Introduction
An association between hypocholesterolemia and various malignant tumors such as colon, pancreatic, ovarian, and lung cancer has been determined [1]. In addition, alterations in lipid profile in hematological malignancies including leukemia have been demonstrated in the course of disease and treatment. Acute leukemia is a neoplastic transformation where there is proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow, blood and extramedullary sites. Several studies have reported changes in the lipid’s metabolism at the time of a diagnosis of leukemia. Although investigators have reported decreased total cholesterol (TC), decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and elevated triglyceride (TG) in leukemic patients, there is uncertainty about these changes regarding different types of leukemia and differences between children and adults [2]. Some studies have demonstrated that lipid profile in patients with leukemia can be considered as a possible prognostic factor, and might be used as a simple test to follow the response to chemotherapy [3–5]. This study was carried out to evaluate the lipid profile among Egyptian patients who had been diagnosed with acute myeloid and lymphoid leukemia, at the time of their diagnosis and the impacts on their prognosis.
Material and methods
This is a prospective study conducted on patients with acute leukemia admitted to the Oncology Center at Mansoura University, Egypt in 2018 and 2019.
A total of 50 adult patients (25 males and 25 females), diagnosed with de novo acute leukemia on the basis of peripheral blood morphology, bone marrow (BM), and flow cytometry,were included. Immunophenotyping (Coulter Epics XL Flow Cytometer PN 42372238 B, Coulter Corporation, Miami, FL, USA) was used to confirm the diagnosis; Cyt. MPO, CD13, CD33, and CD117 were the primary panel for myeloid lineage, CD14, CD36, and CD11b for M4 and M5, CD61 and glycophorin A for M6, and CD41 and CD42 for M7. CD20, CD10, CD79a, CD3, CD5, CD7, and TDT were the panel for lymphoid lineage.
Blood specimens for lipid profile assessment were collected after a conclusive diagnosis, and segregated serum was kept in a freezer for lipid testing. Blood specimens were collected without anticoagulant and serum was separated from red blood cells (RBCs) by centrifugation. Triglyceride and total cholesterol were determined using laboratory kits. Direct analysis of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was done using kits (ELITECH, France). LDL-cholesterol direct SL kits also from ELITECH were used for direct analysis of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). All measurements were done by an open system HITACHI 902 autoanalyzer automatically.
All patients received intensive induction therapy (there was no control group): cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day for 5–7 days intravenous (i.v.) continuous infusion and doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 for 2–3 days i.v. for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), Hyper-CVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) or augmented BFM (Berlin–Frankfurt–Münster) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) [max. chemotherapy dosage not exceeding surface area (SA) = 2]. Patients were classified according to their body mass index (BMI) as overweight and obese patients (29 patients), or others (16).
The study design was approved by The Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt (code number: R.19.09.607)
Statistical analysis
Data was analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Scientists) 16. A two-tailed p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. For descriptive statistics of qualitative variables, the frequency distribution procedure was run with calculation of the number of cases and percentages. For descriptive statistics of quantitative variables, the mean and standard deviation or the median and range was used. An association between categorical variables was tested by a Chi square test, or by Fishers exact test if the assumptions of Chi square were violated. Survival and relapse-free survival analyses were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons of survival were performed using a log-rank test.
Results
This prospective study analyzed 50 de novo acute leukemia patients [25 (50%) males, and 25 (50%) females]. Mean age was 39.5 years (range 16–69). 34 (68%) patients were AML, and 16 (32%) were ALL. Five patients (10%) had diabetes, and eight (16%) had hypertension. In the ALL patients, t(9;22) was done in four patients [positive in one (25%) and negative in three (75%)], and 11q23 re-arrangement was done in four patients (negative in all). In the AML patients, inv(16) was done in 12 patients [positive in three (25%) and negative in nine (75%)], t(8;21) was done in 11 patients [positive in two (18.2%) and negative in nine (81.8%)], and t(15;17) was done in three AML (M3) patients [positive in all (100%)]. 29 (58%) patients were overweight or obese based on their body mass index (BMI). Basic data is set out in Table I.
Variables |
No |
[%] |
|
Gender |
M:F |
25:25 |
50:50 |
Leukemia type |
AML |
34 |
68 |
ALL |
16 |
32 |
|
CBC |
WBC |
66.5 |
0.6–498 |
Hb |
8.5 |
3.8–13.6 |
|
PLT |
56.3 |
5–296 |
|
Blast cells |
69.3 |
20–100 |
|
BMI |
Overweight + obese |
29 |
58 |
Others |
16 |
32 |
|
Missing |
5 |
10 |
|
TG level |
Hypertriglyceridemic |
28 |
56 |
Normal |
22 |
44 |
|
Cholesterol level |
Hypercholesterolemic |
25 |
50 |
Normal |
25 |
50 |
|
HDL level |
Low level (risky) |
22 |
44 |
Normal |
28 |
56 |
|
LDL level |
Elevated |
23 |
46 |
Normal |
27 |
54 |
|
Total cholesterol/HDL ratio |
High risk |
21 |
42 |
Normal and borderline |
29 |
58 |
Overweight/obese patients showed a statistically more significant association with female patients than male patients (٦٥.٥%, p = 0.009). Female patients were statistically significantly associated with high cholesterol level (64%, p = 0.048), low HDL level (60%, p = 0.023), and elevated LDL level (60%, p = 0.047) (Table II).
Variables |
Male |
Female |
p |
|
BMI* |
Overweight/obese |
10 (34.5%) |
19 (65.5%) |
0.009 |
Others |
12 (75%) |
4 (25%) |
||
TG level |
Hypertriglyceridemic |
14 (56%) |
14 (56%) |
1 |
Normal |
11 (44%) |
11 (44%) |
||
Cholesterol level |
Hypercholesterolemic |
9 (36%) |
16 (64%) |
0.048 |
Normal |
16 (64%) |
9 (36%) |
||
HDL level |
Low level (risky) |
7 (28%) |
15 (60%) |
0.023 |
Normal |
18 (72%) |
10 (40%) |
||
LDL level |
Elevated |
8 (32%) |
15 (60%) |
0.047 |
Normal |
17 (68%) |
10 (40%) |
In comparing the lipid profile between overweight/obese patients and other patients, there was no statistically significant association (Table III).
Variables |
Overweight/ |
Others |
p |
|
TG level |
Hypertriglyceridemic |
15 (51.7%) |
10 (62.5%) |
0.48 |
Normal |
14 (48.3%) |
6 (37.5%) |
||
Cholesterol level |
Hypercholesterolemic |
12 (41.4%) |
9 (56.3%) |
0.33 |
Normal |
17 (58.6%) |
7 (43.8%) |
||
HDL level |
Low level (risky) |
14 (48.3%) |
7 (43.8%) |
0.77 |
Normal |
15 (51.7%) |
9 (56.3%) |
||
LDL level |
Elevated |
11 (37.9%) |
8 (50%) |
0.43 |
Normal |
18 (62.1%) |
8 (50%) |
76.7% of AML patients were overweight or obese (p = 0.015), while 81.3% of ALL patients showed hypertriglyceridemia (p = 0.014) (Table IV).
Variables |
ALL |
AML |
p |
|
BMI* |
Overweight/ |
6 (40%) |
23 (76.7%) |
0.015 |
Others |
9 (60%) |
7 (23.3%) |
||
TG level |
Hypertriglyceridemic |
13 (81.2%) |
15 (44.1%) |
0.014 |
Normal |
3 (18.8%) |
19 (55.9%) |
||
Cholesterol level |
Hypercholesterolemic |
10 (62.5%) |
15 (44.1%) |
0.2 |
Normal |
6 (37.5%) |
19 (55.9%) |
||
HDL level |
Low level (risky) |
7 (43.8%) |
15 (44.1%) |
0.9 |
Normal |
9 (56.2%) |
19 (55.9%) |
||
LDL level |
Elevated |
9 (56.2%) |
14 (41.2%) |
0.32 |
Normal |
7 (43.8%) |
20 (58.8%) |
||
Total cholesterol/ |
High risk |
8 (50%) |
13 (38.2%) |
0.75 |
Normal and borderline |
8 (50%) |
21 (61.8%) |
There was no statistically significant association between lipid profile and complete response (CR) rate, although there was a marginally significant association between non-CR rate and overweight and obese patients (p = 0.051) (Table V). In addition, there was no impact of BMI or lipid profile on overall survival among acute leukemia patients.
Variables |
CR |
Non-CR |
p |
|
BMI* |
Overweight/ |
13 (52%) |
16 (80%) |
0.051 |
Others |
12 (48%) |
4 |
||
TG level |
Hypertriglyceridemic |
17 (65.4%) |
11 (45.8%) |
0.16 |
Normal |
9 (34.6%) |
13 (54.2%) |
||
Cholesterol level |
Hypercholesterolemic |
11 (42.3%) |
14 (58.3%) |
0.25 |
Normal |
15 (57.7%) |
10 (41.7%) |
||
HDL level |
Low level (risky) |
10 (38.5%) |
12 (50%) |
0.41 |
Normal |
16 (61.5%) |
12 (50%) |
||
LDL level |
Elevated |
10 (38.5%) |
13 (54.2%) |
0.26 |
Normal |
16 (61.5%) |
11 (45.8%) |
Discussion
The high rate of expansion and metabolism in cancer cells associated with decreased intracellular cholesterol and other lipids may lead to LDL receptor overexpression. For example, in myeloblast cells, LDL uptake can increase by up to 100-fold. Many attempts have been made to evaluate the correlation between serum lipids in leukemic patients and disease activity and response to chemotherapy [3, 6].
Epidemiological data suggests a significant association between increased BMI and hematological neoplasms [7]. Several large studies have revealed an association between a high incidence of leukemia and being overweight, and suggested that obesity is a poor prognostic factor for leukemia [8, 9]. In our study, 76.7% of AML patients were overweight or obese, as opposed to 40% of ALL patients (p = 0.015).
Our data showed that female patients were significantly overweight/obese (p = 0.009), and were more associated with increased TC level (p = 0.048), low HDL level (p = 0.023), and elevated LDL level (p = 0.047) than male patients. This data accords with that of Mehrabani et al. [9] who found that the incidence of obesity and overweight was higher in females than in males, and of Safford et al. [10] who found that females have higher TC and LDL levels than males.
In comparing the lipid profile in overweight/obese patients to that of others, no significant difference was found. 81.3% of ALL cases were associated with hypertriglyceridemia compared to 44.1% of AML cases (p = 0.014). Babu et al. [11] demonstrated that only TC and LDL cholesterol showed significant differences between obese and non-obese individuals, and other parameters like HDL and TG did not show any significant difference.
On the other hand, Einollahi et al. [12] reported hypertriglyceridemia and a decline in TC, HDL and LDL among leukemic patients. Also, similar results have been observed by Naik et al. [8] (in 55 leukemic patients) and Tao et al. [13] (in 86 ALL patients).
As regards response rate and BMI, 80% of patients who did not achieve complete response were obese or overweight (p = 0.051), which aligns with Orgel et al. [14] who found that obesity was associated with residual leukemia following induction therapy for childhood B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and with Elazab et al. [15] who reported that overweight and obesity were associated with decreased complete response rates in adult AML patients (p = 0.004).
Targeting the metabolic profiles in leukemia cells could improve the outcome of leukemia patients. Statins possess several anti-leukemia effects such as apoptosis, anti-proliferation, and autophagy. Preliminary data has suggested that statins have anti-leukemia activities [16–18]. Two clinical trials have further revealed that statins can improve the efficacy of standard therapy in AML [19, 20].
Conclusions
Female, and acute myeloid leukemia, patients were more commonly associated with overweight and obesity, and a high TG level was found to be associated with acute lymphoid leukemia. Changes in lipid profile showed no impact on the complete response rate in acute leukemia patients. However, 80% of patients who did not achieve complete response were obese or overweight.
Further studies are needed to understand the correlations between metabolic profile and leukemia to help in developing new therapeutic approaches.
Authors’ contributions
SE-A, FEIG — data collection and statistical analysis. SE-A, FEIG, TEA, MME, MAG — scientific writing. SA, MA — laboratory analysis. TEA, SA, MA, MME, MAG, FEIG, SE-A — article review.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financial support
This study was not supported by any funding agency.
Ethics
The work described in this article has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans; EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments and uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals.