open access

Vol 20, No 4 (2013)
Original articles
Published online: 2013-07-26
Get Citation

Direct comparison of steroid and non-steroid eluting small surface pacing leads: Randomized, multicenter clinical trial

Valentina Kutyifa, Endre Zima, Levente Molnar, Christian Kuehne, Soehnke Theiss, Gundula Herrmann, Laszlo Geller, Bela Merkely
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.2013.0103
·
Cardiol J 2013;20(4):431-438.

open access

Vol 20, No 4 (2013)
Original articles
Published online: 2013-07-26

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effi cacy and safety of small surface
steroid-eluting atrial and ventricular pacing leads in comparison to non-steroid leads using
remote monitoring system (Biotronik Home Monitoring®).

Methods: In this randomized multicenter prospective trial, SIELLO T steroid-eluting ventricular
leads (n = 42) were compared to BPPU T non-steroid leads (n = 46) and SIELLO
JT steroid-eluting atrial leads (n = 24) to BPPU JT non-steroid leads (n = 27) (Biotronik,
Berlin, Germany) in pacemaker devices with remote monitoring capabilities. Lead parameters
were evaluated during implantation, at 1-week and 1, 3, 6-month outpatient follow-up. Remote
monitoring data were collected weekly.

Results: Atrial and ventricular steroid-eluting leads had stable sensing and impedance as
compared to non-steroid leads at implantation and during follow-up. Patients with non-steroid
atrial leads had signifi cantly higher threshold compared to steroid leads at 1-week and at
1, 3, 6-month follow-up with a peak at 1-month (1-month 1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 0.7 ± 0.3 V at 0.4 ms,
p < 0.001; 6-month 0.3 ± 0.5 vs. 0.2 ± 0.3 V at 0.4 ms, p = 0.002). Patients with non-steroid
ventricular leads had signifi cantly higher threshold compared to steroid leads at 1, 3, 6-month
(6-month 1.0 ± 0.3 vs. 0.6 ± 0.2 V at 0.4 ms, p < 0.001). Remote monitoring confi rmed consistent
results. During the study, 3 patients died of non-lead-related death. Lead repositioning
was necessary in 2 atrial, 2 ventricular steroid leads and in 1 ventricular non-steroid lead.

Conclusions: Atrial and ventricular pacemaker leads with steroid showed signifi cantly lower
pacing threshold compared to non-steroid leads, confi rmed by remote monitoring.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effi cacy and safety of small surface
steroid-eluting atrial and ventricular pacing leads in comparison to non-steroid leads using
remote monitoring system (Biotronik Home Monitoring®).

Methods: In this randomized multicenter prospective trial, SIELLO T steroid-eluting ventricular
leads (n = 42) were compared to BPPU T non-steroid leads (n = 46) and SIELLO
JT steroid-eluting atrial leads (n = 24) to BPPU JT non-steroid leads (n = 27) (Biotronik,
Berlin, Germany) in pacemaker devices with remote monitoring capabilities. Lead parameters
were evaluated during implantation, at 1-week and 1, 3, 6-month outpatient follow-up. Remote
monitoring data were collected weekly.

Results: Atrial and ventricular steroid-eluting leads had stable sensing and impedance as
compared to non-steroid leads at implantation and during follow-up. Patients with non-steroid
atrial leads had signifi cantly higher threshold compared to steroid leads at 1-week and at
1, 3, 6-month follow-up with a peak at 1-month (1-month 1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 0.7 ± 0.3 V at 0.4 ms,
p < 0.001; 6-month 0.3 ± 0.5 vs. 0.2 ± 0.3 V at 0.4 ms, p = 0.002). Patients with non-steroid
ventricular leads had signifi cantly higher threshold compared to steroid leads at 1, 3, 6-month
(6-month 1.0 ± 0.3 vs. 0.6 ± 0.2 V at 0.4 ms, p < 0.001). Remote monitoring confi rmed consistent
results. During the study, 3 patients died of non-lead-related death. Lead repositioning
was necessary in 2 atrial, 2 ventricular steroid leads and in 1 ventricular non-steroid lead.

Conclusions: Atrial and ventricular pacemaker leads with steroid showed signifi cantly lower
pacing threshold compared to non-steroid leads, confi rmed by remote monitoring.
Get Citation

Keywords

steroid-eluting pacing leads, atrial pacing lead, ventricular pacing lead, remote monitoring, steroid

About this article
Title

Direct comparison of steroid and non-steroid eluting small surface pacing leads: Randomized, multicenter clinical trial

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 20, No 4 (2013)

Pages

431-438

Published online

2013-07-26

DOI

10.5603/CJ.2013.0103

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2013;20(4):431-438.

Keywords

steroid-eluting pacing leads
atrial pacing lead
ventricular pacing lead
remote monitoring
steroid

Authors

Valentina Kutyifa
Endre Zima
Levente Molnar
Christian Kuehne
Soehnke Theiss
Gundula Herrmann
Laszlo Geller
Bela Merkely

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl