English Polski
Vol 28, No 2 (2022)
Case report
Published online: 2022-08-16

open access

Page views 4151
Article views/downloads 423
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Type 2 endoleak embolization and utilization of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE-MRA) as a non-invasive imaging follow-up method.

Radosław Pietura1, Joanna Elżbieta Kobak23, Kinga Kwolek1, Stanisław Przywara3, Tomasz Zubilewicz3
Acta Angiologica 2022;28(2):63-68.

Abstract

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a minimally invasive technique widely used in abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment. The most common complications after EVAR remain endoleaks, type 2 endoleak (T2EL) being the most prevalent. T2EL detection and surveillance require imaging techniques such as computed tomography angiography (CTA), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), Doppler ultrasound, or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). However, these modalities are associated with numerous limitations, including exposure to ionizing radiation, contrast media administration, or operator dependency, as in the case of ultrasonography. A non-contrast-enhanced MRA could be a substitute non-invasive method for endoleak monitoring. Our case report describes an 83-year-old female patient with type 2 endoleak and enlarging aneurysm sac detected on a CT scan. Despite the enormous aneurysm size, the patient underwent endovascular treatment owing to multiple comorbidities. Due to challenging feeding vessel anatomy, catheterization of the aneurysmal sac was impossible. Attempted polymerization of the aneurysmal sac with Glubran-2 partially sealed the sac and obliterated the feeders' inflow. Unfortunately, a non-targeted embolization resulted in the loss of patency of the right feeder and adjacent communicating branch. The patient underwent follow-up imaging that included non-contrast-enhanced as well as contrast-enhanced MRA. The examination revealed the presence of a small residual endoleak, a freshly formed thrombus, and areas of old thrombi. The NCE-MR appeared to be a valuable tool in endoleak detection and provided a detailed clot morphology.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Guo Q, Du X, Zhao J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017; 12(2): e0170600.
  2. Chen JX, Stavropoulos SW. Type 2 Endoleak Management. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2020; 37(4): 365–370.
  3. Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Herzeele IV, et al. Editor's Choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2019; 57(1): 8–93.
  4. Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018; 67(1): 2–77.e2.
  5. Jonker FHW, Aruny J, Muhs BE. Management of type II endoleaks: preoperative versus postoperative versus expectant management. Semin Vasc Surg. 2009; 22(3): 165–171.
  6. Pineda DM, Calligaro KD, Tyagi S, et al. Late type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair require intervention more frequently than early type II endoleaks. J Vasc Surg. 2018; 67(2): 449–452.
  7. Lo RC, Buck DB, Herrmann J, et al. Vascular Study Group of New England. Risk factors and consequences of persistent type II endoleaks. J Vasc Surg. 2016; 63(4): 895–901.
  8. Yang RY, Tan KT, Beecroft JR, et al. Direct sac puncture versus transarterial embolization of type II endoleaks: An evaluation and comparison of outcomes. Vascular. 2017; 25(3): 227–233.
  9. Ravesh SM, Langguth P, Pfarr JA, et al. Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for visualization and quantification of endovascular aortic prosthesis, their endoleaks and aneurysm sacs at 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging. 2019; 60: 164–172.
  10. Kawada H, Goshima S, Sakurai K, et al. Utility of Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Aneurysm Follow-Up and Detection of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Repair. Korean J Radiol. 2021; 22(4): 513–524.
  11. McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, et al. Gadolinium Deposition in Human Brain Tissues after Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging in Adult Patients without Intracranial Abnormalities. Radiology. 2017; 285(2): 546–554.
  12. McDonald JS, McDonald RJ, Jentoft ME, et al. Intracranial Gadolinium Deposition Following Gadodiamide-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pediatric Patients: A Case-Control Study. JAMA Pediatr. 2017; 171(7): 705–707.
  13. Davenport MS, Perazella MA, Yee J, et al. Use of Intravenous Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients with Kidney Disease: Consensus Statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation. Radiology. 2020; 294(3): 660–668.
  14. Juneman E, Saleh L, Thai H, et al. The use of gadolinium in patients with contrast allergy or renal failure requiring coronary angiography, coronary intervention, or vascular procedure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 78(5): 747–754.
  15. Arenas Azofra E, Rey VM, Marcos FÁ, et al. Results of Transarterial Embolization for Treating Type 2 Endoleaks: A Single-Center Experience. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020; 66: 104–109.
  16. Horinouchi H, Okada T, Yamaguchi M, et al. Mid-term Outcomes and Predictors of Transarterial Embolization for Type II Endoleak After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020; 43(5): 696–705.
  17. Habets J, Zandvoort HJA, Reitsma JB, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013; 45(4): 340–350.
  18. van der Laan MJ, Bartels LW, Bakker CJG, et al. Suitability of 7 aortic stent-graft models for MRI-based surveillance. J Endovasc Ther. 2004; 11(4): 366–371.