open access

Vol 49, No 1 (2017)
Original and clinical articles
Published online: 2017-03-31
Submitted: 2016-06-30
Accepted: 2016-12-04
Get Citation

Comparison of anaesthetic gas consumption and stability of anaesthesia using automatic and manual control over the course of anaesthesia

Tomasz Skalec, Agnieszka Górecka-Dolny, Stanisław Zieliński, Mirosław Gibek, Łukasz Stróżecki, Andrzej Kübler
DOI: 10.5603/AIT.2017.0008
·
Pubmed: 28362031
·
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2017;49(1):34-39.

open access

Vol 49, No 1 (2017)
Original and clinical articles
Published online: 2017-03-31
Submitted: 2016-06-30
Accepted: 2016-12-04

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The automatic control module of end-tidal volatile agents (EtC) was designed to reduce the consumption of anaesthetic gases, increase the stability of general anaesthesia and reduce the need for adjustments in the settings of the anaesthesia machine. The aim of this study was to verify these hypotheses.

METHODS: The course of general anaesthesia with the use of the EtC module was analysed for haemodynamic stability, depth of anaesthesia, end-expiratory concentration of anaesthetic, number of ventilator key presses, fentanyl supply, consumption of volatile agents and anaesthesia and operation times. These data were compared with the data obtained during general anaesthesia controlled manually and were processed with statistical tests.

RESULTS: Seventy-four patients underwent general anaesthesia for scheduled operations. Group AUTO-ET (n = 35) was anaesthetized with EtC, and group MANUAL-ET (n = 39) was controlled manually. Both populations presented similar anaesthesia stability. No differences were noted in the time of anaesthesia, saturation up to MAC 1.0 or awakening. Data revealed no differences in mean EtAA or the fentanyl dose. The AUTO-ET group exhibited fewer key presses per minute, 0.0603 min-1, whereas the MANUAL-ET exhibited a value of 0.0842 min-1; P = 0.001. The automatic group consumed more anaesthetic and oxygen per minute (sevoflurane 0.1171 mL min-1; IQR: 0.0503; oxygen 1.8286 mL min-1, IQR: 1,3751) than MANUAL-ET (sevoflurane 0.0824 mL min-1, IQR: 0.0305; oxygen 1,288 mL min-1, IQR: 0,6517) (P = 0.0028 and P = 0.0171, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Both methods are equally stable and safe for patients. The consumption of volatile agents was significantly increased in the AUTO-ET group. EtC considerably reduces the number of key presses.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The automatic control module of end-tidal volatile agents (EtC) was designed to reduce the consumption of anaesthetic gases, increase the stability of general anaesthesia and reduce the need for adjustments in the settings of the anaesthesia machine. The aim of this study was to verify these hypotheses.

METHODS: The course of general anaesthesia with the use of the EtC module was analysed for haemodynamic stability, depth of anaesthesia, end-expiratory concentration of anaesthetic, number of ventilator key presses, fentanyl supply, consumption of volatile agents and anaesthesia and operation times. These data were compared with the data obtained during general anaesthesia controlled manually and were processed with statistical tests.

RESULTS: Seventy-four patients underwent general anaesthesia for scheduled operations. Group AUTO-ET (n = 35) was anaesthetized with EtC, and group MANUAL-ET (n = 39) was controlled manually. Both populations presented similar anaesthesia stability. No differences were noted in the time of anaesthesia, saturation up to MAC 1.0 or awakening. Data revealed no differences in mean EtAA or the fentanyl dose. The AUTO-ET group exhibited fewer key presses per minute, 0.0603 min-1, whereas the MANUAL-ET exhibited a value of 0.0842 min-1; P = 0.001. The automatic group consumed more anaesthetic and oxygen per minute (sevoflurane 0.1171 mL min-1; IQR: 0.0503; oxygen 1.8286 mL min-1, IQR: 1,3751) than MANUAL-ET (sevoflurane 0.0824 mL min-1, IQR: 0.0305; oxygen 1,288 mL min-1, IQR: 0,6517) (P = 0.0028 and P = 0.0171, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Both methods are equally stable and safe for patients. The consumption of volatile agents was significantly increased in the AUTO-ET group. EtC considerably reduces the number of key presses.

Get Citation

Keywords

anaesthesia, general; anaesthetic, volatile, sevoflurane; automatic control

About this article
Title

Comparison of anaesthetic gas consumption and stability of anaesthesia using automatic and manual control over the course of anaesthesia

Journal

Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy

Issue

Vol 49, No 1 (2017)

Pages

34-39

Published online

2017-03-31

DOI

10.5603/AIT.2017.0008

Pubmed

28362031

Bibliographic record

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2017;49(1):34-39.

Keywords

anaesthesia
general
anaesthetic
volatile
sevoflurane
automatic control

Authors

Tomasz Skalec
Agnieszka Górecka-Dolny
Stanisław Zieliński
Mirosław Gibek
Łukasz Stróżecki
Andrzej Kübler

References (11)
  1. Eger E, White P, Bogetz M. Clinical and Economic Factors Important to Anaesthetic Choice for Day-Case Surgery. PharmacoEconomics. 2000; 17(3): 245–262.
  2. Brattwall M, Warrén-Stomberg M, Hesselvik F, et al. Brief review: theory and practice of minimal fresh gas flow anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2012; 59(8): 785–797.
  3. Lockwood GG. Measuring the costs of inhaled anaestheticsdagger. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2001; 87(4): 559–563.
  4. Schober P, Loer SA. An innovative anaesthesia machine: the closed system. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2005; 18(6): 640–644.
  5. Schober P, Loer SA. Closed system anaesthesia--historical aspects and recent developments. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006; 23(11): 914–920.
  6. Lortat-Jacob B, Billard V, Buschke W, et al. Assessing the clinical or pharmaco-economical benefit of target controlled desflurane delivery in surgical patients using the Zeus anaesthesia machine. Anaesthesia. 2009; 64(11): 1229–1235.
  7. Singaravelu S, Barclay P. Automated control of end-tidal inhalation anaesthetic concentration using the GE Aisys Carestation™. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 110(4): 561–566.
  8. Lucangelo U, Garufi G, Marras E, et al. End-tidal versus manually-controlled low-flow anaesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput. 2014; 28(2): 117–121.
  9. Kennedy RR, French RA. A ten-year audit of fresh gas flows in a New Zealand hospital: the influence of the introduction of automated agent delivery and comparisons with other hospitals. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014; 42(1): 65–72.
  10. Struys MM, Kalmar AF, De Baerdemaeker LEC, et al. Time course of inhaled anaesthetic drug delivery using a new multifunctional closed-circuit anaesthesia ventilator. In vitro comparison with a classical anaesthesia machine. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 94(3): 306–317.
  11. De Cooman S, De Mey N, Dewulf BBc, et al. Desflurane Consumption During Automated Closed-circuit Delivery is Higher Than When a Conventional Anesthesia Machine is Used With a Simple Vaporizer-O₂-N₂O Fresh Gas Flow Sequence. BMC Anesthesiol. 2008; 8: 4.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

VM Media sp. z o.o. VM Group sp.k., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73 St., 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl