open access

Vol 48, No 4 (2016)
Original and clinical articles
Submitted: 2016-10-28
Get Citation

Anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Ultrasound-guided superficial/intermediate cervical plexus block combined with carotid sheath infiltration

Paweł Mądro, Alina Dąbrowska, Jarosław Jarecki, Piotr Garba
DOI: 10.5603/AIT.2016.0043
·
Pubmed: 27797095
·
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2016;48(4):234-238.

open access

Vol 48, No 4 (2016)
Original and clinical articles
Submitted: 2016-10-28

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy carries a significant risk of intraoperative brain ischaemia. Various methods for intraoperative cerebral function monitoring can be utilized, but the assessment of the patient’s consciousness remains the easiest and most available method, requiring that the patient remain awake and under local/regional anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare infiltration anaesthesia with an ultrasound–guided superficial/combined cervical plexus block for patient safety and comfort.

METHODS: Ninety-eight patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy were randomly assigned to receive either infiltration anaesthesia performed by the surgeon or an US-guided superficial/combined cervical plexus block. The pain intensity using the numerical rating scale (NRS), the volume of local anaesthetic used and the anaesthesia-related complications were recorded. The data were analysed using selected statistical tools.

RESULTS: In the US-guided group, a significantly lower volume of local anaesthetic was used (25 mL vs. 30 mL), and lower mean (1 vs. 3) and maximal (2 vs. 6) NRS scores were observed. However, hoarseness, cough and difficulty swallowing were significantly more frequent among those patients (90% vs. 27%, 30% vs. 12%, and 36% vs. 6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: Compared with infiltration anaesthesia, an US-guided superficial/combined cervical plexus block is an effective method for improving the comfort of the patient and the surgeon. The technique is safe, relatively simple and easy to master and requires little time to perform.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy carries a significant risk of intraoperative brain ischaemia. Various methods for intraoperative cerebral function monitoring can be utilized, but the assessment of the patient’s consciousness remains the easiest and most available method, requiring that the patient remain awake and under local/regional anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare infiltration anaesthesia with an ultrasound–guided superficial/combined cervical plexus block for patient safety and comfort.

METHODS: Ninety-eight patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy were randomly assigned to receive either infiltration anaesthesia performed by the surgeon or an US-guided superficial/combined cervical plexus block. The pain intensity using the numerical rating scale (NRS), the volume of local anaesthetic used and the anaesthesia-related complications were recorded. The data were analysed using selected statistical tools.

RESULTS: In the US-guided group, a significantly lower volume of local anaesthetic was used (25 mL vs. 30 mL), and lower mean (1 vs. 3) and maximal (2 vs. 6) NRS scores were observed. However, hoarseness, cough and difficulty swallowing were significantly more frequent among those patients (90% vs. 27%, 30% vs. 12%, and 36% vs. 6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: Compared with infiltration anaesthesia, an US-guided superficial/combined cervical plexus block is an effective method for improving the comfort of the patient and the surgeon. The technique is safe, relatively simple and easy to master and requires little time to perform.

Get Citation

Keywords

carotid endarterectomy, anaesthesia; cervical plexus, block; ultrasound

About this article
Title

Anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Ultrasound-guided superficial/intermediate cervical plexus block combined with carotid sheath infiltration

Journal

Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy

Issue

Vol 48, No 4 (2016)

Pages

234-238

DOI

10.5603/AIT.2016.0043

Pubmed

27797095

Bibliographic record

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2016;48(4):234-238.

Keywords

carotid endarterectomy
anaesthesia
cervical plexus
block
ultrasound

Authors

Paweł Mądro
Alina Dąbrowska
Jarosław Jarecki
Piotr Garba

References (16)
  1. Lawrence PF, Alves JC, Jicha D, et al. Incidence, timing, and causes of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 27(2): 329–334.
  2. Ricotta JJ, Aburahma A, Ascher E, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Vascular Surgery. Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 54(3): e1–31.
  3. Alamowitch S, Eliasziw M, Algra A, et al. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Risk, causes, and prevention of ischaemic stroke in elderly patients with symptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. Lancet. 2001; 357(9263): 1154–1160.
  4. Liapis CD, Bell PRF, Mikhailidis D, et al. ESVS Guidelines Collaborators. ESVS guidelines. Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009; 37(4 Suppl): 1–19.
  5. Stoneham MD, Stamou D, Mason J. Regional anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2015; 114(3): 372–383.
  6. Zawadzki A. Znieczulenie do operacji tętnic szyjnych. In: Szulc R. ed. Znieczulenie i intensywna terapia w chirurgii naczyń. alfa-medica Press, Bielsko Biała 1999.
  7. Rössel T, Kersting S, Heller AR, et al. Combination of high-resolution ultrasound-guided perivascular regional anesthesia of the internal carotid artery and intermediate cervical plexus block for carotid surgery. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013; 39(6): 981–986.
  8. Ciccozzi A, Angeletti C, Guetti C, et al. Regional anaesthesia techniques for carotid surgery: the state of art. J Ultrasound. 2014; 17(3): 175–183.
  9. GALA Tr, Lewis SC, Warlow CP, et al. GALA Trial Collaborative Group. General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet . 2008; 372: 2132–2142.
  10. Carling A, Simmonds M. Complications from regional anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2000; 84(6): 797–800.
  11. Thermann F, Ukkat J, John E, et al. Frequency of transient ipsilateral vocal cord paralysis in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia. J Vasc Surg. 2007; 46(1): 37–40.
  12. Ajduk M, Tudorić I, Sarlija M, et al. Effect of carotid sinus nerve blockade on hemodynamic stability during carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 54(2): 386–393.
  13. Calderon AL, Zetlaoui P, Benatir F, et al. Ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block for carotid endarterectomy using a new anterior approach: a two-centre prospective observational study. Anaesthesia. 2015; 70(4): 445–451.
  14. Martusevicius R, Swiatek F, Joergensen LG, et al. Ultrasound-guided locoregional anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a prospective observational study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012; 44(1): 27–30.
  15. Roessel T, Wiessner D, Heller AR, et al. High-resolution ultrasound-guided high interscalene plexus block for carotid endarterectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007; 32(3): 247–253.
  16. Koköfer A, Nawratil J, Felder TK, et al. Ropivacaine 0.375% vs. 0.75% with prilocaine for intermediate cervical plexus block for carotid endarterectomy: A randomised trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015; 32(11): 781–789.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

VM Media sp. z o.o. VM Group sp.k., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73 St., 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl