 934–940.
  10. Hollander M, Hak AE, Koudstaal PJ, et al. Comparison between measures of atherosclerosis and risk of stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Stroke. 2003; 34(10): 2367–2372.
  11. Iana Simova,. Intima-media thickness: Appropriate evaluation and proper measurement, described. E-journal of the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice 2015; Vol. 13, N° 21.
  12. Polak JF, Post WS, Carr JJ, et al. Associations of common carotid intima-media thickness with coronary heart disease risk factors and events vary with distance from the carotid bulb. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014; 27(9): 991–997.
  13. Galaska R, Kulawiak-Galaska D, Wegrzyn A, et al. Assessment of Subclinical Atherosclerosis Using Computed Tomography Calcium Scores in Patients with Familial and Nonfamilial Hypercholesterolemia. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2016; 23(5): 588–595.
  14. Gałąska R, Kulawiak-Gałąska D, Chmara M, et al. Aortic valve calcium score in hypercholesterolemic patients with and without low-density lipoprotein receptor gene mutation. PLoS One. 2018; 13(12): e0209229.
  15. Stein JH, Korcarz CE, Hurst RT, et al. Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force. Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008; 21(2): 93–111; quiz 189.
  16. Willekes C, Brands PJ, Willigers JM, et al. Assessment of local differences in intima-media thickness in the human common carotid artery. J Vasc Res. 1999; 36(3): 222–228.
  17. Kornet L, Lambregts J, Hoeks AP, et al. Differences in near-wall shear rate in the carotid artery within subjects are associated with different intima-media thicknesses. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18(12): 1877–1884.
  18. Nerem RM. Vascular fluid mechanics, the arterial wall, and atherosclerosis. J Biomech Eng. 1992; 114(3): 274–282.
  19. Sun Yu, Lin CH, Lu CJ, et al. Carotid atherosclerosis, intima media thickness and risk factors: an analysis of 1781 asymptomatic subjects in Taiwan. Atherosclerosis. 2002; 164(1): 89–94.
  20. Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Roth M, et al. Correlations between vascular calcification and atherosclerosis: a comparative electron beam CT study of the coronary and carotid arteries. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998; 22(2): 207–211.
  21. Davis PH, Dawson JD, Mahoney LT, et al. Increased carotid intimal-medial thickness and coronary calcification are related in young and middle-aged adults. The Muscatine study. Circulation. 1999; 100(8): 838–842.
  22. Cohen GI, Aboufakher R, Bess R, et al. Relationship between carotid disease on ultrasound and coronary disease on CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 6(11): 1160–1167.
  23. Kathiresan S, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, et al. Assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, electron beam computed tomography, and carotid ultrasonography of the distribution of subclinical atherosclerosis across Framingham risk strata. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99(3): 310–314.
  24. Wolski C, Rotkiewicz A, Grzelak P, et al. Comparison of tomographic coronary artery calcification index (calcium score) and ultrasonographic measurement of intima-media complex thickness in diabetic subjects. Pol J Radiol. 2011; 76(4): 15–20.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl