open access

Vol 45, No 1 (2013 Jan-Mar)
Original and clinical articles
Published online: 2013-03-19
Submitted: 2013-03-19
Get Citation

A randomised comparison between Cobra PLA and classic laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube during mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia

Paweł Ratajczyk, Beata Małachowska, Ewelina Gaszyńska, Tomasz Gaszyński
DOI: 10.5603/AIT.2013.0004
·
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2013;45(1):20-24.

open access

Vol 45, No 1 (2013 Jan-Mar)
Original and clinical articles
Published online: 2013-03-19
Submitted: 2013-03-19

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare ventilation parameters during mechanical ventilation using Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA), Laryngeal Tube (LT), and Peri-Laryngeal Airway Cobra (PLA).

METHODS: In a prospective, randomised controlled trial, 90 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery were divided into three subgroups. The settings of controlled ventilation were: oxygen 50%, air 50%, sevoflurane 1.5–2.0%, TV 7 mL kg–1, RR 10 breath min–1, inspiratory/expiratory ratio 1:2 and FGF 3 L min–1. The number of attempts, time taken to insert the device, airway pressure (peak airway pressure, plateau airway pressure), air leak (inspiratory and expiratory volume difference), and dynamic compliance were measured. The timepoints for collecting data were after successful insertion of the device, and after ten, 20, 30 and 50 mins of ventilation. The presence of visible blood traces, patients’ assessment of their throat soreness, dysphonia and dysphagia were noted postoperatively.

RESULTS: The success rates at first insertion were 90% and 80% and 90%, while time for insertion was 5 sec and 21.94 sec and 5.24 sec in the Cobra PLA, LMA and LT groups respectively. Ventilation pressures during procedure were highest in the LT group, where compliance was lowest compared to the Cobra PLA and LMA groups. The air leak was similar in all the groups. 30% vs. 40% vs. 10% of devices had positive blood traces; 20% vs. 40% vs. 30% of patients suffered from a sore throat; and 30% vs. 30% and 30% of patients suffered from dysphagia in the Cobra PLA, LMA and LT groups respectively.

CONCLUSION: The differences were small, but Cobra PLA seemed to be slightly superior in terms of the measured parameters.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare ventilation parameters during mechanical ventilation using Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA), Laryngeal Tube (LT), and Peri-Laryngeal Airway Cobra (PLA).

METHODS: In a prospective, randomised controlled trial, 90 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery were divided into three subgroups. The settings of controlled ventilation were: oxygen 50%, air 50%, sevoflurane 1.5–2.0%, TV 7 mL kg–1, RR 10 breath min–1, inspiratory/expiratory ratio 1:2 and FGF 3 L min–1. The number of attempts, time taken to insert the device, airway pressure (peak airway pressure, plateau airway pressure), air leak (inspiratory and expiratory volume difference), and dynamic compliance were measured. The timepoints for collecting data were after successful insertion of the device, and after ten, 20, 30 and 50 mins of ventilation. The presence of visible blood traces, patients’ assessment of their throat soreness, dysphonia and dysphagia were noted postoperatively.

RESULTS: The success rates at first insertion were 90% and 80% and 90%, while time for insertion was 5 sec and 21.94 sec and 5.24 sec in the Cobra PLA, LMA and LT groups respectively. Ventilation pressures during procedure were highest in the LT group, where compliance was lowest compared to the Cobra PLA and LMA groups. The air leak was similar in all the groups. 30% vs. 40% vs. 10% of devices had positive blood traces; 20% vs. 40% vs. 30% of patients suffered from a sore throat; and 30% vs. 30% and 30% of patients suffered from dysphagia in the Cobra PLA, LMA and LT groups respectively.

CONCLUSION: The differences were small, but Cobra PLA seemed to be slightly superior in terms of the measured parameters.

Get Citation

Keywords

airways, artificial, extraglottic devices, ventilation, mechanical

About this article
Title

A randomised comparison between Cobra PLA and classic laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube during mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia

Journal

Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy

Issue

Vol 45, No 1 (2013 Jan-Mar)

Pages

20-24

Published online

2013-03-19

DOI

10.5603/AIT.2013.0004

Bibliographic record

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2013;45(1):20-24.

Keywords

airways
artificial
extraglottic devices
ventilation
mechanical

Authors

Paweł Ratajczyk
Beata Małachowska
Ewelina Gaszyńska
Tomasz Gaszyński

Important: This website uses cookies.tanya dokter More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

VM Media sp. z o.o. VM Group sp.k., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73 St., 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl