open access

Vol 20, No 3 (2013)
Original articles
Published online: 2013-06-01
Get Citation

Predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation with cryoballoon

Banu Evranos, Kudret Aytemir, Ali Oto, Sercan Okutucu, Uğur Karakulak, Levent Şahiner, Barış Kaya, Giray Kabakçı
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.2013.0075
·
Cardiol J 2013;20(3):294-303.

open access

Vol 20, No 3 (2013)
Original articles
Published online: 2013-06-01

Abstract

Background: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is recommended for patients with symptomaticparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) despite anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs). Radiofrequency ablation is widely accepted as an effective treatment for PAF. Cryoenergy by cryoballoon technique is an alternative to radiofrequency (RF) ablation. Cryoballoon ablation is safe, andhas a similar success rate in comparison to RF ablation. AF recurrence with cryoballoon ablationis roughly 30%. The aim of this study is to determine the predictors of AF recurrenceafter cryoballoon ablation.

Methods and Results: Sixty one patients with symptomatic PAF despite AADs withoutstructural heart disease were included. Cryoballoon ablation was performed in 60 patients (36 males, mean age: 54.6 ± 10.7, mean left atrium size: 3.74 ± 0.39 mm). Transthoracic echocardiography including tissue Doppler imaging was performed in all subjects during sinusrhythm at baseline and after the ablation. Intra-atrial and inter-atrial electromechanical delays,and PA-lateral were measured. All patients were scheduled for 24 h Holter recording at baselineand at 3, 6, 9 months follow-up. Venous samples were collected to measure CK-MB, Troponin-T (TnT), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at baseline and 24 h after ablation. Median follow up was 10 (8–12) months. Forty eight (80%) patients were insinus rhythm during the follow up. In receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis, intraleft atrial electromechanical delay and PA-lateral achieve an area under the curve (AUC) 0.97 (p < 0.001) and 0.69 (p < 0.001) for the ability to predict AF recurrence. A cut-off value for baseline intra left atrial electromechanical delay of 29.5 ms predicted AF recurrence with sensitivity of 85% andspecifity of 98%. A cut-off value for PA-lateral of 125 ms predicted AF recurrence with sensitivity of 80% and specifity of 90%. In ROC analysis, age achieves an AUC 0.822 (p = 0.006) for theability to predict AF recurrence. A cut-off value for age of 64 predicted AF recurrence with sensitivity of 71% and specifity of 90%. Early recurrence of AF (HR = 60, 95% CI 18.61–417.86, p < 0.001) predicted also late recurrence of AF.

Conclusions: The increase in AF recurrence by increased intraleft atrial electromechanical delay, PA-lateral and older age show the importance of substrate in AF mechanism. Early recurrence was the strongest predictor of late recurrence of AF; therefore, existence of blankingperiod for cryoballoon ablation should be questioned.

Abstract

Background: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is recommended for patients with symptomaticparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) despite anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs). Radiofrequency ablation is widely accepted as an effective treatment for PAF. Cryoenergy by cryoballoon technique is an alternative to radiofrequency (RF) ablation. Cryoballoon ablation is safe, andhas a similar success rate in comparison to RF ablation. AF recurrence with cryoballoon ablationis roughly 30%. The aim of this study is to determine the predictors of AF recurrenceafter cryoballoon ablation.

Methods and Results: Sixty one patients with symptomatic PAF despite AADs withoutstructural heart disease were included. Cryoballoon ablation was performed in 60 patients (36 males, mean age: 54.6 ± 10.7, mean left atrium size: 3.74 ± 0.39 mm). Transthoracic echocardiography including tissue Doppler imaging was performed in all subjects during sinusrhythm at baseline and after the ablation. Intra-atrial and inter-atrial electromechanical delays,and PA-lateral were measured. All patients were scheduled for 24 h Holter recording at baselineand at 3, 6, 9 months follow-up. Venous samples were collected to measure CK-MB, Troponin-T (TnT), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at baseline and 24 h after ablation. Median follow up was 10 (8–12) months. Forty eight (80%) patients were insinus rhythm during the follow up. In receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis, intraleft atrial electromechanical delay and PA-lateral achieve an area under the curve (AUC) 0.97 (p < 0.001) and 0.69 (p < 0.001) for the ability to predict AF recurrence. A cut-off value for baseline intra left atrial electromechanical delay of 29.5 ms predicted AF recurrence with sensitivity of 85% andspecifity of 98%. A cut-off value for PA-lateral of 125 ms predicted AF recurrence with sensitivity of 80% and specifity of 90%. In ROC analysis, age achieves an AUC 0.822 (p = 0.006) for theability to predict AF recurrence. A cut-off value for age of 64 predicted AF recurrence with sensitivity of 71% and specifity of 90%. Early recurrence of AF (HR = 60, 95% CI 18.61–417.86, p < 0.001) predicted also late recurrence of AF.

Conclusions: The increase in AF recurrence by increased intraleft atrial electromechanical delay, PA-lateral and older age show the importance of substrate in AF mechanism. Early recurrence was the strongest predictor of late recurrence of AF; therefore, existence of blankingperiod for cryoballoon ablation should be questioned.

Get Citation

Keywords

cryoballoon ablation, intraleft AEMD, early atrial fibrillation recurrence

About this article
Title

Predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation with cryoballoon

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 20, No 3 (2013)

Pages

294-303

Published online

2013-06-01

DOI

10.5603/CJ.2013.0075

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2013;20(3):294-303.

Keywords

cryoballoon ablation
intraleft AEMD
early atrial fibrillation recurrence

Authors

Banu Evranos
Kudret Aytemir
Ali Oto
Sercan Okutucu
Uğur Karakulak
Levent Şahiner
Barış Kaya
Giray Kabakçı

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl