open access

Vol 77, No 4 (2009)
ORIGINAL PAPERS
Published online: 2009-06-26
Submitted: 2013-02-22
Get Citation

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration in lung cancer

Artur Szlubowski, Marcin Zieliński, Joanna Figura, Jolanta Hauer, Witold Sośnicki, Juliusz Pankowski, Anna Obrochta, Magdalena Jakubiak
Pneumonol Alergol Pol 2009;77(4):357-362.

open access

Vol 77, No 4 (2009)
ORIGINAL PAPERS
Published online: 2009-06-26
Submitted: 2013-02-22

Abstract


Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield of transoesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration (EUS-NA) in lung cancer (LC).
Material and methods: Real time EUS-NA was performed under local anaesthesia and sedation in consecutive LC patients. All negative EUS-NA results in NSCLC patients were verified by transcervical extended bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy (TEMLA).
Results: In 146 patients there were 206 biopsies performed in lymph node stations: subcarinal (7):124, left lower paratracheal (4L):70, paraoesophageal (8):9 and pulmonary ligament (9):3. A mean short axis of punctured node was 10 ± 6.3 (95% CI) mm. Lymph node biopsy was technically successful in 95.6% and was diagnostic in 40.1% of LC patients. In NSCLC staging, the sensitivity of EUS-NA calculated on the per-patient basis was 85.5%, specificity 100%, accuracy 93.6% and negative predictive value (NPV) 89.7% in stations accessible for EUS-NA, but in all mediastinal stations it was 70.7%, 100%, 84.3% and 74.7, respectively (p = 0.009). The sensitivity of EUS-NA in NSCLC staging patients, calculated on the per-biopsy basis was 88.6%, specificity 100%, accuracy 95.4% and NPV 91.4%. A diagnostic yield of EUS-NA on the per-biopsy basis was higher for station 4L than 7, but the difference was not significant (χ2 p = 0.4).
Conclusions: The diagnostic value of EUS-NA in LC is high. In NSCLC staging EUS-NA is insufficient and should be complemented by other invasive techniques, especially those that give access to the right paratracheal region.

Abstract


Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield of transoesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration (EUS-NA) in lung cancer (LC).
Material and methods: Real time EUS-NA was performed under local anaesthesia and sedation in consecutive LC patients. All negative EUS-NA results in NSCLC patients were verified by transcervical extended bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy (TEMLA).
Results: In 146 patients there were 206 biopsies performed in lymph node stations: subcarinal (7):124, left lower paratracheal (4L):70, paraoesophageal (8):9 and pulmonary ligament (9):3. A mean short axis of punctured node was 10 ± 6.3 (95% CI) mm. Lymph node biopsy was technically successful in 95.6% and was diagnostic in 40.1% of LC patients. In NSCLC staging, the sensitivity of EUS-NA calculated on the per-patient basis was 85.5%, specificity 100%, accuracy 93.6% and negative predictive value (NPV) 89.7% in stations accessible for EUS-NA, but in all mediastinal stations it was 70.7%, 100%, 84.3% and 74.7, respectively (p = 0.009). The sensitivity of EUS-NA in NSCLC staging patients, calculated on the per-biopsy basis was 88.6%, specificity 100%, accuracy 95.4% and NPV 91.4%. A diagnostic yield of EUS-NA on the per-biopsy basis was higher for station 4L than 7, but the difference was not significant (χ2 p = 0.4).
Conclusions: The diagnostic value of EUS-NA in LC is high. In NSCLC staging EUS-NA is insufficient and should be complemented by other invasive techniques, especially those that give access to the right paratracheal region.
Get Citation

Keywords

endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration; transcervical extended bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy; non-small cell lung cancer

About this article
Title

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration in lung cancer

Journal

Advances in Respiratory Medicine

Issue

Vol 77, No 4 (2009)

Pages

357-362

Published online

2009-06-26

Bibliographic record

Pneumonol Alergol Pol 2009;77(4):357-362.

