Tom 9, Nr 3 (2024)
Wytyczne / stanowisko ekspertów
Opublikowany online: 2024-06-19

dostęp otwarty

Wyświetlenia strony 72
Wyświetlenia/pobrania artykułu 53
Pobierz cytowanie

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Wytyczne i rekomendacje / Guidelines and recommendations
Zdrowie publiczne / Public health

Biuletyn Polskiego
Towarzystwa Onkologicznego
NOWOTWORY

2024, tom 9, nr 3, 227–236

© Polskie Towarzystwo Onkologiczne

ISSN: 2543–5248, e-ISSN: 2543–8077

www.nowotwory.edu.pl

Infectious disease prophylaxis and treatment in cancer patients, with particular emphasis on COVID-19. Interdisciplinary position statement of Polish experts

Piotr Rutkowski 1Bożena Cybulska-Stopa23Jacek Jassem4Adam Płużański1Krzysztof Tomasiewicz5Lucjan Wyrwicz1Piotr Wysocki6Jacek Wysocki7Robert Flisiak8
1Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
2Lower Silesian Oncology Center, Pulmonology and Hematology, Wroclaw, Poland
3Department of Hematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland
4Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
5Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
6Jagiellonian University, Collegium Medicum Hospital, Krakow, Poland
7Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
8Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
Infectious diseases constitute a significant burden for cancer patients. This became particularly evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to cancer itself and its treatment, the course of infectious diseases in oncology patients is often unpredictable and may negatively affect them. Preventing infectious diseases through a wide range of vaccinations may help maintain the continuity of treatment and constitute an element of holistic patient care. Testing patients with symptoms or suspected infections allows proper treatment and may avoid unfavorable consequences. More education on preventing and treating infectious diseases is necessary to improve the standard of cancer care.
Key words: infectious diseases, cancer, vaccines, COVID-19

Jak cytować / How to cite:

Rutkowski P, Cybulska-Stopa B, Jassem J, Płużański A, Tomasiewicz K, Wyrwicz L, Wysocki P, Wysocki J, Flisiak R. Infectious disease prophylaxis and treatment in cancer patients, with particular emphasis on COVID-19. Interdisciplinary position statement of Polish experts. NOWOTWORY J Oncol 2024; 74: 203–212.

Introduction

Cancer patients present an increased risk of severe infections. However, their awareness of the need for preventive measures is low. In the United States of America, the number of cancer-related deaths among cancer patients increased slightly between 2018 and 2021 [1]. In parallel, a significant increase in other death causes was observed, mainly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of deaths in cancer patients caused by non-cancer causes was highest in the winter months of 2021 and 2022, corresponding to subsequent waves of COVID-19 [1]. In Poland, a significant increase in the mortality of cancer patients was also observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, although some deaths may be attributed to delayed diagnosis and poorer access to health care. The highest 30-day mortality was noted in patients with lung cancer. Mortality rates due to vaccine-
-preventable infections (including influenza,
COVID-19 and pneumococcal diseases) in cancer patients are higher than 10%, reaching up to 50% in cases of invasive pneumococcal disease [2–4].

Taking into account Polish cancer patients’ insufficient awareness of the burden of infectious diseases, their prevention, testing and treatment, we present herewith the interdisciplinary expert position statement on these aspects from the perspective of infectious diseases, vaccinology and oncology. Considering the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients, this article focuses mainly on this infectious disease. We aim to facilitate actions to implement the prevention of infectious diseases in cancer patients, focusing on COVID-19 [1].

Infectious diseases burden in cancer patients, focusing on COVID-19

Infectious diseases have a significant impact on cancer patients. Vaccinations can effectively protect against the consequences of infectious diseases, allow the continuity of anticancer therapy, and a decrease in mortality [1, 5]. This impact is apparent for COVID-19, where subsequent infection waves were accompanied by peaks of excess deaths [1]. Indeed, people with a history or current cancer are at high risk of severe disease and death from this infection [6–8]. In the case of seasonal influenza, hospitalized cancer patients were shown to have higher mortality, longer hospital stays and a greater risk of health-related complications, including pneumonia, neutropenia and sepsis [9]. Importantly, viral infections pave the way for bacterial infections. Therefore, Streptococcus pneumoniae infections are secondary infections or co-infections, which in immunosuppressed cancer patients may be particularly harmful [10–12].

Typically, hematologic malignancies carry an increased risk of severe infections compared to solid tumors, as shown for COVID-19 [13, 14]. At the same time, however, solid malignancies are more common than hematologic malignancies [15]. Importantly, cancer patients are not a homogeneous group. The main risk factors for severe COVID-19 in cancer patients are:

  • multiple comorbidities [6, 16–18],
  • type of cancer (including acute leukemia, lung cancer, genital cancer, thyroid cancer) [6, 17, 19, 20],
  • cytotoxic treatment (including time elapsed since therapy) [18],
  • bone marrow transplants,
  • advanced age [6, 16–18],
  • male gender [6, 16, 17, 19],
  • ethnicity [6, 16, 17, 19],
  • multi-neoplastic syndromes [17],
  • smoking [16],
  • average or poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [16],
  • history of active cancer versus cancer in remission [16].

Due to impaired immune system and treatment-related immunosuppression, cancer patients are more susceptible to unpredictable courses of infections and post-infectious complications [21]. Numerous factors related to cancer influence the course of infectious diseases:

  • corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive drugs reduce the immune response,
  • cytotoxic drugs may cause bone marrow suppression, which may lead to thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, thus prompting bacterial infections [22],
  • radiotherapy-related lymphopenia increases the risk of severe viral infections [22],
  • inhibiting the activity of immune checkpoints may result in excessive cytokine production and may contribute to the development of a cytokine storm.

Multiple factors increase the risk of severe COVID-19 infections in cancer patients. These include impaired immune system function, synergistic inflammatory reaction, chronic inflammation, increased expression of the ACE2 receptor (in some cancer types) and TMPRSS2 (prostate cancer), and increased procoagulant activity. The SARS-CoV-2 virus is evolving, which changes the burden of COVID-19. During the dominance of the BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants (early Omicron phase), the mortality among hospitalized patients was 1214%. During the dominance of BA.5, BA.2.75, BQ.1 and XBB.1.5 subvariants (late Omicron phase), the overall burden of COVID-19 was lower in the general population but persisted in hospitalized patients at the alarming level of 9% [23]. The number of deaths among cancer patients was the highest during the COVID-19 wave in early 2022 and was disproportionately higher than that in the general population [24]. Unvaccinated individuals are much more susceptible to COVID-19 sequelae; therefore, vaccination appears to be the most effective prevention of severe COVID-19 infection [25].

Complications of infectious diseases in cancer patients

Recently, much attention has been paid to complications following infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus called long-COVID syndrome [26, 27]. It is estimated that this syndrome may affect as many as of patients [27]. It manifests as persistent impaired functioning of the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, fatigue and cognitive disorder [28], which may last several weeks or months after the infection [29]. An analysis of the OnCovid registry showed that complications persisted after COVID-19 for 6 and 12 months in 9.8% and 8.0% of patients, respectively. Factors associated with a higher complication risk included male gender, age ≥65 years, ≥2 comorbidities, history of smoking and a severe course of COVID-19 [29].

The time of virus elimination (identified as a positive PCR test) is longer in cancer patients than in patients with an effective immune system [30–33]. Such situations may affect the continuity of anticancer treatment. Indeed, the data from the OnCovid registry showed that anticancer treatment was modified or discontinued in 14.6% and 22.9% of patients, respectively, and treatment termination due to COVID-19 complications was associated with a significantly reduced survival compared to that among patients who continued treatment (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3719.9) [34]. Current recommendations advise treatment continuation in the case of asymptomatic chronic viremia.

The vaccination benefits for cancer patients include preventing severe disease, hospitalization and death. Still, vaccinations may also shorten possible infection duration, limit potential therapeutic breaks, or avoid deferring the antitumor treatment. Interruption of the ongoing treatment due to any infection is a significant problem that intensifies during seasonal infection peaks, mainly considering COVID-19 and influenza. The general public underestimates infections as a medical problem, and this also applies to cancer patients. Often, patients who require anticancer treatment, including surgery, show up with an active infection and rarely use vaccination. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant increase in the number of excess cancer deaths resulting from delayed cancer diagnosis [35]. The spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus affected cancer screening, health problems reporting, diagnosis, access to treatment and clinical research. Consequently, preventive vaccinations are gaining new importance as a basis for maintaining the continuity of the diagnostics and therapy of cancer patients [36].

Vaccinations in cancer patients

Cancer itself and immunosuppressive anticancer treatment hinder the protective effects of some vaccinations by reducing seroconversion and accelerating the waning of immunity over time [37, 38]. For these reasons, cancer patient vaccination schedules may differ from those used in the general population (e.g., the number of doses and revaccination frequency), therefore the vaccination history should be in particular documented (e.g. centralized electronic vaccination system) [39]. Unfortunately, knowledge of this topic is scarce. Of note, the example of vaccination against COVID-19 shows that despite a significantly weakened humoral response, the cellular response often remains satisfactory [37].

A comprehensive approach to vaccinations for cancer patients is often presented in a graphic form as the so-called vaccination calendar. Developing such calendars for the general cancer population is difficult due to limited knowledge. However, vaccination schedules exist for some risk groups, including patients with hematologic malignancies or asplenia [40]and rheumatic diseases [41]. Table I shows the recommended seasonal and year-round vaccinations for cancer patients [21].

Table I. Recommended seasonal and year-round vaccinations for cancer patients [21]

Vaccination type

Infectious disease

Optimal vaccination time

Practical remarks

seasonal

COVID-19

vaccination against COVID-19 should be performed in line with the latest national or international recommendations for a given season once the adapted vaccine becomes available. However, the vaccination should not be delayed, awaiting the availability of the adapted vaccine [70]. Revaccination should take place every 6–12 months in consultation with a health care provider, and at least 3 months after COVID-19 recovery [71]

for detailed vaccination schedules, refer to current vaccination calendars recommended by the Polish Vaccinology Society [72] for brand names of specific vaccines, see table II.

The non-seasonal infections may overlap with seasonal infections during the autumnal-winter period, presenting more severe clinical outcomes, such as influenza and pneumococcal disease [73].

Vaccination against seasonal and non-seasonal infections may be administered during a single visit or at separate visits, provided they contain non-live antigens [74]. Considering seasonal infections, it is important to protect patients before the fall-winter period. It is also worth getting vaccinated during the season. For best protection time see the “Optimal vaccination time” column [75]

influenza

in Poland, the influenza epidemic season lasts from October to May and peaks from January to March [76]. Considering it takes about 2 weeks to develop protective antibodies, the best time to get vaccinated is in September. However, if this optimal vaccination period is missed, vaccination is indicated till the circulation of given viral strains [77]

RSV

RSV vaccine is currently a single-dose vaccine with no need for revaccination. This vaccination should be provided before RSV infections peak, which typically starts
in October, meaning in late summer or early fall [78–80]

non-seasonal

pneumococcal disease, meningococcal disease, HBV, HiB, HPV, VZV, Tdap

no specific vaccination time throughout the year is indicated. Therefore, a year-round vaccination is possible; however, the faster vaccination is administered, the better for patient protection

In Poland, detailed data on vaccination rates in particular risk groups are lacking; thus, assessing cancer patients’ vaccination willingness is difficult. Available data indicate that overall influenza vaccination coverage in Poland is low (around 5% each year in the general population and around 20% among people aged ≥65 years) [42]. The primary COVID-19 vaccination rate is about 60%, and the first and second booster doses were taken by 30% and 7.7% of Poles, respectively. According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) data, the COVID-19 vaccination rate is about 20% lower than in the general population, which may also apply to other vaccinations [43, 44].

The implementation of vaccination depends on the patient’s attitude and individual understanding of the importance of the recommendation. Therefore, there is an apparent need for educational activities to address both patients and their immediate environment [36]. One such element is the vaccination advice based on current recommendations given by an oncologist. Issuing a vaccine prescription against, e.g., pneumococci, RSV, or shingles may motivate the patient. The patient should be informed that several preventive vaccinations, except those using live microorganisms, can be administered during one visit. Within the scope of permissions, primary care physicians and pharmacists may implement oncologists’ recommendations. Additionally, an important issue is the implementation of the cocoon strategy, which includes, among others, vaccination of household members, close relatives and healthcare workers [36, 45].

Vaccination recommendations for adult patients with hematological malignancies are available in Polish, implemented into clinical practice and updated [40]. However, there are no similar national recommendations for patients with solid tumors. In 2018, joint recommendations for preventing infectious diseases were developed by ASCO and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) [46]. That said, they do not respond to all current medical needs. In turn, the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines cover the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases in a more up-to-date and comprehensive way, taking into account influenza, COVID-19, pneumococcal and meningococcal infections, HPV, RSV, VZV, Tdap and other infections (47). Table II summarizes these recommendations, pointing out the vaccines available in Poland, their standard dosages and reimbursement status.

Table II. Indications, vaccines, dosage regimens and patient payment levels of vaccines available in Poland (46, 80–87)

Vaccination

Indication

Trade name*

Dosage schedule

Reimbursement charge

Vaccination

Indication

Trade name*

Dosage schedule

Reimbursement charge

influenza

vaccination once a year before the infectious season with an inactivated vaccine

Influvac Tetra1

Vaxigrip Tetra

1 dose during the infectious season

18–64 years – 50% payment (refund)1
65+ – free of charge

COVID-19

all cancer patients or those previously treated for cancer should be vaccinated against COVID-19

Comirnaty – mRNA vaccine

Nuvaxovid – protein vaccine

Spikevax – mRNA vaccine

1 dose during the infectious season**

free of charge (National COVID-19 Vaccination Program)

pneumococcal diseases

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine should be administered to adult cancer patients who have not been vaccinated against pneumococci

Prevenar 20

Prevenar 13 (PCV13) 13-valent conjugate vaccine

Pneumovax 23 (PPV23) 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine

PCV13 + PPV23** after min. 8 weeks or PVC20;

people who previously received PPV23 should receive PCV13 or PCV20 after >1 year

Prevenar 13 is free of charge for people 65+ with increased risk of pneumococcal disease development. The Protective Vaccination Program for 2024 provides free pneumococcal vaccinations for all people before or after immunosuppressive or biological treatment. Currently, there is no information about which vaccine will be reimbursed under the National Immunization Program (NIP)

meningococcal diseases

patients at increased risk of meningococcal infection: with functional or anatomical asplenia, complement deficiencies, taking a C5 complement inhibitor (e.g., eculizumab, ravulizumab) should receive a quadrivalent vaccine against meningococci of serogroup ACWY and a monovalent vaccine against meningococci of serogroup B

NeisVac-C – conjugate vaccine against serogroup C

Nimenrix – conjugate vaccine against the ACWY serogroup

Bexsero – protein vaccine against serogroup B

Trumenba – recombinant vaccine against serogroup B

1 dose

1 dose

2 doses at an interval of not less than 1 month

2 doses 6 months apart

fully paid

human papillomavirus (HPV)

the recombinant 3-dose HPV vaccine should be administered to men and women <26 years and may be considered for patients <45 years

Cervarix – bivalent vaccine

Gardasil 9 – 9-valent vaccine

3 doses administered at 0, 2 and 6 months

Cervarix vaccine – 50% payment – refund; the universal free-of-charge HPV vaccination program using the Cervarix and Gardasil 9 vaccines is aimed at girls and boys aged 12 and 13; Cervarix is free-of-charge for people under 18 years of age (list 18–).

shingles (VZV)

administration of recombinant herpes zoster vaccine (VZV) is recommended for adult patients ≥50 years and for persons ≥18 years at risk for herpes zoster

Shingrix

2 doses 2–6 months apart in immunocompromised individuals who would benefit from achieving optimal immunization in a shorter period; alternatively, an abbreviated regimen of 2 doses administered
≥1 month apart

Shingrix is 50% reimbursed in people >65 years and elderly people from risk groups, including generalized malignancy

respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)

passive protection against lower respiratory tract diseases caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants from birth to 6 months of age after maternal vaccination during pregnancy

active immunization of people >60 years against lower respiratory tract diseases caused by RSV. The effectiveness of the vaccine in cancer patients is unknown

Abrysvo – bivalent vaccine

Arexvy – monovalent vaccine

1 dose

1 dose

fully paid

fully paid

diphtheria/tetanus/whooping cough (Tdap)

administered every 10 years

Adacel Boostrix

1 dose

The National Immunization Program for 2024 provides free-of-charge Tdap vaccinations for all people who are before or after transplantation of hematopoietic cells, internal organs, splenectomy, with asplenia, or splenic dysfunctions

Diagnosis of cancer is a rough emotional experience and may distract patients from the implementation of prophylactic measures, including vaccinations [48, 49]. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic hampered cancer treatment and appropriate prevention implementation [50]. The patient should be clearly informed that infection may affect anticancer treatment. The vaccination should ideally be performed at cancer diagnosis and before anticancer treatment, as this may lower vaccine effectiveness. Inactivated vaccines should be administered at least two weeks (vaccines containing live microorganisms at least four weeks) before starting treatment. Due to the risk of infection induction, vaccinations containing live microorganisms are contraindicated during chemotherapy and in immunocompromised patients [51]. In turn, vaccinations without live microorganisms can be safely used in these populations [21]. If vaccination is substantiated after anticancer therapy, the optimal time is from three to 12 months after its completion, depending on the vaccine and oncological treatment [51].

The vaccinations indicated in table II are safe for cancer patients. The contraindications to vaccination are limited and include, among others:

  • active infection,
  • active cancer during intensive chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (however, there are no clear contraindications to the administration of influenza and COVID-19 vaccines),
  • intensive immunosuppression, i.e., corticosteroid therapy (calculated for prednisone >0.5 mg/kg/day for over 14 days), rituximab, or other anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies,
  • allergic reactions to a given vaccine [51].

Notably, influenza vaccinations were shown to prolong overall survival (OS) in cancer patients administered immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) [52]. Given influenza’s relatively low mortality, vaccination against more deadly infections (e.g., COVID-19) may carry even greater OS benefit [53].

Vaccination access for cancer patients in Poland

Cancer patients should be among the vaccination priority groups due to their high risk of severe infections and complications [21, 36, 47]. Access to vaccinations in Poland has been recently significantly improved (tab. II), due the extension of reimbursement of pneumococcal and influenza vaccines and local vaccination prevention programs [54, 55].

An essential step in improving the protection of cancer patients by vaccination should be the development of national practice guidelines addressed to medical oncologists, surgeons and radiation oncologists. Currently, the reimbursement system for medicinal products is dispersed between pharmacies and primary care facilities, and in the case of vaccinations, it does not cover specialist treatment. Hence, although oncologists know the importance of vaccinations, they are not implemented in clinical practice. To facilitate this process, vaccination points should be located in cancer centers. A good example is the Świętokrzyskie Oncology Center, where vaccinations against pneumococci are carried out in patients with most common solid and hematological malignancies [56]. It is postulated that all vaccines necessary for comprehensive primary prevention should be available in hospitals and administered within the facility. All of the above ventures should increase vaccination rates in a population that is particularly sensitive to the severe course of infections, and these actions may also include other groups of patients.

The National Oncology Strategy provides an opportunity to popularize vaccination prevention [57]. So far, the popularization of vaccinations in Poland has been limited, illustrated by low HPV vaccination rates [58]. Therefore, broad educational activities in the field of vaccinations in Poland are still needed.

Testing and treatment of COVID-19 in cancer patients

Despite preventive measures, infectious diseases in cancer patients remain a significant challenge. The American Covid Data Tracker data for 20182021 clearly shows increased mortality due to cancer as an underlying cause and a significant increase in the number of deaths due to infectious diseases, particularly COVID-19 [1].

Despite the accessibility of combo antigen tests (including COVID-19, RSV, influenza A and B) as part of primary health care services in Poland, they are not performed sufficiently frequently. This situation hinders causal treatment implementation, e.g., influenza (oseltamivir) and COVID-19 [59, 60]. Subsequently, the number of these infections and the overall data for the Polish population are blurred. Considering these facts, the WHO focuses on testing all symptomatic and high-risk asymptomatic patients [61]. According to the current IDSA diagnostic algorithm, testing for COVID-19 should only be performed in symptomatic patients [62]. It is recommended to use antigen tests with a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of at least 90% and 97%, respectively. If symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 persist and the first test is negative, it should be repeated after 34 days, when the highest concentration of antigens is recorded [63].

According to the recently updated WHO COVID-19 treatment guidelines, depending on the clinical condition of cancer patients, the risk of severe COVID-19 may be classified as high or moderate, corresponding to a hospitalization risk of 6% and 3%, respectively [64]. The current guidelines are similar to those in the general population [64]. These recommendations are in line with those of the Polish Society of Epidemiologists and Infectious Disease Physicians from 2022 because inhaled budesonide and the use of monoclonal antibodies against the S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus are principally no longer relevant for clinical practice [64, 65].

According to Polish guidelines, antiviral treatment can be used in the first and second COVID-19 stages, i.e., in the mild and full-symptomatic phases, before the development of respiratory failure [65]. According to the latest WHO recommendations, the only strongly recommended therapy in the early phase of COVID-19 in patients at high risk of hospitalization is a short-term oral course of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NIR/RIT). The use of NIR/RIT may be considered in patients with a moderate risk of hospitalization [61]. In contrast, the indications for molnupiravir and remdesivir in patients at high risk of hospitalization are weak or conditional.

According to NCCN guidelines for cancer-related infections, NIR/RIT or remdesivir may be used in patients with acute illness, recent onset of symptoms and high risk of COVID-19 progression (prolonged neutropenia, lymphopenia, or T-cell dysfunction accompanying hematologic malignancies and lung cancer). During hospitalization, treatment with remdesivir is recommended. NIR/RIT and/or remdesivir may be used in patients with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection, typically in patients with B-cell hematologic malignancies [47].

The authorization of molnupiravir in the European Union was withdrawn in June 2023 [66]. So far, remdesivir and NIR/RIT are not reimbursed in Poland, although the reimbursement process for NIR/RIT is ongoing [67]. Given the burden of COVID-19 and the high mortality of cancer patients, access to effective treatment of this infection in Poland remains an unmet medical need [61].

NIR/RIT may interact with anticancer drugs; it is therefore recommended that potential interactions be checked using a simple online tool on the University of Liverpool website [68]. Since NIR/RIT therapy is short-term (up to 5 days from COVID-19 symptoms’ onset), in most cases, drug interactions can be prevented by modifying treatment doses or changing some active substances [64]. Of great importance is that drug-drug interactions for NIR/RIT are based on data obtained from ritonavir studies in HIV, where these compounds were used at a higher dose and in a chronic manner [61, 64]. Ritonavir, being an inhibitor of some cytochrome P450 isoenzymes (mainly CYP3A4, CYP2D6) and having a high affinity for P-glycoprotein (P-gp), may affect the concentration of other concomitantly administered drugs [64]. Hence, when implementing the NIR/RIT, a risk-benefit ratio should always be considered.

Many patients are not aware of the risk of severe COVID-19 and neglect antigen testing after viral exposure or symptoms emergence. Likewise, few at-risk people know that appropriate treatment may reduce their risk of hospitalization and death due to COVID-19. Further, patients must realize that delayed intervention may substantially reduce treatment efficacy. Patients must be educated about the risk of progression to severe COVID-19 and know what to do once they develop symptoms and test positive for COVID-19. The post-vaccination immunity weakens over time, whereas the willingness to receive subsequent booster doses decreases, allowing for SARS-CoV-2 immune escape. It is expected, therefore, that the number of hospitalizations among vaccinated people, especially among high-risk groups, will increase [61]. A cross-sectional study in the US showed that hospitalizations due to breakthrough infection were reported in up to 25% of vaccinated patients during the dominance of the Omicron variant. Therefore, owing to the low rate of booster vaccinations, the proportion of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 is expected to increase [69]. For this reason, providing effective COVID-19 treatment for cancer patients and other high-risk patients remains an important issue.

Conclusions

Infections pose a significant threat to cancer patients. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant disruption in cancer management, worsened treatment outcomes and significantly increased cancer mortality directly and indirectly. Vaccinations remain the cornerstone of preventing the consequences of infections. However, the COVID-19 booster and influenza vaccination rates remain low in Poland.

A vital issue hindering the implementation of recommended vaccinations in cancer patients is a concern of primary care physicians and patients about vaccination safety after cancer diagnosis. Therefore, the development of Polish vaccination recommendations for patients with solid malignancies is an urgent medical need. Cancer patients themselves are often unaware of the risk of severe infections, especially COVID-19, which reduces their willingness to vaccination, testing and implementing casual treatment. A limited number of cancer patients are aware of outpatient COVID-19 treatment options. Therefore, education on this matter is essential. The health care system should shorten the patient clinical path and enable the co-administration of necessary vaccinations during a single visit. The organization and financing of the health care system should also support rapid diagnosis and treatment of infections in cancer patients. Organizational, logistic and reimbursement changes are warranted to improve patients’ safety in all cancer care institutions.

Article information and declarations

Author contributions

Piotr Rutkowski conceptualization, supervision, writing original draft preparation, writing review and editing.

Bożena Cybulska-Stopa conceptualization, writing original draft preparation, writing review and editing.

Jacek Jassem conceptualization, writing original draft preparation, writing review and editing.

Adam Płużański conceptualization, writing original draft preparation, writing review and editing.

Krzysztof Tomasiewicz conceptualization, writing original draft preparation, writing review and editing.

Lucjan Wyrwicz conceptualization, writing original draft preparation, writing review and editing.

Piotr Wysocki conceptualization, writing original draft preparation, writing review and editing.

Jacek Wysocki conceptualization, writing original draft preparation, writing review and editing.

Robert Flisiak conceptualization, writing original draft preparation, writing review and editing.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Karolina Wieruszewska-Kowalczyk and Michał Abendrot for critical manuscript review and editing support. We thank Urszula Sot for her contribution in literature search that helped develop this paper.

Financial support

Pfizer Polska has organized the meeting of the Expert Committee on infectious diseases in cancer patients with particular attention to COVID-19. Medical writing support was provided by Marcin Balcerzak (Medink) and was funded by Pfizer.

Conflicts of Interest

Piotr Rutkowski consulting fees (Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Philogen, Pfizer), honoraria (Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Merck, Astra Zeneca), Speakers’ Bureau (Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, MSD, BMS), support for attending meetings and/or travel (Orphan Europe, Pierre Fabre). Bożena Cybulska-Stopa honoraria for lectures, grants, consultancies and fees (MSD, BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Pfizer). Jacek Jassem consulting or advisory roles (from BMS, Roche, and MSD), travel, accommodation, and expenses (Takeda), speakers bureau support (from Roche not compensated, Pfizer, Novartis, and MSD). Adam Płużański advisory board, travel grant (Pfizer). Krzysztof Tomasiewicz consultancy, advisory board, speaker (AbbVie, Alfasigma, AstraZeneca, Bausch Healthcare, Gilead, GSK, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Promed), grant or research (AbbVie, Gilead, GSK). Lucjan Wyrwicz no conflict to declare in connection with this publication. Piotr Wysocki consulting fees (Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Immunicom, Merck, Astellas, Janssen, Ipsen), honoraria (Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Immunicom, Pfizer, Merck, Astellas, Janssen, Ipsen), support for attending meetings and/or travel (BMS, Astra Zeneca, Pierre Fabre), participation in Data Safety Monitoring or Advisory Boards (Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Immunicom, Pfizer, Merck, Astellas, Janssen, Ipsen). Robert Flisiak grants (AbbVie, Gilead, MSD, Pfizer, Roche), Consultations (AbbVie, Baush, Gilead, MSD, Moderna, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer), honoraria (AbbVie, Baush, Gilead, MSD, Pfizer).

Marcin Balcerzak

Medink

ul. Ogrodowa 11d/1

05-500 Mysiadło, Poland

e-mail: marcin.balcerzak@medink.eu

Received: 11 Apr 2024

Accepted: 19 Apr 2024

References

  1. Henley SJ, Dowling NF, Ahmad FB, et al. COVID-19 and Other Underlying Causes of Cancer Deaths - United States, January 2018-July 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022; 71(50): 15831588, doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7150a3, indexed in Pubmed: 36520660.
  2. Echavarria I, Carrión Galindo JR, Corral J, et al. SEOM clinical guidelines for the prophylaxis of infectious diseases in cancer patients (2021). Clin Transl Oncol. 2022; 24(4): 724732, doi: 10.1007/s12094-022-02800-3, indexed in Pubmed: 35230619.
  3. Fattore GL, Olivos NS, Olalla JE, et al. Mortality in patients with cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection: Results from the Argentinean Network of Hospital-Based Cancer Registries. Cancer Epidemiol. 2022; 79: 102200, doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102200, indexed in Pubmed: 35772301.
  4. Burgos J, Luján M, Larrosa MN, et al. The problem of early mortality in pneumococcal pneumonia: a study of risk factors. Eur Respir J. 2015; 46(2): 561564, doi: 10.1183/09031936.00034415, indexed in Pubmed: 26022957.
  5. Zembower TR. Epidemiology of infections in cancer patients. Cancer Treat Res. 2014; 161: 4389, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04220-6_2, indexed in Pubmed: 24706221.
  6. Chavez-MacGregor M, Lei X, Zhao H, et al. Evaluation of COVID-19 Mortality and Adverse Outcomes in US Patients With or Without Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2022; 8(1): 6978, doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5148, indexed in Pubmed: 34709356.
  7. Anantharaman A, Dusendang JR, Schmittdiel JA, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cancer in a Large Integrated Health Care System in Northern California. Oncologist. 2021; 26(3): e500e504, doi: 10.1002/onco.13602, indexed in Pubmed: 33210439.
  8. Giannakoulis VG, Papoutsi E, Siempos II. Effect of Cancer on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis of Patient Data. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020; 6: 799808, doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00225, indexed in Pubmed: 32511066.
  9. Li J, Zhang D, Sun Z, et al. Influenza in hospitalised patients with malignancy: a propensity score matching analysis. ESMO Open. 2020; 5(5): e000968, doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000968, indexed in Pubmed: 33093022.
  10. Klein EY, Monteforte B, Gupta A, et al. The frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2016; 10(5): 394403, doi: 10.1111/irv.12398, indexed in Pubmed: 27232677.
  11. Gaudin J, Thayalakulasingam T. Invasive Pneumococcal Disease and COVID-19 With Acute Otitis Media and a Tegmen Tympani Defect. Cureus. 2023; 15(9): e44869, doi: 10.7759/cureus.44869, indexed in Pubmed: 37814724.
  12. Sagar AES, Evans SE. Pneumonia in the Cancer Patient. In: Nates J, Price KE. ed. Oncologic Critical Care. Springer, Cham 2020.
  13. Papakonstantinou E, Dragoumani K, Efthimiadou A, et al. Haematological malignancies implications during the times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Oncol Lett. 2021; 22(6): 856, doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.13117, indexed in Pubmed: 34777590.
  14. Langerbeins P, Hallek M. COVID-19 in patients with hematologic malignancy. Blood. 2022; 140(3): 236252, doi: 10.1182/blood.2021012251, indexed in Pubmed: 35544585.
  15. Rolston KVI. Infections in Cancer Patients with Solid Tumors: A Review. Infect Dis Ther. 2017; 6(1): 6983, doi: 10.1007/s40121-017-0146-1, indexed in Pubmed: 28160269.
  16. Kuderer NM, Choueiri TK, Shah DP, et al. COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium. Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer (CCC19): a cohort study. Lancet. 2020; 395(10241): 19071918, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31187-9, indexed in Pubmed: 32473681.
  17. Sharafeldin N, Bates B, Song Q, et al. Outcomes of COVID-19 in Patients With Cancer: Report From the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C). J Clin Oncol. 2021; 39(20): 22322246, doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01074, indexed in Pubmed: 34085538.
  18. Wang Lu, Sun Y, Yuan Ye, et al. Clinical challenges in cancer patients with COVID-19: Aging, immunosuppression, and comorbidities. Aging (Albany NY). 2020; 12(23): 2446224474, doi: 10.18632/aging.104205, indexed in Pubmed: 33232275.
  19. Russell B, Moss CL, Shah V, et al. Guy’s Cancer Real World Evidence. Risk of COVID-19 death in cancer patients: an analysis from Guy’s Cancer Centre and King’s College Hospital in London. Br J Cancer. 2021; 125(7): 939947, doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01500-z, indexed in Pubmed: 34400804.
  20. Venkatesulu B, Chandrasekar V, Girdhar P, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cancer Patients Affected by a Novel Coronavirus. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021; 5(2), doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa102.
  21. Czyżykowski R, Płużański A. Supportive care. Prophylaxis and treatment of infections. Oncol Clin Pract. 2020; 16: 143149, doi: 10.5603/OCP.2020.0010.
  22. Rapoport BL. Management of the cancer patient with infection and neutropenia. Semin Oncol. 2011; 38(3): 424430, doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.03.013, indexed in Pubmed: 21600373.
  23. Flisiak R, Zarębska-Michaluk D, Dobrowolska K, et al. Change in the Clinical Picture of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 between the Early and Late Period of Dominance of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Variant. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(17), doi: 10.3390/jcm12175572, indexed in Pubmed: 37685639.
  24. Potter AL, Vaddaraju V, Venkateswaran S, et al. Deaths Due to COVID-19 in Patients With Cancer During Different Waves of the Pandemic in the US. JAMA Oncol. 2023; 9(10): 14171422, doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3066, indexed in Pubmed: 37651113.
  25. Cortellini A, Tabernero J, Mukherjee U, et al. OnCovid study group. SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529)-related COVID-19 sequelae in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients with cancer: results from the OnCovid registry. Lancet Oncol. 2023; 24(4): 335346, doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00056-6, indexed in Pubmed: 36898391.
  26. Dagher H, Chaftari AM, Subbiah IM, et al. Long COVID in cancer patients: preponderance of symptoms in majority of patients over long time period. Elife. 2023; 12, doi: 10.7554/eLife.81182, indexed in Pubmed: 36748905.
  27. Fankuchen O, Lau J, Rajan M, et al. Long COVID in Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study of 1-year Mortality and Long COVID Prevalence Among Patients With Cancer Who Survived an Initial Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Am J Clin Oncol. 2023; 46(7): 300305, doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001005, indexed in Pubmed: 37072891.
  28. Davis HE, McCorkell L, Vogel JM, et al. Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023; 21(3): 133146, doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00846-2, indexed in Pubmed: 36639608.
  29. Cortellini A, Salazar R, Gennari A, et al. On Covid study group. Persistence of long-term COVID-19 sequelae in patients with cancer: An analysis from the OnCovid registry. Eur J Cancer. 2022; 170: 1016, doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.019, indexed in Pubmed: 35576848.
  30. Shoham S, Batista C, Ben Amor Y, et al. Lancet Commission on COVID-19 Vaccines and Therapeutics Task Force. Vaccines and therapeutics for immunocompromised patients with COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 59: 101965, doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101965, indexed in Pubmed: 37070102.
  31. Abbasi J. Researchers Tie Severe Immunosuppression to Chronic COVID-19 and Virus Variants. JAMA. 2021; 325(20): 20332035, doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.7212, indexed in Pubmed: 33950236.
  32. Rahmani A, Dini G, Leso V, et al. Duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding and infectivity in the working age population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Lav. 2022; 113(2): e2022014, doi: 10.23749/mdl.v113i2.12724, indexed in Pubmed: 35481581.
  33. Pérez-Lago L, Aldámiz-Echevarría T, García-Martínez R, et al. Different Within-Host Viral Evolution Dynamics in Severely Immunosuppressed Cases with Persistent SARS-CoV-2. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(7), doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9070808, indexed in Pubmed: 34356872.
  34. Maringe C, Spicer J, Morris M, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study. Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21(8): 10231034, doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30388-0, indexed in Pubmed: 32702310.
  35. Recommendations of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) COVID-19 Vaccination Advisory Committee. Version 8.0 03/06/2023 Internet: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2023. https://www.eviq.org.au/getmedia/6de8cf1f-54d5-4c5d-9045-f3b5ff384bbc/2021-covid-19-vaccination-guidance-v8-0.pdf.aspx (16.02.2024).
  36. Reimann H, Kremer AN, Blumenberg V, et al. Cellular and humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients after CD19.CAR T-cell therapy. Blood Adv. 2023; 7(10): 20662069, doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007806, indexed in Pubmed: 36206194.
  37. Mahalingam S, Peter J, Xu Z, et al. Landscape of humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19 disease and the value of antibody testing. Heliyon. 2021; 7(4): e06836, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06836, indexed in Pubmed: 33898857.
  38. Kamboj M, Bohlke K, Baptiste DM, et al. Vaccination of Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42(14): 16991721, doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00032, indexed in Pubmed: 38498792.
  39. Hus I, Piekarska A, Roliński J, et al. Szczepienia ochronne u dorosłych chorych na nowotwory hematologiczne oraz u chorych z asplenią zalecenia PTHiT i sekcji do spraw zakażeń PALG. Acta Haematologica Polonica. 2018; 49(3): 93101, doi: 10.2478/ahp-2018-0016.
  40. Furer V, Rondaan C, Heijstek M, et al. 2019 update of EULAR recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79(1): 3952, doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215882, indexed in Pubmed: 31413005.
  41. Antczak A, Nitsch-Osuch A, Balcerzak M, et al. Coalition Shaping the Vaccination Landscape. Vaccines (Basel). 2022; 10(12), doi: 10.3390/vaccines10122030, indexed in Pubmed: 36560440.
  42. ASCO COVID-19 Registry Data Dashboard Internet: ASCO; 2023. https://old-prod.asco.org/covid-resources/asco-registry/data-dashboard.
  43. The ASCO Post Staff. COVID-19 Vaccination Rates May Be Lower in Patients With Cancer Who Have Comorbidities, Certain Types of Cancer, and Specific Sociodemographic Factors Internet: ASCO; 2023. https://ascopost.com/news/march-2023/covid-19-vaccination-rates-may-be-lower-in-patients-with-cancer-who-have-comorbidities-certain-types-of-cancer-and-specific-sociodemographic-factors/.
  44. KUCHAR E, ANTCZAK A, SKOCZYŃSKA A, et al. Pneumococcal vaccination among adults updated Polish recommendations. Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. 2022; 24(3): 285291, doi: 10.5114/fmpcr.2022.119420.
  45. Taplitz RA, Kennedy EB, Bow EJ, et al. Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Adult Patients With Cancer-Related Immunosuppression: ASCO and IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(30): 30433054, doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00374, indexed in Pubmed: 30179565.
  46. Prevention and treatment of cancer-related infections (version 2.2023) Internet: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2023. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=3&id=1457 (12.02.2024).
  47. Prabani KIP, Weerasekara I, Damayanthi HD. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health. 2022; 212: 6675, doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.09.001, indexed in Pubmed: 36244261.
  48. Yong CW, Robinson A, Hong C. Dental Evaluation Prior to Cancer Therapy. Front Oral Health. 2022; 3: 876941, doi: 10.3389/froh.2022.876941, indexed in Pubmed: 35510226.
  49. Visweshwar N, Rico JF, Ayala I, et al. Insights into the Impact of Hesitancy on Cancer Care and COVID-19. Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(12), doi: 10.3390/cancers15123115, indexed in Pubmed: 37370725.
  50. Rubin LG, Levin MJ, Ljungman P, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America, Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2013 IDSA clinical practice guideline for vaccination of the immunocompromised host. Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 58(3): e44100, doi: 10.1093/cid/cit684, indexed in Pubmed: 24311479.
  51. Bersanelli M, Verzoni E, Cortellini A, et al. FICOG group (Federation of Italian Cooperative Oncology Groups). Impact of influenza vaccination on survival of patients with advanced cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (INVIDIa-2): final results of the multicentre, prospective, observational study. EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 61: 102044, doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102044, indexed in Pubmed: 37434748.
  52. Severe Viral Respiratory Illness Internet: Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention; 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/respiratory-viruses/data-research/dashboard/illness-severity.html (09.02.2024).
  53. Ściubisz. M. Ważne zmiany w refundacji szczepionek Internet: Medycyna Praktyczna; 2023. https://www.mp.pl/szczepienia/aktualnosci/330272,wazne-zmiany-w-refundacji-szczepionek (16.02.2024).
  54. Nowy program szczepień w Warszawie Internet: Polska Agencja Prasowa; 2023. https://www.pap.pl/aktualnosci/nowy-program-szczepien-w-warszawie-radni-zdecydowali.
  55. Opinia Prezesa Agencji Oceny Technologii Medycznych i Taryfikacji nr 166/2018 z dnia 17 sierpnia 2018 r. o projekcie programu polityki zdrowotnej pn. „Zapobieganie ciężkim zapaleniom płuc u chorych onkologicznych z najczęstszymi nowotworami litymi i hematologicznymi” realizowanego przez: województwo świętokrzyskie Internet: Agencja Oceny Technologii Medycznych i Taryfikacji; 2018. https://bipold.aotm.gov.pl/assets/files/oopz/2018/OP-0166-2018.pdf (13.02.2024).
  56. Program wieloletni pn. Narodowa Strategia Onkologiczna na lata 2020-2030. Ministarstwo Zdrowia, Warszawa 2020.
  57. Sobierajski T, Rzymski P, Małecka I, et al. Trust in Physicians in the Context of HPV Vaccination of Children from the Perspective of Social Exchange Theory: A Representative Study of Polish Parents. Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(10), doi: 10.3390/vaccines11101618, indexed in Pubmed: 37897019.
  58. GRYPA / RSV / COVID-19 antygenowy test combo Internet: Zwrotnik Raka; 2023. https://www.zwrotnikraka.pl/test-combo-grypa-rsv-covid/ (16.02.2023).
  59. Guidelines for the clinical management of severe illness from influenza virus infections Internet: World Health Organization; 2022. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/352453 (27.03.2024).
  60. Therapeutics and COVID-19. Living Guideline. 10 November 2023. World Health Organization, Geneva 2023.
  61. Hayden MK, Hanson KE, Englund JA, et al. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Antigen Testing (January 2023). Clin Infect Dis. 2024; 78(7): e350e384, doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad032, indexed in Pubmed: 36702617.
  62. Frediani J, Parsons R, McLendon K, et al. The New Normal: Delayed Peak SARS-CoV-2 Viral Loads Relative to Symptom Onset and Implications for COVID-19 Testing Programs. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2023; 78(2): 301307, doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad582.
  63. Charakterystyka Produktu Leczniczego Paxlovid. Data ostatniej aktualizacji 11.01.2024. Internet: European Medicines Agency; 2022 (16.02.2024).
  64. Flisiak R, Horban A, Jaroszewicz J, et al. Management of SARS-CoV-2 infection: recommendations of the Polish Association of Epidemiologists and Infectiologists as of February 23, 2022. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2022; 132(3), doi: 10.20452/pamw.16230, indexed in Pubmed: 35352546.
  65. Lagevrio (molnupiravir) Internet: European Medicines Agency; 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/lagevrio (16.02.2024).
  66. Wniosek o objęcie refundacją leku Paxlovid (nirmatrelvirum + ritonavirum) we wskazaniu: COVID-19 u pacjentów dorosłych, którzy nie wymagają tlenoterapii, i u których występuje zwiększone ryzyko progresji do ciężkiej postaci COVID-19. Agencja Oceny Technologii Medycznych i Taryfikacji, Warszawa 2023.
  67. Liverpool COVID-19 Interactions Internet: University of Liverpool; 2023. https://www.covid19-druginteractions.org/checker (16.02.2024).
  68. Havers FP, Pham H, Taylor CA, et al. COVID-19-Associated Hospitalizations Among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Adults 18 Years or Older in 13 US States, January 2021 to April 2022. JAMA Intern Med. 2022; 182(10): 10711081, doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.4299, indexed in Pubmed: 36074486.
  69. WHO roadmap on uses of COVID-19 vaccines in the context of Omicron and high population immunity Internet: World Health Organization; 2023. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/373987/WHO-2019-nCoV-Vaccines-SAGE-Prioritization-2023.2-eng.pdf?sequence=1 (27.03.2024).
  70. Wysocki J, Siewert B, Mastalerz-Migas A, et al. Vaccinations against COVID-19 in adults in the 2023/2024 season. Recommendations of the Polish Society of Vaccinology, the Polish Society of Family Medicine, the Polish Society of Epidemiology and Physicians of Infectious Diseases and the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians. Lekarz POZ. 2024; 10: 2334.
  71. Kalendarze szczepień dorosłych Internet: Polskie Towarzystwo Wakcynologii; 2024. https://ptwakc.org.pl/szczepienia-doroslych/ (27.03.2024).
  72. Sender V, Hentrich K, Henriques-Normark B. Virus-Induced Changes of the Respiratory Tract Environment Promote Secondary Infections With . Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021; 11: 643326, doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.643326, indexed in Pubmed: 33828999.
  73. Timing and Spacing of Immunobiologics Internet: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/general-recs/timing.html (27.03.2024).
  74. Considerations for Coadministering COVID, Flu and/or RSV Vaccines this Fall Internet: Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2023. https://www.idsociety.org/covid-19-real-time-learning-network/vaccines/considerations-for-coadministering-covid-flu-andor-rsv-vaccines-this-fall/#/+/0/publishedDate_na_dt/desc/ (27.03.2024).
  75. Kiedy najlepiej zaszczepić się przeciw grypie? Internet: Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego PZH - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy; 2023. https://szczepienia.pzh.gov.pl/faq/kiedy-najlepiej-zaszczepic-sie-przeciw-grypie/ (27.03.2024).
  76. COVID-19, influenza, and other respiratory viruses 2023-2024 autumn and winter season Internet: World Health Organization; 2023. https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/covid-19--influenza--and-other-respiratory-viruses---2023-2024-autumn-and-winter-season (27.03.2024).
  77. Hamid S, Winn A, Parikh R, et al. Seasonality of Respiratory Syncytial Virus - United States, 2017-2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023; 72(14): 355361, doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7214a1, indexed in Pubmed: 37022977.
  78. Frequently Asked Questions About RSV Vaccine for Adults Internet: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/rsv/hcp/older-adults-faqs.html (27.03.2024).
  79. Nitsch-Osuch A, Antczak A, Barczyk A, et al. Rekomendacje grupy ekspertów w zakresie szczepień przeciw wirusowi RS osób dorosłych. Lekarz POZ. 2023; 9: 301308.
  80. Obwieszczenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 11 grudnia 2023 r. w sprawie wykazu refundowanych leków, środków spożywczych specjalnego przeznaczenia żywieniowego oraz wyrobów medycznych na 1 stycznia 2024 r. . Dz. Urz. Min. Zdr. 2023.112: Ministerstwo Zdrowia; 2023.
  81. Charakterystyka Produktu Leczniczego Comirnaty. Data ostatniej aktualizacji 05.12.2023 Internet: European Medicines Agency; 2021. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/comirnaty (16.02.2024).
  82. Charakterystyka Produktu Leczniczego Prevenar 13. Data ostatniej aktualizacji 01.10.2021. Internet: European Medicines Agency; 2010. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/prevenar-13 (16.02.2024).
  83. Charakterystyka Produktu Leczniczego Apexxnar. Data ostatniej aktualizacji 09.10.2023. Internet: European Medicines Agency; 2022. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/apexxnar.
  84. Charakterystyka Produktu Leczniczego Nimenrix. Data ostatniej aktualizacji 17.05.2022. Internet: European Medicines Agency; 2012. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/nimenrix (16.02.2024).
  85. Charakterystyka Produktu Leczniczego Neisvac C. Data ostatniej aktualizacji 17.06.2022. Internet: Pfizer; 2009. https://www.pfizerpro.pl/produkty (16.02.2024).
  86. Charakterystyka Produktu Leczniczego Trumenba. Data ostatniej aktualizacji 19.10.2023. Internet: European Medicines Agency; 2017. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/trumenba (16.02.2024).
  87. Charakterystyka Produktu Leczniczego Abrysvo. Data ostatniej aktualizacji 23.08.2023. Internet: European Medicines Agency; 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/abrysvo (16.02.2024).