Keywords

endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration
transcervical extended bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy
non-small cell lung cancer

Authors

Artur Szlubowski
Marcin Zieliński
Joanna Figura
Jolanta Hauer
Witold Sośnicki
Juliusz Pankowski
Anna Obrochta
Magdalena Jakubiak

References (26)
  1. Herth FJF, Krasnik M, Kahn N, et al. Real-time endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes. Thorax. 2006; 61(9): 795–798.
  2. Krasnik M, Vilmann P, Larsen SS, et al. Preliminary experience with a new method of endoscopic transbronchial real time ultrasound guided biopsy for diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lesions. Thorax. 2003; 58(12): 1083–1086.
  3. Fujiwara T, Yasufuku K, Nakajima T, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2005; 50(3): 347–354.
  4. Toloza EM, Harpole L, McCrory DC. Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the current evidence. Chest. 2003; 123(1 Suppl): 137S–146S.
  5. Annema JT, Rabe KF. in non-small cell lung cancer. Hawes H., Fockens P., Endosonography. Saunders Elsevier. 2006; 7: 61–72.
  6. Varadarajulu S, Schmulewitz N, Wildi SM, et al. Accuracy of EUS in staging of T4 lung cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59(3): 345–348.
  7. Eloubeidi MA, Seewald S, Tamhane A, et al. EUS-guided FNA of the left adrenal gland in patients with thoracic or GI malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59(6): 627–633.
  8. Larsen SS, Krasnik M, Vilmann P, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy of mediastinal lesions has a major impact on patient management. Thorax. 2002; 57(2): 98–103.
  9. Rintoul RC, Skwarski KM, Murchison JT, et al. Endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided real-time fine-needle aspiration for mediastinal staging. Eur Respir J. 2005; 25(3): 416–421.
  10. Larsen SS, Vilmann P, Krasnik M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy versus mediastinoscopy for analysis of paratracheal and subcarinal lymph nodes in lung cancer staging. Lung Cancer. 2005; 48(1): 85–92.
  11. Ernst A, Anantham D, Eberhardt R, et al. Diagnosis of mediastinal adenopathy-real-time endobronchial ultrasound guided needle aspiration versus mediastinoscopy. J Thorac Oncol. 2008; 3(6): 577–582.
  12. Toloza EM, Harpole L, Detterbeck F, et al. Invasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the current evidence. Chest. 2003; 123(1 Suppl): 157S–166S.
  13. De Leyn P, Lardinois D, Van Schil P, et al. ESTS. European trends in preoperative and intraoperative nodal staging: ESTS guidelines. J Thorac Oncol. 2007; 2(4): 357–361.
  14. Detterbeck FC, Jantz MA, Wallace M, et al. American College of Chest Physicians. Invasive mediastinal staging of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007; 132(3 Suppl): 202S–220S.
  15. Kuzdzał J, Zieliński M, Papla B, et al. Transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy--the new operative technique and early results in lung cancer staging. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005; 27(3): 384–390.
  16. Zieliński M. Transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy: results of staging in two hundred fifty-six patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007; 2(4): 370–372.
  17. Mountain CF, Dresler CM. Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. Chest. 1997; 111(6): 1718–1723.
  18. Vilmann P, Krasnik M, Larsen SS, et al. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) biopsy: a combined approach in the evaluation of mediastinal lesions. Endoscopy. 2005; 37(9): 833–839.
  19. Annema JT, Versteegh MI, Veseliç M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer and its impact on surgical staging. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(33): 8357–8361.
  20. Annema JT, Versteegh MI, Veseliç M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound added to mediastinoscopy for preoperative staging of patients with lung cancer. JAMA. 2005; 294(8): 931–936.
  21. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Eloubeidi MA. Accessing the aortopulmonary window (#5) and the paraaortic (#6) lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 84(3): 940–945.
  22. Kuzdzał J, Zieliński M, Papla B, et al. The transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy versus cervical mediastinoscopy in non-small cell lung cancer staging. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007; 31(1): 88–94.
  23. Micames CG, McCrory DC, Pavey DA, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for non-small cell lung cancer staging: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Chest. 2007; 131(2): 539–548.
  24. Wigle DA. The beginning of the end of mediastinoscopy? J Thorac Oncol. 2008; 3(6): 561–562.
  25. Wallace MB, Pascual JMS, Raimondo M, et al. Minimally invasive endoscopic staging of suspected lung cancer. JAMA. 2008; 299(5): 540–546.
  26. Szlubowski A, Kużdżał J, Pankowski J, et al. Przezoskrzelowa biopsja węzłów chłonnych śródpiersia i wnęk płuca pod kontrolą ultrasonografii wewnątrzoskrzelowej w czasie rzeczywistym w diagnostyce raka płuca i sarkoidozy. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2008; 76: 229–236.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

Czasopismo Pneumonologia i Alergologia Polska dostęne jest również w Ikamed - księgarnia medyczna

Wydawcą serwisu jest "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl